원어민 코퍼스와의 비교를 통한 한국 대학생의 여격동사 구문 활용 특성 분석
Corpus-based Analysis of Ditransitive Construction by Korean University Students
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to study the use of the alternating verbs of ditransitive construction by English native speakers and Korean learners of English. The distinctive patterns used by Korean learners are compared to native English corpus and tested by quantitative statistical analysis. In the process of learning constructions like ditransitive, Korean learners show the particular patterns that are influenced by their proficiency and their native language L1. Korean students favor dative with preposition in alternative patterns. These distinctive patterns are resulted from students’ lack of confidence on frequency level and the characteristics of L1. This study also examines how the learners handle the expressions that are not used in native corpus. It is also suggested that learners arrive enough empirical exposure to native expressions necessary for the constructional preemption.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to study the use of the alternating verbs of ditransitive construction by English native speakers and Korean learners of English. The distinctive patterns used by Korean learners are compared to native English corpus and tested by quantitative statistical analysis. In the process of learning constructions like ditransitive, Korean learners show the particular patterns that are influenced by their proficiency and their native language L1. Korean students favor dative with preposition in alternative patterns. These distinctive patterns are resulted from students’ lack of confidence on frequency level and the characteristics of L1. This study also examines how the learners handle the expressions that are not used in native corpus. It is also suggested that learners arrive enough empirical exposure to native expressions necessary for the constructional preemption.
참고문헌 (15)
- Arnold, Jenifer E, "Heaviness vs Newness: the effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering", Language, 76, pp.28~55 (2000)
- Bresnan, Joan, "Roots: Linguistics in Search of Its Evidential Base. Series: Studies in Generative Grammar", pp.77~96 (2007), Mouton de Gruyter
- Campbell, "The acquisition of English dative constructions", Applied Linguistics, 22, pp.253~267 (2001)
- Goldberg, Adel E, "Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure" (1995), Chicago University Press
- Goldberg, Adel E, "Corpus evidence of the viability of statistical preemption", Cognitive Linguistics, 22(1), pp.131~154 (2011)
- Gries, Stefan Th, "Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on “alternations”", International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), pp.97~129 (2004)
- Gries, Stefan Th, "Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting and corpora", Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, pp.182~200 (2005)
- Jeremy K Boyed, "Learning what not to say: The role of statistical preemption and categorization in a-adjective production", Language, 87, pp.55~83 (2011)
- Levin, "Beth English Verb Classes and Alternations" (1993), The University of Chicago Press
- Meyer, Charles F, "English Corpus Linguistics: an Introduction" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Newman, John, "Give: A cognitive linguistic study" (1996), Mouton de Gruyter
- Quirk, R, "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
- Stefanowitsch, Anatol, "Negative entrenchment: A usage-based approach to negative evidence", Cognitive Linguistics, 19(3), pp.513~531 (2008)
- Tomasello, Michael, "First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development" (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Wasow, Thomas, "Postverbal Behavior" (2002), Center for Study of Language and Information