영어와 한국어에서 자질 삼투를 통한 일치 다시 보기
Agreement through Feature Percolation in English and Korean Revisited
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper investigates the syntactic structure for the agreement attraction of the subject in English and the honorific subject or goal in Korean in terms of the subject or goal and verb(al predicate) agreement. The subject-honorific verbal ending si or goal-honorific verb tulita in Korean belongs to the verbal predicate. The subject-verb agreement in English is mistakenly affected by the feature percolation in the syntactic structure between an agreement target and a local attractor. The [+/-PL] feature in English and [+/-HON] feature in Korean, which undergo upward or downward percolation other than [WH], are also suggested to be a local attractor for the subject or goal and the verb(al predicate) agreement. In the coordinate structure of English subjects and Korean subjects or goals, the [+/-PL] feature or the [+/-HON] feature of the NP closer to the agreement target is a strong one, which undergoes upward percolation to the entire subject or goal DP. This is contrary to Jang and Kim’s (2021) suggestion that the plural feature percolates into the DP because it is a strong one. Last but not least, this is why coordinate elements in Korean subject or goal positions do not necessarily follow the animacy hierarchy.
Abstract
This paper investigates the syntactic structure for the agreement attraction of the subject in English and the honorific subject or goal in Korean in terms of the subject or goal and verb(al predicate) agreement. The subject-honorific verbal ending si or goal-honorific verb tulita in Korean belongs to the verbal predicate. The subject-verb agreement in English is mistakenly affected by the feature percolation in the syntactic structure between an agreement target and a local attractor. The [+/-PL] feature in English and [+/-HON] feature in Korean, which undergo upward or downward percolation other than [WH], are also suggested to be a local attractor for the subject or goal and the verb(al predicate) agreement. In the coordinate structure of English subjects and Korean subjects or goals, the [+/-PL] feature or the [+/-HON] feature of the NP closer to the agreement target is a strong one, which undergoes upward percolation to the entire subject or goal DP. This is contrary to Jang and Kim’s (2021) suggestion that the plural feature percolates into the DP because it is a strong one. Last but not least, this is why coordinate elements in Korean subject or goal positions do not necessarily follow the animacy hierarchy.
참고문헌 (35)
- 김동석, "허사 there의 병합과 이동", 영미어문학, (101), pp.139~156 (2011), 한국영미어문학회
- 김동석, "자연 언어의 비정규적 주어에 대한 통합적 연구 (I) -한국어와 일본어의 비정규적 주어를 중심으로-", 현대문법연구, (45), pp.33~76 (2006), 현대문법학회
- 김성주, "접속의 구조와 절차", 동국어문학 7, pp.283~297 (1995)
- 김연승, "허사 there의 병합위치", 언어연구, 29(3), pp.399~418 (2013), 한국현대언어학회[DOI]
- 김영희, "대칭 관계와 접속조사 ‘와’", 한글, 154, pp.41~63 (1974)
- 김종록, "국어 접속의 다단계성과 접속소의 기능(1)", 국어교육연구, 31, pp.127~151 (1999)
- 박호관, "국어 접속 명사구의 통사 구조와 의미", 우리말글, 24, pp.23~40 (2002), 우리말글학회
- 이두원, "복수자질과 존칭자질 삼투에 의한 주어-동사(술부) 일치", 언어학 연구, (63), pp.105~130 (2022), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
- 장기성, "독어에서 유표성과 병렬적 명사구의 어순제약", 언어과학연구, (61), pp.233~258 (2012), 언어과학회[DOI]
- 장소영, "주어-동사 일치의 통사적 오류분석", 석사, pp.2022
- 장소영, "주어-동사 일치의 통사적 유인", 문화기술의 융합, 7(3), pp.353~358 (2021), 국제문화기술진흥원
- 주향아, "‘와", 과’ 등위 접속 명사구의 형성과 어순에 관한 연구 -유정성을 중심으로-, 2013, pp.42, 223~245[DOI]
- Bock, Kathryn, "Broken agreement", Cognitive Psychology, 23, pp.45~93 (1991)
- 조재형, "On the Plural Feature and Its Syntactic Implications", 언어학, 25(4), pp.1~22 (2017), 대한언어학회[DOI]
- Chomsky, Noam, "Barriers" (1986), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Step by step", pp.89~156 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chung, Won-Il, "A natural language model as a language learner : Focusing on subject-verb agreement", Language and Information Society, 44, pp.165~191 (2021)
- Cole, Peter, "Feature percolation", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 2, pp.91~118 (1993)
- Cooper, William. E., "Word order. Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism", Chicago Linguistic Society, 63~111 (1975)
- Corbett, Greville G, "Number" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Croft, William, "Typology and universals" (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Deal, A. Rose, "The origin and content of expletives : Evidence from"selection"", Syntax, 12, pp.286~323 (2009)
- Eberhard, Kathleen, "Making syntax of sense : Number agreement in sentence production", Psychological Review, 112, pp.531~559 (2005)
- 홍성심, "English Partitive Constructions: A Feature-based Approach", 영어학연구, 24(2), pp.87~109 (2018), 한국영어학학회[DOI]
- 김정석, "A Note on Subject Honorification in Korean", 생성문법연구, 32(1), pp.153~167 (2022), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Kim, Yeon-Seung., "Why does a case feature move in there constructions", Studies in Generative Grammar, 18, pp.311~324 (2008)
- 이두원, "Syntactic Patterns of Dative or Locative Experiencers and Goals", 영어영문학연구, 61(3), pp.291~314 (2019), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
- 이두원, "유사수문구문의 부정섬효과", 영어영문학연구, 63(4), pp.325~352 (2021), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- Park, Boon-Joo, "Subject-verb agreement processing : Eye-tracking approach", Proceedings of 2022 SMOG Winter Conference, pp.17~25 (2022)
- Quirk, Randolph, "A comprehensive grammar of the English language" (1985), Longman
- Radford, Alec, "Language models are unsurprised multitask learners", OpenAI blog, 1(8), pp.9~ (2019)
- Sobin, Nicholas, "Expletive constructions are not"lower right corner"movement constructions", Linguistic Inquiry, 35, pp.503~508 (2004)
- Solomon, Eric S., "Semantic intergration and and syntactic planning in language production", Cognitive Psychology, 49, pp.1~46 (2004)
- Vigliocco, Gabriella, "Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production: Is proximity concord syntactic or linear?", Cognition, 68, pp.B13~B29 (1998)