영어의 주어동사 불일치 현상에 대한 통합적 분석
An Integrated Analysis of Subject-Verb Agreement Mismatch in English
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is an integrated approach to the subject-verb agreement mismatch in English. This paper argues that the mismatch in subject-verb agreement is best explained under the assumption that the confusion in the part of the processor is the main cause of the mismatch. This confusion analysis is recast in the form of multiple activation under the Minimalist framework. It is also argued that the multiple activation analysis is preferred to the analyses that rely either on linear proximity between the candidate NP and the verb or on feature percolation mechanism. In addition, it is also demonstrated that the multiple activation analysis is supported by the L2 acquisition experiments in terms of reading time difference.
Abstract
This paper is an integrated approach to the subject-verb agreement mismatch in English. This paper argues that the mismatch in subject-verb agreement is best explained under the assumption that the confusion in the part of the processor is the main cause of the mismatch. This confusion analysis is recast in the form of multiple activation under the Minimalist framework. It is also argued that the multiple activation analysis is preferred to the analyses that rely either on linear proximity between the candidate NP and the verb or on feature percolation mechanism. In addition, it is also demonstrated that the multiple activation analysis is supported by the L2 acquisition experiments in terms of reading time difference.
참고문헌 (32)
- Abels,Klaus, "Phase, cyclicity, and stranding", Handout given at the EPP Workshop (2003), MIT
- Benmamoun, Elabbas, "Closest conjunct agreement in head final languages", 석사, pp.2009
- Bock, J. K, "Broken agreement", Cognitive Psychology, 23, pp.45~93 (1991)
- Bock, J. K, "Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production", Journal of Memory and Language, 31, pp.99~127 (1992)
- Boeckx,Cedric, "Quirky agreement", Studia Linguistica, 54, pp.451~480 (2000)
- Bošković,Željko, "Unifying first and last conjunct agreement", NLLT, 27, pp.3~ (2009)
- Cable,Seth, "The grammar of Q: Q-particles and the nature of wh-fronting, as revealed by the wh-questions of Tlingit", 박사, pp.2007
- EFL Teacher's Course (2nd), "The Grammar Book: An ESL", pp.1999, Cele-Murcia, Marianne
- Chen, Lang, "ERP signatures of subject-verb agreement in L2 learning", Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(2), pp.161~174 (2007)
- Chomsky,Noam, "Minimalist inquries: The framework. In Stpe by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~115 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky,Noam, "Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language In Michael Kenstowicz", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Coon,Jessica, "Interrogative possessors and the problem with pied-piping in Chol", Linguistic Inquiry, 40(1), pp.165~175 (2009)
- den Dikken,M, "'Pluringulars', pronouns and quirky agreement", The Linguistic Review, 18, pp.19~41 (2001)
- Franck, J., "Attraction in sentence production: The role of syntactic structure", Language and Cognitive Processes, 17(4), pp.371~404 (2002)
- Grohmann,Kleanthes K, "Prolific Domains: On the Anti-Locality of Movement Dependencies" (2003), JohnBenjamins
- Heck,Fabian, "On certain properties of pied-piping", Linguistic Inquiry, 40(1), pp.75~111 (2009)
- Higginbotham,James, "On semantics", Linguistic Inquiry, 16, pp.547~931 (1985)
- Hiraiwa,Ken, "Multiple agree and the defective intervention constraint in Japanese", pp.67~80 (2001), MIT
- Horvath,Julia, "In The Blackwell companion to syntax", pp.569~630 (2006), Blackwell
- Kayne,Richard, "The antisymmetry in syntax" (1994), MIT Press
- Kim,Jong-Bok, "Hybrid agreement in English", Linguistics, 42(6), pp.1105~1128 (2004)
- mball, J, "I think, you think, he think", Linguistic Inquiry, 2, pp.241~246 (1971)
- Koopman, H, "The position of subjects", Lingua, 85, pp.211~258 (1991)
- Nomura,Masashi, "Nominative Case and AGREE(ment)" (2006), MIT
- Osterhout L, "Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree", Journal of Memory and Language, 34, pp.739~773
- Schütze,Carlson, "INFL in child and adult language: Case, agreement and licensing", 박사, pp.1997
- Solomon, Eric S, "Semantic intergration and syntactic planning in language production", Cognitive Psychology, 49, pp.1~46 (2004)
- Staub,A, "On the interpretation of the number attraction effect: Response time evidence", Journal of Memory and Language, 60, pp.308~327 (2009)
- Vigliocco, G., "Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production: Is proximity concord syntactic or linear", Cognition, 68(1), pp.3~29 (1998)
- Wagers, Matthew W., "Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes", Journal of Memory and Language, 61, pp.206~237 (2009)
- Webelhuth,G, "Syntactic saturation phenomena in the Modern Germanic languages", 박사, pp.1989
- Yoon,Jeong-Me, "Successive cyclic movement, feature percolation and a typological approach to cross-linguistic variation in pied-piping", Studies in Generative Grammar, 11, pp.167~215 (2001)