가정법원의 문제해결·후견적 기능 제고를 위한 과제 ―보호사건을 중심으로―
How to Improve the Function of State Parent and Problem-Solving by Family Court: Focused on so-called Protective Cases
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the 21st century, juvenile crimes, delinquencies, and domestic violences have much more attracted social attention, which cannot be separated from the changed social environment, where, on the one hand, the traditional ‘head of family’ system not only as a social entity, but also as a legal system has eventually been abolished in 2005, and where, on the other hand, the conflict between traditional and new value system has arisen as the ideology of democracy, equality, and respect to human rights has rapidly entered the Korean society since the end of 20th century. In other words, the traditional way of dealing with problematic behaviors of adolescents and family members against other family members has begun to face limitations. Coincidently, the problem-solving function of the family court has been emphasized. This paper is the result of research, whereby what systemic change would be required to have the family court dealing with juvenile cases, dependent children cases, and domestic violence victim cases function as the problem-solving court and what roles the family court investigators should play for this purpose have been investigated. This paper sought to make clear that the fact that juvenile cases, dependent children cases, and domestic violence victim cases are under the jurisdiction of the family court reflects the unique Korean state parent idea. In this regard, Korean family court’s cases mentioned above are similar to western juvenile courts and dependency courts, which have developed in close relation with the state parent idea. That being said, western state parent idea has developed as with the local authorities’ intervention into families for the protection of abused and delinquent children, and juvenile courts and family courts have played as assistants and facilitators for local authorities to do partnership with families as the state parent idea changed, whereas the state parent idea has developed in Korea only in the judicial proceedings for abused and delinquent children cases, where public prosecutors and judges play role as state parents. Based on this unique development, this paper argues that transforming the family court into the problem-solving court is recommended to facilitate local authorities intervening into family matters for the protection of abused and delinquent children and domestic violence victims. For this purpose, this paper suggests that the legal provisions related to the proceedings and protection measures of juvenile cases, child abuse cases, and domestic violence cases should be reformed for partnership between the state and families to materialize. Furthermore, this paper suggests that expertise of family investigators should be developed to facilitate the suggested reformation, and that the social welfare and protection function of family courts, which have been introduced in some family courts to meet immediate needs of protecting vulnerable parties and participants in the proceedings, should be delegated to an independent support agency under the court.
Abstract
In the 21st century, juvenile crimes, delinquencies, and domestic violences have much more attracted social attention, which cannot be separated from the changed social environment, where, on the one hand, the traditional ‘head of family’ system not only as a social entity, but also as a legal system has eventually been abolished in 2005, and where, on the other hand, the conflict between traditional and new value system has arisen as the ideology of democracy, equality, and respect to human rights has rapidly entered the Korean society since the end of 20th century. In other words, the traditional way of dealing with problematic behaviors of adolescents and family members against other family members has begun to face limitations. Coincidently, the problem-solving function of the family court has been emphasized. This paper is the result of research, whereby what systemic change would be required to have the family court dealing with juvenile cases, dependent children cases, and domestic violence victim cases function as the problem-solving court and what roles the family court investigators should play for this purpose have been investigated. This paper sought to make clear that the fact that juvenile cases, dependent children cases, and domestic violence victim cases are under the jurisdiction of the family court reflects the unique Korean state parent idea. In this regard, Korean family court’s cases mentioned above are similar to western juvenile courts and dependency courts, which have developed in close relation with the state parent idea. That being said, western state parent idea has developed as with the local authorities’ intervention into families for the protection of abused and delinquent children, and juvenile courts and family courts have played as assistants and facilitators for local authorities to do partnership with families as the state parent idea changed, whereas the state parent idea has developed in Korea only in the judicial proceedings for abused and delinquent children cases, where public prosecutors and judges play role as state parents. Based on this unique development, this paper argues that transforming the family court into the problem-solving court is recommended to facilitate local authorities intervening into family matters for the protection of abused and delinquent children and domestic violence victims. For this purpose, this paper suggests that the legal provisions related to the proceedings and protection measures of juvenile cases, child abuse cases, and domestic violence cases should be reformed for partnership between the state and families to materialize. Furthermore, this paper suggests that expertise of family investigators should be developed to facilitate the suggested reformation, and that the social welfare and protection function of family courts, which have been introduced in some family courts to meet immediate needs of protecting vulnerable parties and participants in the proceedings, should be delegated to an independent support agency under the court.
