본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

[+시제] 자질에 의한 격 부여에 관하여: 영어와 한국어를 중심으로

On Case-Assignment by [+Tense] Feature on TP: Evidence from English and Korean

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study investigates how tense feature affects CP’s Case-assignment. Chomsky (1980) proposed that tense is the feature which assigns Case to subject in tensed finite clauses. Chomsky (1980)’s argument, in turn, has justified the widely accepted view that untensed clauses do not assign Case. This study, however, attempts to show that, in reality, there exists a considerable amount of data that suggest that untensed clauses assign Case as well and this possibility was, initially, addressed, in depth, in Park (2020). This study argues that tense is not the sole factor which contributes to assignment of Case to subject and that Case-assignment to subject can be triggered by other factors such as marking of a sentence as a proposition in English. This study also reveals that Park (2020)’s attempt to analyze the derivation of relative clauses under the perspective of movement nicely converges with Case-assignment theory. In the meantime, this approach also provides a principled account of the phenomenon that anaphor-binding relation holds between a head noun(antecedent) and anaphor in relative clauses. Lastly, this study also reveals that subject case marker-dropping in untensed non-finite clauses in Korean is triggered by the syntactic environment in which the subject does not have agentive theta-role.

Abstract

This study investigates how tense feature affects CP’s Case-assignment. Chomsky (1980) proposed that tense is the feature which assigns Case to subject in tensed finite clauses. Chomsky (1980)’s argument, in turn, has justified the widely accepted view that untensed clauses do not assign Case. This study, however, attempts to show that, in reality, there exists a considerable amount of data that suggest that untensed clauses assign Case as well and this possibility was, initially, addressed, in depth, in Park (2020). This study argues that tense is not the sole factor which contributes to assignment of Case to subject and that Case-assignment to subject can be triggered by other factors such as marking of a sentence as a proposition in English. This study also reveals that Park (2020)’s attempt to analyze the derivation of relative clauses under the perspective of movement nicely converges with Case-assignment theory. In the meantime, this approach also provides a principled account of the phenomenon that anaphor-binding relation holds between a head noun(antecedent) and anaphor in relative clauses. Lastly, this study also reveals that subject case marker-dropping in untensed non-finite clauses in Korean is triggered by the syntactic environment in which the subject does not have agentive theta-role.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. Caterina, Donati, "Relabeling heads: A unified account for relativization structures", Linguistic Inquiry, 42(4), pp.1~34 (2011)
  2. Chomsky, Noam, "On binding", Linguistic Inquiry, 11, pp.1~46 (1980)
  3. Chomsky, Noam, "Lectures on government and binding" (1981), Foris Publications
  4. Chomsky, Noam, "Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use" (1986), Praeger
  5. Chomsky, Noam, "The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger", pp.1~52 (1993), MIT Press
  6. Chomsky, Noam, "Bare phrase structure. Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory" (1995), Georgetown University Press
  7. Chomsky, Noam, "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
  8. Keenan, Edward, "Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar", Linguistic Inquiry, 8, pp.63~99 (1977)
  9. Lee, Kum-Young, "Finite control in Korean", pp.2009
  10. 박준석, "A Study of the Derivation of Relative Clauses: Focusing on Case-Assignment and Co-indexing", 영어영문학연구, 62(2), pp.133~151 (2020), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
  11. William Croft, "Typology and universals" (2003), Cambridge University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)