Exceptionality in Optimality Theory: Implication from umlaut in English and German plural formation
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There are plenty of phonological processes in natural language that only occur in the context of particular morphemes or lexical categories. The question is how such morpheme (or lexicon) specific processes, sometimes called exceptionality, can be captured in the framework of Optimality Theory (Prince and Smolensky 1993, McCarthy and Prince 1995). Two different types of treatment have mostly been proposed: (i) structural prespecification like floating features, mora, underspecification, etc (Zoll 1996, 2001, Inkelas, Orgun and Zoll 1997, Inkelas 2000, Wolf 2007, Kager to appear, and many others), and (ii) diacritic approach, mostly employing morpheme-specific constraints (Hammond 1995, Golston and Wiese 1995, Golston 1996, Russel 1995, Yip 1998, Pater 2000, 2004, 2007, Ota 2004, Green 2005, Flack to appear, and many others). The purpose of this study is to compare the two different views and to show that the latter is superior to the former in accounting for exceptional plural formation implemented by umlaut in English and German.
Abstract
There are plenty of phonological processes in natural language that only occur in the context of particular morphemes or lexical categories. The question is how such morpheme (or lexicon) specific processes, sometimes called exceptionality, can be captured in the framework of Optimality Theory (Prince and Smolensky 1993, McCarthy and Prince 1995). Two different types of treatment have mostly been proposed: (i) structural prespecification like floating features, mora, underspecification, etc (Zoll 1996, 2001, Inkelas, Orgun and Zoll 1997, Inkelas 2000, Wolf 2007, Kager to appear, and many others), and (ii) diacritic approach, mostly employing morpheme-specific constraints (Hammond 1995, Golston and Wiese 1995, Golston 1996, Russel 1995, Yip 1998, Pater 2000, 2004, 2007, Ota 2004, Green 2005, Flack to appear, and many others). The purpose of this study is to compare the two different views and to show that the latter is superior to the former in accounting for exceptional plural formation implemented by umlaut in English and German.
참고문헌 (31)
- Alderete,John, "Morphologically governed accent in Optimality Theory", 박사, pp.1999
- Anttila,Arto, "Morphologically conditioned phonological alternation", pp.1~42 (2002), Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
- F?y, Caroline, "Umlaut and Inflection in German. To appear in Rene Kager" (1998), The Prosody Morphology Interface
- Flack, Kathryn, "Templatic morphology and indexed markedness constraints", Linguistic Inquiry
- Fukazawa,Haruka, "Theoretical Implications of OCP Effects on Features in Optimality Theory", 박사, pp.1999
- Golston, Chris, "Zero morphology and constraint interaction", pp.143~159 (1995), Yearbook of Morphology
- Golston, Chris, "Direct OT: Representation as pure markedness", pp.713~48 (1996), Language
- Green, Anthony Dubach, "Phonology Limited. Ms, Centre for General Linguistics, Typology and Universals Research" (2005), Berlin
- Hammond, Michael, "There is no lexicon! Ms" (1995), University of Arizona
- Inkelas, Sharon, Orhan Orgun, "The implications of lexical exceptions for the nature of grammar. In : Derivations and Constraints in Phonology", pp.393~418 (1997), Clarendon Press
- Inkelas, Sharon, "Phonotactic blocking through structural immunity. In : Studiagrammatica 45" (2000), Akademie Verlag
- It? Junko, "The phonological Lexicon. In : Handbook of Japanese Linguistics", pp.62~100 (1999), Blackwell Publishers
- It? Junko and Armin Mester, "Covert generalizations in Optimality Theory: the role of stratal faithfulness constraints. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 7.2" (2001), The Phonology-Morphology Circle of Korea
- Kager, Rene, "Lexical irregularity and the typology of contrast. In : The Nature of the Word: Essays in Honor of Paul Kiparsky", MIT Press
- Kurisu,Kazutaka, "The Phonology of Morpheme Realization", 박사, pp.2001
- McCarthy, John, "Generalized Alignment", pp.79~153 (1993), Yearbook of Morphology
- McCarthy, John, "Faithfulness and Reduplicative Identity" (1995), Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst and Rutgers University.
- Neef, Martin, "A declarative path through the jungle of German noun inflexion" (1998), Universit? D?seldorf
- Ota, Mits, "The learnability of the stratified phonological lexicon", Journal of Japanese Linguistics, 20(4) (2004)
- Pater, Joe, "Nonuniformity in English stress: the role of ranked and lexically specific constraints", pp.237~274 (2000), Phonology
- Pater, Joe, "Exceptions in Optimality Theory: Typology and Learnability. Handout from the Conference on Redefining Elicitation: Novel Data in Phonological Theory" (2004), New York University
- Pater, Joe, "The Locus of Exceptionality: Morpheme-Specific Phonology as Constraint Indexation", pp.259~296 (2007), Papers in Optimality Theory III
- Prince, Alan, "Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar" (1993), Ms., Rutgers University, New Brunswick, and University of Colorado, Boulder
- Russell, Kevin, "Morphemes and candidates in Optimality Theor" (1995), Ms, University of Manitoba
- Wiese, Richard, "The Phonology of German" (1996), Clarendon
- Wolf, Matthew, "For an autosegmental theory of mutation", pp.315~404 (2007), Papers in Optimality Theory III
- Yip, Moira, "Identity avoidance in Phonology and Morphology. In : Morphology in Relation to Phonology and Syntax", pp.216~246 (1998), CSLI Publications
- Zoll,Cheryl, "Parsing below the segment in a constraint based framework", 박사, pp.1996
- Zoll, Cheryl, "Constraints and Representation in Subsegmental Phonology. In : Segmental Phonology in Optimality Theory: Constraints and Representations", pp.46~78 (2001), Cambridge University Press
- 유시택, "독일어 명사 복수형태를 지배하는 제약들", 외국어로서의 독일어, 14(14), pp.293~316 (2004), 한국독일어교육학회
- 유시택, "변모음이 독일어 형태론에서 가지는 문법적 기능", 독일언어문학, 29(29), pp.29~52 (2005), 독일언어문학연구회