본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

경국대전의 성격에 대한 일고찰

The study of the position of Kyongguk-Taejon(經國大典) in Choson Dynasty

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

There were Kyongguk-Taejon(經國大典), Ming Code(明律) and Kukcho- Oryeoi(國朝五禮儀) as the fundamental Laws of Choson Dynasty. Kyongguk- Taejon contains the systems and functions of the governments in Choson. And Taejon consists of six sections as the systems of the government. One of six sections was Hyeong-jon(刑典) and the other was Ye-jon(禮典). Hyeong-jon contained Criminal law. And Yejon included the process of national ceremony and the ceremony of the Royal family. So the contents of two parts were voluminous and it was necessary to compile extra codes. Therefore Daemyongnyul-Jikhae(大明律直解) and Kukcho-Oryeoi were edited. In Confucian dynasty, the basic norm was Ye(禮). Ye formed the keynote of all codes of Confucian. So the fundamental Laws of Choson Dynasty were kinds of Ye. Those two codes had the full force and effect of law by Kyongguk-Taejon. I think that the positions of Kyongguk-Taejon was the highest grade among the three.

Abstract

There were Kyongguk-Taejon(經國大典), Ming Code(明律) and Kukcho- Oryeoi(國朝五禮儀) as the fundamental Laws of Choson Dynasty. Kyongguk- Taejon contains the systems and functions of the governments in Choson. And Taejon consists of six sections as the systems of the government. One of six sections was Hyeong-jon(刑典) and the other was Ye-jon(禮典). Hyeong-jon contained Criminal law. And Yejon included the process of national ceremony and the ceremony of the Royal family. So the contents of two parts were voluminous and it was necessary to compile extra codes. Therefore Daemyongnyul-Jikhae(大明律直解) and Kukcho-Oryeoi were edited. In Confucian dynasty, the basic norm was Ye(禮). Ye formed the keynote of all codes of Confucian. So the fundamental Laws of Choson Dynasty were kinds of Ye. Those two codes had the full force and effect of law by Kyongguk-Taejon. I think that the positions of Kyongguk-Taejon was the highest grade among the three.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. "당률소의 해제. in: 주역 당률소의" (1994), 한국법제연구원
  2. "경국대전", ~
  3. 김충열, "중국철학사 1" (1996), 예문서원
  4. "논어", ~
  5. 법제처, "대전속록", 법제자료, 69 (1975)
  6. 송재용, "儀禮와 政治-冠·婚·喪·祭禮를 중심으로-", 비교민속학, (26), pp.375~410 (2004), 비교민속학회
  7. 오강원, "의례. in: 의례해제" (2000), 청계
  8. 윤극일, "경제육전과 경국대전" (1998), 신서원
  9. 이범직, "국조오례의의 성립에 대한 일고찰", 역사학보, 122 (1989), 역사학회
  10. 정도전, "조선경국전"
  11. 정재훈, "조선의 국왕과 의례" (2010), 지식산업사
  12. 조규창, "로마형법" (1998), 고려대학교출판부
  13. "주례", ~
  14. 지두환, "국조오례의 편찬과정(1)", 부산사학, 9 (1985), 부산경남사학회
  15. 진희권, "유가의 예와 법", 법철학연구, 3(2) (2000), 법철학회
  16. 진희권, "조선조 초기의 유교적 국가이념과 국가질서" (2008), 한국학술정보
  17. 최희수, "조선초기의 권력구조와 권력상호간의 통제원리에 대한 고찰. in: 조선시대의 규범이론과 규범체계 1" (2006), 한국학술정보
  18. 하세가와 마사야스, "일본의 헌법" (2000), 소화
  19. 함재학, "경국대전이 조선의 헌법인가?", 법철학연구, 7(2), pp.263~288 (2004), 한국법철학회
  20. 현승종, "로마법" (2004), 법문사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)