아리스토텔레스의 대립 사각도와 현대 의미론에서 명제 대립에 대하여
On Propositional Oppositions in Aristotle’s Square of Opposition and in Modern Semantics
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The terms such as contradiction, contrary, subcontrary, subaltern, entailment, and so on, are commonly referred as a kind of the labels on opposition by inference in Aristotle’s square of opposition and in modern semantics. But their definitions or applications into referring to the propositional oppositions are often conflicted each other between in Aristotle’s square of opposition and in modern semantics. This paper aims to review what is the definitions of the terms on the oppositions and how to apply the terms to the oppositions in modern semantics and in Aristotle’s immediate inferences. And we try to reveal the reasons that the same terms are used differently in Aristotle’s square of opposition and in modern semantics. As a result, we have found the fact that such terms are differently applied between to Aristotle’s square of opposition and to the modern semantics, because the terms on them have been differently defined with reference to the immediate inference, to the truth conditions, or to the proposition itself.
Abstract
The terms such as contradiction, contrary, subcontrary, subaltern, entailment, and so on, are commonly referred as a kind of the labels on opposition by inference in Aristotle’s square of opposition and in modern semantics. But their definitions or applications into referring to the propositional oppositions are often conflicted each other between in Aristotle’s square of opposition and in modern semantics. This paper aims to review what is the definitions of the terms on the oppositions and how to apply the terms to the oppositions in modern semantics and in Aristotle’s immediate inferences. And we try to reveal the reasons that the same terms are used differently in Aristotle’s square of opposition and in modern semantics. As a result, we have found the fact that such terms are differently applied between to Aristotle’s square of opposition and to the modern semantics, because the terms on them have been differently defined with reference to the immediate inference, to the truth conditions, or to the proposition itself.
참고문헌 (14)
- 이성범, "언어와 이해—현대의미론의 이해—" (1999), 태학사
- Boole, George, "An investigation of the laws of thought on which are founded the mathematical theories of logic and probabilities" (1854), Dover Publications
- Carnap, Rudolf, "Meaning and necessity" (1947), The University of Chicago Press
- Frege, Gottlob, "Begriffsschrift und andere Afsat" (1977), Goerg Olms
- Fromkin Victoria, "An introduction to language" (2014), Wadworth Cengage Learning
- Hurley, Patrick J., "A concise introduction to logic" (2011), Wadworth Cengage Learning
- 강남길, "The Acquisition of Overlapping Reference by College Students", 영어영문학연구, 57(2), pp.1~22 (2015), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
- Kreidler, Charles W., "Introducing English semantics" (2014), Routledge
- Kripke, Saul, "Semantics of natural language", pp.763~769 (1972), Reidel
- Montague, Richard, "Approaches to Natural Language", pp.221~242 (1973), Reidel
- Newen, Albert, "Semantics, 191-215. Germany : De Gruyter" (2011), De Gruyter
- Quine, Willard van Orman, "From a logical point of view" (1953), Harvard University Press
- Russell, Bertland, "The principles of mathematics" (1903), Cambridge University Press
- 윤흥섭, "영어와 논리어의 영향권 중의성에 대하여", 영어영문학연구, 59(4), pp.361~380 (2017), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]