본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Deriving Coordinate (A)symmetries out of the Survive Principle

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The coexistence of the symmetries and asymmetries of coordinate structures has long been a challenge in the tradition of generative grammar. In most coordinate constructions, it is argued, symmetric coordination is maintained through feature mapping algorithms across all syntactic levels, which are first proposed in Velde (2005). In particular, the apparent asymmetric phenomenon like CSC is in fact the result of both symmetric feature mapping at lexical selection and Remerge in narrow syntax. In the approach to coordinate structures proposed here, which is based on the assumptions and principles of the Survive-minimalism (cf. Putnam and Stroik (2008) and Stroik and Putnam (2013)), the second conjunct, to which a coordinating conjunction has already adjoined due to its defectiveness instead of projecting its phrase, is right-adjoined to the last member of the first conjunct. The resulting structure implies that any elements in the first conjunct c-command those in the second conjunct, accounting for coordinate asymmetries structurally. Moreover, in a derivational way, we can account for the surprising Principle A symmetry in coordinate constructions, following Lebeaux’s (2009) suggestion about the domain of binding principles and Velde’s (2009) list-adjunction.

Abstract

The coexistence of the symmetries and asymmetries of coordinate structures has long been a challenge in the tradition of generative grammar. In most coordinate constructions, it is argued, symmetric coordination is maintained through feature mapping algorithms across all syntactic levels, which are first proposed in Velde (2005). In particular, the apparent asymmetric phenomenon like CSC is in fact the result of both symmetric feature mapping at lexical selection and Remerge in narrow syntax. In the approach to coordinate structures proposed here, which is based on the assumptions and principles of the Survive-minimalism (cf. Putnam and Stroik (2008) and Stroik and Putnam (2013)), the second conjunct, to which a coordinating conjunction has already adjoined due to its defectiveness instead of projecting its phrase, is right-adjoined to the last member of the first conjunct. The resulting structure implies that any elements in the first conjunct c-command those in the second conjunct, accounting for coordinate asymmetries structurally. Moreover, in a derivational way, we can account for the surprising Principle A symmetry in coordinate constructions, following Lebeaux’s (2009) suggestion about the domain of binding principles and Velde’s (2009) list-adjunction.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Borsley, Robert, "Against ConjP", Lingua, 4, pp.461~482 (2005)
  2. Chomsky, Noam, "Aspects of the theory of syntax" (1965), MIT Press
  3. Chomsky, Noam, "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
  4. Chomsky, Noam, "Step by step", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
  5. Chomsky, Noam, "Three factors in language design", Linguistic Inquiry, 36(1), pp.1~22 (2005)
  6. Citko, Barbara, "On the nature of merge: External merge, internal merge, and parallel merge", Linguistic Inquiry, 36(4), pp.475~496 (2005)
  7. Frampton, John, "Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program", pp.90~105 (2002), Blackwell Publishing
  8. Gazdar, Gerald, "Unbounded dependencies and coordinate structure", Linguistic Inquiry, 12(2), pp.155~184 (1981)
  9. Johannessen, Janne Bondi, "Coordination" (1998), Oxford University Press
  10. 김성해, "Control Structure under Survive-minimalism", 영어영문학연구, 60(3), pp.147~163 (2018), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
  11. Lebeaux, David, "Where does binding theory apply?" (2009), MIT Press
  12. Munn, Allan, "The syntax of subordinate and coordinate adjunct clauses", pp.1993
  13. Putnam, Michael, "Syntactic relations in Survive-minimalism", Ms, pp.2008
  14. Putnam, Michael, "Towards a derivational syntax: Survive- minimalism", pp.3~19 (2009), John Benjamins
  15. Ross, John Robert, "Constraints on variables in syntax", MA, pp.1967
  16. Sag, Ivan, "Coordination and how to distinguish categories", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 3, pp.117~171 (1985)
  17. Schwabe, Kerstin, "Ellipsis in conjunction" (2000), Max Niemeyer
  18. Stroik, Thomas, "The Survive principle", Linguistic Analysis, 29, pp.239~258 (1999)
  19. Stroik, Thomas, "Locality in minimalist syntax" (2007), The MIT Press
  20. Stroik, Thomas, "The structural design of language" (2013), Cambridge University Press
  21. Travis, Lisa, "Adverbs and adjunction", pp.177~200 (1988), Institut fur Linguistik, Universitat Postdam
  22. Velde, John te, "Deriving coordinate symmetries: a phase-based approach integrating select, merge, copy and match" (2005), John Benjamins Publishing
  23. Velde, John te, "Towards a derivational syntax: Survive-minimalism", pp.169~192 (2009), John Benjamins
  24. Williams, Edwin, "Across the board rule application", Linguistic Inquiry, 9(1), pp.31~43 (1978)
  25. Williams, Edwin, "Semantic and syntactic categories", Linguistics and Philosophy, 6(3), pp.423~446 (1983)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)