영국희곡 영어어휘 목록 개발
Development of an English Word List for British Drama
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is mainly intended to develop an English word list for students majoring in British drama. To achieve this goal, the following steps were taken. First, two target corpora were compiled and a reference corpus (BNC Baby) was utilized for a comparative analysis. One is Shakespeare drama corpus (SDC) including around 820,000 running words constructed from 37 plays and the other is Bernard Shaw drama corpus (BSDC) including around 930,000 running words from 31 plays. Secondly, Heatley & Nation’s (2002) Range and Scott’s (2015) WordSmith 6.0 were comparatively operated to adopt a more appropriate program for analyzing the corpora listed above. Thirdly, to extract an English word list, the programs utilized 2 most efficient criteria, frequency and range, regardless of other minor criteria, such as dispersion and familiarity. As a result, this paper extracted a total of 1,287 word families from a combined corpus of SDC and BSDC with the help of frequency (≥39 times) and range (≥30 plays). The result of analysis reveals that 1) rather than Heatley & Nation’s (2002) Range, Scott’s (2015) WordSmith 6.0 is a comparatively better program for analyzing both SDC and BSDC; 2) the created English word list helps to satisfy an essential need of students studying British drama.
Abstract
This paper is mainly intended to develop an English word list for students majoring in British drama. To achieve this goal, the following steps were taken. First, two target corpora were compiled and a reference corpus (BNC Baby) was utilized for a comparative analysis. One is Shakespeare drama corpus (SDC) including around 820,000 running words constructed from 37 plays and the other is Bernard Shaw drama corpus (BSDC) including around 930,000 running words from 31 plays. Secondly, Heatley & Nation’s (2002) Range and Scott’s (2015) WordSmith 6.0 were comparatively operated to adopt a more appropriate program for analyzing the corpora listed above. Thirdly, to extract an English word list, the programs utilized 2 most efficient criteria, frequency and range, regardless of other minor criteria, such as dispersion and familiarity. As a result, this paper extracted a total of 1,287 word families from a combined corpus of SDC and BSDC with the help of frequency (≥39 times) and range (≥30 plays). The result of analysis reveals that 1) rather than Heatley & Nation’s (2002) Range, Scott’s (2015) WordSmith 6.0 is a comparatively better program for analyzing both SDC and BSDC; 2) the created English word list helps to satisfy an essential need of students studying British drama.
참고문헌 (31)
- 권미분, "호텔영어 코퍼스 생성과 어휘적 특성", 언어과학, 23(4), pp.25~44 (2016), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
- 권선희, "컨벤션영어 코퍼스 기반 연어 분석", 영어교육연구, 26(4), pp.109~130 (2014), 팬코리아영어교육학회[DOI]
- 신동광, "기본 어휘의 선정 기준 －영어 어휘를 중심으로", 국어교육학연구, (40), pp.217~243 (2011), 국어교육학회[DOI]
- 신창원, "ESP 교육을 위한 소규모 코퍼스 구축: 기계공학 관련 논문초록을 중심으로", 언어와 정보 사회, 17, pp.175~205 (2012), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 이문복, "2015 영어과 교육과정 기본 어휘 목록 개발", 영어교과교육, 14(4), pp.115~134 (2015), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
- 이제영, "학술 전문 코퍼스를 활용한 영어교육 전문 어휘 추출", Foreign Languages Education, 20(1), pp.99~122 (2013), 한국외국어교육학회
- 장세은, "코퍼스를 활용한 해사영어 어휘 분석", 새한영어영문학, 53(4), pp.247~268 (2011), 새한영어영문학회[DOI]
- 정미애, "코퍼스 분석을 통해 살펴본 비즈니스 영어의 어휘적 특성", 언어, 32(4), pp.751~777 (2007), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 하명호, "공학영어 어휘 목록 개발", 언어과학, 24(3), pp.167~185 (2017), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
- 조혜원, "Creating a specialized word list for ESP college students", 영어영문학연구, 57(1), pp.541~564 (2015), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
- Corson, D., "The learning and use of academic English words", Language Learning, 47, pp.671~718 (1997)
- Coxhead, A., "A new academic word list", TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), pp.213~238 (2000)
- Flowerdew, J., "Concordancing as a tool in course design", System, 21(2), pp.231~244 (1993)
- Heatley, A., "RANGE and FREQUENCY programs.", ~ (2002)
- Kayaoğlu, M. N., "The use of corpus for close synonyms", The Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 9(1), pp.128~144 (2013)
- Laufer, B., "Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy", pp.20~34 (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Lewis, M., "The lexical approach" (1993), Language Teaching Publications
- Lewis, M., "Teaching collocation: Further developments in the lexical approach" (2000), Language Teaching Publications
- Martínez, I. A., "Academic vocabulary in agricultural research articles: A corpus-based study", English for Specific Purposes, 28, pp.183~198 (2009)
- Mudraya, O., "Engineering English: A lexical frequency instructional model", English for Specific Purposes, 25, pp.235~256 (2006)
- 남대현, "Lexical Bundle Structure Distribution in Argumentative Writing of Korean and American University Students", 영어영문학연구, 58(4), pp.347~370 (2016), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
- Nation, I. S. P., "Teaching and learning vocabulary" (1990), Heinle and Heinle
- Nation, I. S. P., "New ways in teaching vocabulary" (1994), TESOL
- Nation, I. S. P., "Learning vocabulary in another language" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Scott, M., "WordSmith tools manual" (2015), Lexical Analysis Software
- Valipouri, L., "A corpus-based study of academic vocabulary in chemistry research articles", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(4), pp.248~263 (2013)
- Ward, J., "A basic engineering English word list for less proficient foundation engineering undergraduates", English for Specific Purposes, 28, pp.170~182 (2009)
- West, M., "A general service list of English words" (1953), Longman
- Xue, G., "A university word list", Language Learning and Communication, 3, pp.215~229 (1984)
- Zareva, A., "Relationship between lexical competence and language proficiency: Variable sensitivity", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, pp.567~595 (2005)