The Structural Relationship between the Possibility of Socioeconomic Class Elevation of Workers and Related Variables
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze the structural relationship between the possibility of socioeconomic class elevation of wage earners, happiness and organizational commitment, and life satisfaction. Research design, data and methodology: Data from the 24th fiscal year (2021) of the Korea Labor Panel data were used for analysis. Only wage earners who measured job satisfaction and organizational engagement were analyzed, and a sample of 9,138 respondents was finally used, excluding missing values. Structural Equation Modeling was performed using AMOS 23.0, and Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) was used as a model estimation method. Results: First, the hypothetical structural model set up for the study was found to be suitable. Second, the Possibility of Socioeconomic Class Elevation of wage earners, happiness, and organizational commitment were found to have a direct impact on life satisfaction. Third, the possibility of improving the socio-economic status of wage earners affects life satisfaction, and happiness and organizational commitment appear to have a partially mediating effect. Conclusions: This study is significant in that it has increased interest in organizational participation and life satisfaction, which were not covered in previous studies on the possibility of wage workers moving up the socioeconomic class.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze the structural relationship between the possibility of socioeconomic class elevation of wage earners, happiness and organizational commitment, and life satisfaction. Research design, data and methodology: Data from the 24th fiscal year (2021) of the Korea Labor Panel data were used for analysis. Only wage earners who measured job satisfaction and organizational engagement were analyzed, and a sample of 9,138 respondents was finally used, excluding missing values. Structural Equation Modeling was performed using AMOS 23.0, and Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) was used as a model estimation method. Results: First, the hypothetical structural model set up for the study was found to be suitable. Second, the Possibility of Socioeconomic Class Elevation of wage earners, happiness, and organizational commitment were found to have a direct impact on life satisfaction. Third, the possibility of improving the socio-economic status of wage earners affects life satisfaction, and happiness and organizational commitment appear to have a partially mediating effect. Conclusions: This study is significant in that it has increased interest in organizational participation and life satisfaction, which were not covered in previous studies on the possibility of wage workers moving up the socioeconomic class.
참고문헌 (25)
- Achor, S., "Positive intelligence", Harvard Business Review, 90(1), pp.100~102 (2012)
- Preferences for redistribution, "Alesina, A.", National Bureau of Economic Research, ~, pp.NBER Working Paper No. 14825 (2009)
- Benabou, R., "Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: the Poum hypothesis", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2) (2001), Oxford University Press
- Crompton, R., "Class and stratification : an introduction to current debates" (1998), Polity Press
- Erdogan, B., "Whistle While You Work : A Review of The Life Satisfaction Literature", Journal of management, 38(4), pp.1038~1083 (2012)
- 금현섭, "사회보험과 주관적 계층의식의 변동", 정책분석평가학회보, 21(3), pp.61~86 (2011), 한국정책분석평가학회[DOI]
- Graham, C., "Inequality and Happiness : Insights from Latin America", Journal of Economic Inequality, 4(1), pp.107~122 (2006)
- 구재선, "한국인, 누가 언제 행복한가?", 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 25(2), pp.143~166 (2011), 한국사회및성격심리학회[DOI]
- Hafstrom, J. L., "Level of living : Factors influencing the homemaker’s satisfaction", Home Economics Research Journal, 2(2), pp.119~132 (1973)
- 가영희, "성인의 직장-가정갈등이 영역별 만족도와 주관적 삶의 질에 미치는 영향", 한국심리학회지:여성, 11(2), pp.163~186 (2006), 한국여성심리학회
- Kelley, S. M. C., "Subjective Social Mobility: Data from 30 Nations, Charting the Globe: The International Social Survey Programme", ~ (2009)
- 김대환, "한국사회에서 사회경제적 지위 개선 가능성에 대한 주관적 평가의 변화", 연구방법논총, 6(3), pp.107~134 (2021), 사회과학기초자료연구소[DOI]
- 김재우, "한국인의 주관적 사회계층, 기회공정성 인식, 그리고 삶의 만족도: 성별･연령집단별 매개과정과 조절작용", 행정논총, 57(4), pp.97~127 (2019), 한국행정연구소[DOI]
- 김종일, "장애인근로자의 장애수용, 차별경험,사회경제적 지위가 직무만족과 생활만족에 미치는 영향", 장애와 고용, 23(4), pp.59~84 (2013), 한국장애인고용공단 고용개발원[DOI]
- 이재완, "계층이동 사다리가 사회신뢰에 미치는 효과에 관한 탐색적 연구: 비선형관계를 중심으로", 한국사회와 행정연구, 24(3), pp.189~223 (2013), 서울행정학회
- 이용관, "청년층의 주관적 계층의식과 계층이동 가능성영향요인 변화 분석", 보건사회연구, 38(4), pp.465~491 (2018), 한국보건사회연구원[DOI]
- 이연경, "사회계층이 행복에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 객관적 계층과 주관적 계층의식을 중심으로", 행정논총, 55(1), pp.1~39 (2017), 한국행정연구소
- Porter, L. W., "Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians", Journal of applied psychology, 59(5), pp.603~ (1974)
- Ravallion, M., "Who wants to redistribute? The tunnel effect in 1990s Russia", Journal of Public Economics, 76(1), pp.87~104 (2000)
- 서은철, "장애인근로자의 지각된 사회경제적 지위와 일상생활만족의 종단적 인과모형", 장애와 고용, 24(2), pp.37~66 (2014), 한국장애인고용공단 고용개발원[DOI]
- 심의선, "아동보호전문기관 종사자의 직장 행복이 조직몰입에 미치는 영향연구", 사회복지정책, 46(1), pp.5~31 (2019), 한국사회복지정책학회[DOI]
- Spreitzer, G., "Creating sustainable performance", Harvard Business Review, 90(1), pp.92~99 (2012)
- Veenhoven, R., "Is happiness a trait? Tests of the theory that a better society does not make people any happier", Social indicators research, 32(2), pp.101~160 (1994)
- 양동민, "주관적 사회경제적 지위가 직무성과 및 조직몰입에 미치는 영향: LMX와 CWX의 매개효과", 기업경영연구, 28(3), pp.105~128 (2021), 한국기업경영학회
- 윤인진, "사회경제적 지위와 주관적 계층의식이 생활만족에 미치는 영향 -고급여가활용의 매개효과분석-", 도시행정학보, 21(2), pp.153~185 (2008), 한국도시행정학회