영어와 한국어의 정중성 활용 방안
Practical Usage Device on Politeness of English and Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this paper is to search and suggest the practical usage device on politeness of English and Korean. Politeness is a kind of activity for good manners and it makes our society friendly and live. If someone talks with each other through politeness, their speakings are friendly and good communication activities. When they communicate with each other through politeness, a kind of good manners, they can understand each other well and easily. We have a concept of politeness although it is conscious or unconscious thought. English and Korean have some practical usage devices about politeness. First, it is a cultural difference between Korea and America. America is a linear social structure and Korea is a hierarchical social structure. Second, we can say it at the speaker’s and hearer’s consciousness structure. So, we have to use language with a conscious or nonconscious politeness. Third, we are able to find it at the difference of educational levels. People of higher educational levels use good manners through politeness when they talk, however, people of lower educational levels talk with slangs and use bad manners through non-politeness when they talk. Fourth, we can say it at our living habits. In general, people using politeness are diligent, kind, kindhearted and friendly. But people not using politeness are lazy, non-conceptual, wasteful, unkind. Fifth, we can find and say it at the difference from family members. Large family members are kind, kindhearted and talk with good manners but, generally, nuclear family members are less kind, kindhearted, friendly, diligent than large family members. In conclusion, when we talk about the difference of politeness and practical usage device on politeness of English and Korean, Korean is more polite language than English language. Politeness is very important manner, so we have to keep on using politeness through good ways when we talk to each other.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to search and suggest the practical usage device on politeness of English and Korean. Politeness is a kind of activity for good manners and it makes our society friendly and live. If someone talks with each other through politeness, their speakings are friendly and good communication activities. When they communicate with each other through politeness, a kind of good manners, they can understand each other well and easily. We have a concept of politeness although it is conscious or unconscious thought. English and Korean have some practical usage devices about politeness. First, it is a cultural difference between Korea and America. America is a linear social structure and Korea is a hierarchical social structure. Second, we can say it at the speaker’s and hearer’s consciousness structure. So, we have to use language with a conscious or nonconscious politeness. Third, we are able to find it at the difference of educational levels. People of higher educational levels use good manners through politeness when they talk, however, people of lower educational levels talk with slangs and use bad manners through non-politeness when they talk. Fourth, we can say it at our living habits. In general, people using politeness are diligent, kind, kindhearted and friendly. But people not using politeness are lazy, non-conceptual, wasteful, unkind. Fifth, we can find and say it at the difference from family members. Large family members are kind, kindhearted and talk with good manners but, generally, nuclear family members are less kind, kindhearted, friendly, diligent than large family members. In conclusion, when we talk about the difference of politeness and practical usage device on politeness of English and Korean, Korean is more polite language than English language. Politeness is very important manner, so we have to keep on using politeness through good ways when we talk to each other.
참고문헌 (26)
- 김상혁, "화용론과 영어 공손 표현 -중학교 영어 교재를 중심으로-", 영어영문학연구, 54(3), pp.103~127 (2012), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- 김한창, "영어의 정중성 표현", 언어연구, (11), pp.23~37 (1994)
- 민현식, "국어 문법 연구" (1999), 도서출판 역락
- 배경선, "영어와 한국어의 정중성 비교 연구", 박사, pp.1999
- 양용준, "정중성의 의미와 기법", 신영어영문학, (25), pp.271~296 (2003), 신영어영문학회
- 양용준, "정중성의 의미와 쓰임에 관한 연구", 영어영문학연구, 35(3), pp.183~204 (2009), 대한영어영문학회
- 임지룡, "국어 의미론" (2011), 탑출판사
- Blum-Kulla, S, "Indirectness and politeness: Same and different?", Journal of Pragmatics, 11 (1987)
- Brown, P., "Questions and Politeness" (1978), Fellow of New Hall
- Brown, P., "Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Cruse, D. Alan, "Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics" (2004), Oxford University Press
- Cruse, D. Alan, "A Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics" (2006), Edinburgh University Press
- Fraser, B, "Perspectives on politeness", Journal of Pragmatics, (14), pp.219~236 (1990)
- Fraser, B., "The association of deference with linguistic form", International Journal of Sociology of Language, (27), pp.93~109 (1981)
- Grice, H. P, "Logic conversation" (1975), Academic Press
- Griffiths, P., "An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics" (2006), Edinburgh University Press
- Grundy, P., "Doing Pragmatics" (2008), Hodder Education
- Gumperz, J. J., "Discourse Strategies" (1982), Cambridge University Press
- Kang, H. J., "Politeness Theory and Dialogue Analysis", 박사, pp.2002
- Kasper, G., "Linguistic politeness-Current research issues", Journal of Pragmatics, (14), pp.193~218 (1990)
- Lakoff, R., "The limits of politeness: Therapeutic and courtroom discourse", Multiligua, (8), pp.101~130 (1989)
- Levinson, S. C., "Pragmatics" (1983), Cambridge University Press
- Leech, G., "The Principles of Pragmatics" (1983), Longman Linguistics Library Essex
- Searle, J., "Speech Acts" (1969), Cambridge University Press
- Searle, J., "Expression and Meaning" (1979), Cambridge University Press
- Watts, R., "Linguistic Politeness and Politic Behavior: Reconsidering Claims for Universality", Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs, (59), pp.43~69 (1992)