참고문헌 (32)
- 권재문, "‘가정’법원의 역할 확대와 가정‘법원’의 바람직한 기능 - 미국 통합가정법원(UFC)에 대한 비판론을 중심으로 -", 인권과 정의, (430), pp.6~24 (2012), 대한변호사협회[DOI]
- 김병수, "형사사법과 의료, 복지의 협력으로서 약물법원", 형사법연구, 26(4), pp.181~211 (2014), 한국형사법학회[DOI]
- 김성우, "한국 후견제도의 운영과 가정법원의 역할", 법조, 66(2), pp.123~160 (2017), 법조협회[DOI]
- 김성태, "가사조사관제도의 개선방안에 관한 소고", 법학논총, 49, pp.53~84 (2021), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 문선주, "소년 형사사법절차의 개선에 관한 연구―통합적 운용가능성을 중심으로" (2019), 사법정책연구원
- 서울가정법원, "가사소년제도개혁위원회 자료집(I)" (2005)
- 서인선, "법원선의주의와 기소독점주의의 관계 - 최근 소년사법 개정논의를 중심으로 -", 법조, 55(1), pp.178~205 (2006), 법조협회
- 성경숙, "정신장애범죄자에 대한 치료처분제도의 개선방안: 미국의 치료법원의 도입을 중심으로", 형사법연구, 22(2), pp.87~108 (2010), 한국형사법학회[DOI]
- 성경숙, "치료적 사법의 개념과 그 적용가능성", 형사정책연구, 23(4), pp.33~61 (2012), 한국형사법무정책연구원
- 성경숙, "가정폭력범죄에 대한 치료적 사법의 접근 - 가정폭력법원의 도입을 중심으로 -", 형사법연구, 29(3), pp.327~359 (2017), 한국형사법학회
- 송현종, "가사조사관의 인력과 직무에 관한 연구", 가족법연구, 26(3), pp.43~66 (2012), 한국가족법학회
- 송현종, "가정법원복지서비스에 관한 연구: 가사조사관 직무에 대한 법관과 조사관의 인식을 중심으로", 미래청소년학회지, 11(4), pp.1~22 (2014), 미래를 여는 청소년학회
- 안문희, "미국 통합가정법원에 관한 연구" (2019), 사법정책연구원
- 이호중, "아동학대에 대한 대응시스템의 문제점과 전문법원제도의 도입방안-피학대아동에 대한 보호서비스와 친권제한 등의 유기적 연계를 중심으로-", 피해자학연구, 15(2), pp.207~238 (2007), 한국피해자학회
- 장영인, "학대피해아동 보호에서의 아동권리와부모권리의 균형모색 - 영국 아동보호관련법의 전개과정을 중심으로-", 아동과 권리, 17(4), pp.541~570 (2013), 한국아동권리학회
- 장영인, "미국 캘리포니아주 아동학대에 대한 사회복지적 개입에 관한 연구", 사회복지법제연구, 10(1), pp.155~182 (2019), 사회복지법제학회
- 장영인, "아동의 ‘원가정보호’와 ‘가정내양육’에 대한 국가지원 확대 방안 -아동복지법 개정 방향을 중심으로-", 사회복지법제연구, 12(1), pp.3~36 (2021), 사회복지법제학회
- A. Dutta, "FamFG Kommentar" (2022), Gieseking
- Alan Hodkinson, "Key Issues in Special Educational Needs" (2019), Disability & Inclusion
- B. A. Babb, "Caring for Families in Court" (2019), Routledge
- Bradley Ray, "Problem-Solving Courts, the Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice" (2014), Wiley Online Library
- DeMatteo, "Problem-Solving Courts and the Criminal Justice System" (2019), Oxford University Press
- Edward E. Peoples, "Juvenile Procedures in Claifornia" (2019), Meadow Crest Publishing
- Frider Dünkel, "Oxford Handbooks Online" (2017)
- ne Donoghue, "Transforming Criminal Justice?" (2014), Routledge
- Jonathan Herring, "Family Law" (2017), Pearson
- Kim Holt, "Child Protection" (2014), Alison Brammer
- Paul Higgins, "Problem-Solving Courts", pp.ix~ (2009), ABC CLIO
- Preston Elrod, "Juvenile Justice" (2021), Jones & Bartlett Learning
- R. Canton, "Probation" (2018), Routledge
- Sara Raymond, "From Playpens to Prisons: What the Gang Violence and Juvenile Crime Prevention Act of 1998 Does to California’s Juvenile Justice System and Reasons to Repeal It", Golden Gate University Law Review, 30 (2000)
- Thomas Croft, "Criminal Responsibility of Children and Young Persons: a Comparison of English and German Law" (2002), Ashgate
