수사구조개혁의 경제적 효과
An Economic Effects of Structural Reform at Criminal Investigation
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is a nation's duty that investigates the criminal, arrest a suspect, and levies a punishment to the criminal. For this, the police and the prosecution exist. The power of the nation is in principle divided into the legislative, the judicial, and the administrative branches by constitutional law. The reason is because of preventing the monopoly of authority and planning the check and a balance of each agencies. This can make the people guaranteed their own freedom and right completely. From like this viewpoint, current relationship between the police and the prosecution is unfair. The relationship between the police and the prosecution is not a conciliation but a dominant-subordinate relationship. The investigation structural reform is necessary now. The investigation structural reform would be in the best interests of the police, the prosecution, and people. Especially an economical point of view, the investigation structural reform does to become accomplished certainly. People can reduce their costs and cut down their expenses when they are investigated by the police and the prosecution.
Abstract
It is a nation's duty that investigates the criminal, arrest a suspect, and levies a punishment to the criminal. For this, the police and the prosecution exist. The power of the nation is in principle divided into the legislative, the judicial, and the administrative branches by constitutional law. The reason is because of preventing the monopoly of authority and planning the check and a balance of each agencies. This can make the people guaranteed their own freedom and right completely. From like this viewpoint, current relationship between the police and the prosecution is unfair. The relationship between the police and the prosecution is not a conciliation but a dominant-subordinate relationship. The investigation structural reform is necessary now. The investigation structural reform would be in the best interests of the police, the prosecution, and people. Especially an economical point of view, the investigation structural reform does to become accomplished certainly. People can reduce their costs and cut down their expenses when they are investigated by the police and the prosecution.
참고문헌 (27)
- 김명수, "공공정책평가론" (2003), 박영사
- 김용세, "현행 수사권체제의 문제점과 개선방안", 대전대학교 사회과학논문집 (2000)
- 김윤상, "수사지휘권과 인권보장", 한국형사정책학회 춘계학술대회논문집 (2003)
- 김윤상, "수사지휘권과 인권보장", 형사정책, 15(1) (2003)
- 김준성, "검-경 수사권 조정에 관한 쟁점검토", 영남법학, 11(1) (2005)
- 김충남, "경찰학개론" (2008), 박영사
- 김충남, "경찰수사론" (2008), 박영사
- 나기산, "정책분석론" (1994), 법문사
- 단성한, "배심재판에서의 법관, 검사, 변호인의 지위 및 역할변화", 비교형사법연구, 9(2), pp.1~36 (2007), 한국비교형사법학회
- 박기석, "현행 검·경관계의 문제점과 경찰의 책임수사 원리", 비교형사법연구, 5(2-1), pp.9~292 (2003), 한국비교형사법학회
- 박기찬, "경영의 교양을 읽는다" (2005), 더난출판
- 신동운, "한국검찰제도의 현황과 개선대책", 서울대법학, 29(2) (1998)
- 이재상, "형사소송법" (1997), 박영사
- 이진국, "수사권독립 논의에 관한 검토", 형사정책연구, 14(2), pp.5~202 (2003), 한국형사정책연구원
- 정진연, "국민참여재판과 형사재판의 소송주체의 역할 비교", 법학논총, 19, pp.133~160 (2008), 법학연구소
- 정인연, "국민참여재판에서 한국형 배심제의 도입", 법학논총, 15 (2006)
- 조병선, "경찰수사권 독립에 관한 비교법적ㆍ법사학적인 입문적 고찰", 수사연구 (1992)
- 차용석, "경찰수사권 독립에 관한 연구", 수사연구 (1993)
- 경찰수사제도의 개선에 관한 전략적 방안연구, "표창원", 치안정책연구소, ~ (2005)
- 경찰수사제도의 개선에 관한 연구, "표창원", 치안정책연구소, ~ (2005)
- 한인섭, "국민참여재판 하에서 경찰 역할의 변화", 형사정책, 18(2), pp.525~558 (2006), 한국형사정책학회
- 허일태, "독일과 프랑스의 수사권 배분에 관한 비교법적 고찰", 비교형사법연구, 6(1), pp.145~182 (2004), 한국비교형사법학회
- 경찰청, "경찰백서" (2007)
- 한국행정연구원, "공무원의 의식과 행태에 관한 연구" (1992)
- 형사정책연구원, "형사소송법제정자료집" (1990)
- Maslow, Abraham, "A Theory of Human Motivation", Psychological Review, 43 (1943)
- Vroom, Victor, "Work and Motivation" (1964), John Wiley & Sons