다문화가족의 특수한 해체(이혼)원인과 친권ㆍ양육권의 결정
The special Dismantling cause of multicultural families and ParentalㆍCustody decision
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Disband when the custody of multicultural families in determining the priority is to consider the welfare of the child. However, due to the uniqueness of multicultural families in determining custody and custody are a few considerations. First, multicultural families, most of the configuration is composed of immigrant women is that. Second, those immigrant women who immigrated from developing countries if there is a lot. Third, immigrants would occupy most of the marriage as the path is due to get married is that brokerage firms. Fourth, their families suffer economic hardship from the economy of marriage is that. Fifth, the legal status of immigrant women, even within the family is uneasy. In a foreign country, as well as ways of caring for a parent to specify the cases in general. However, given the different circumstances, multicultural families disintegrate when the child's guardian and the guardian of the wealth of the parents would be reasonable to specify, I guess. Child's welfare first and foremost to our civil law, even the right direction, thought it was, immigrant women and guardians and caregivers If you specify a women's economic status declines in addition to the foreigners from the present situation of their economic decline, further accelerating the concerns there. That is, except for special cases are put on the absolute poverty of children think that parenting is almost impossible. Therefore, in the short term to call the custodian and guardian might be reasonable to specify. But in the long term, considering the child's emotional stability to specify arbitrary ways, seems to be suitable for compounding. If the dissolution of multicultural families and guardians who will decide an issue that is important but more important, it is multicultural families keep their children in the protection of parents to grow up healthy, I think. But a divorce causes discussed earlier, the path of the spouses met the married immigrant women, many of the agencies met by a spouse, a significantly shorter length of stay of these points to us that is very suggestive. Marriage by marriage brokers, the real intention of the marriage do not understand, the conditions are often just leads to marriage.
Abstract
Disband when the custody of multicultural families in determining the priority is to consider the welfare of the child. However, due to the uniqueness of multicultural families in determining custody and custody are a few considerations. First, multicultural families, most of the configuration is composed of immigrant women is that. Second, those immigrant women who immigrated from developing countries if there is a lot. Third, immigrants would occupy most of the marriage as the path is due to get married is that brokerage firms. Fourth, their families suffer economic hardship from the economy of marriage is that. Fifth, the legal status of immigrant women, even within the family is uneasy. In a foreign country, as well as ways of caring for a parent to specify the cases in general. However, given the different circumstances, multicultural families disintegrate when the child's guardian and the guardian of the wealth of the parents would be reasonable to specify, I guess. Child's welfare first and foremost to our civil law, even the right direction, thought it was, immigrant women and guardians and caregivers If you specify a women's economic status declines in addition to the foreigners from the present situation of their economic decline, further accelerating the concerns there. That is, except for special cases are put on the absolute poverty of children think that parenting is almost impossible. Therefore, in the short term to call the custodian and guardian might be reasonable to specify. But in the long term, considering the child's emotional stability to specify arbitrary ways, seems to be suitable for compounding. If the dissolution of multicultural families and guardians who will decide an issue that is important but more important, it is multicultural families keep their children in the protection of parents to grow up healthy, I think. But a divorce causes discussed earlier, the path of the spouses met the married immigrant women, many of the agencies met by a spouse, a significantly shorter length of stay of these points to us that is very suggestive. Marriage by marriage brokers, the real intention of the marriage do not understand, the conditions are often just leads to marriage.
참고문헌 (21)
- 곽동헌, "이혼 후의 친자관계 -친권과 양육권을 중심으로", 법학논고 (1997), 경북대학교 법학연구소
- 구차순, "결혼이주여성의 다문화가족 적응에 관한 연구", 한국가족복지학, (20), pp.319~360 (2007), 한국가족사회복지학회
- 권정희, "이혼에서 자녀보호를 위한 법적 고찰", 가족법연구, 15(1) (2001)
- 김명숙, "子의 복리와 친권, 子의 권리", 안암법학, (28), pp.73~114 (2009), 안암법학회
- 2009년 전국다문화가족실태조사연구, "김승권", 한국보건사회연구원, ~ (2010)
- 김승권, "다양한 가족의 출현과 사회적 지원체계 구축방안" (2004), 한국보건사회연구원
- 김유경, "다문화시대를 대비한 복지정책방안 연구 -다문화가족을 중심으로" (2008), 한국보건사회연구원
- 남인숙, "결혼이민여성 가족의 출신국 문화이해", 사회이론, (35), pp.7~30 (2009), 한국사회이론학회
- 가족의 다양화에 다른 관련법제 정비연구, "박선영", 한국여성정책연구원, ~ (2008)
- 여성빈곤 퇴치를 위한 정책개발 연구, "박영란", 한국여성개발원, ~ (2003)
- 가족유형에 따른 생활실태와복지욕구에 따른 연구, "변화순", 한국여성개발원, ~ (2001)
- 서종남, "결혼이민자 가정의 문제점과 해결방안 연구", 시민교육연구, 42(1), pp.103~126 (2010), 한국사회과교육학회
- 석재은, "취약계층 여성정책의 발전방향 연구" (2006), 여성가족부
- 석재은, "여성의 빈곤실태 분석과 탈빈곤 정책과제 개발" (2003), 보건복지부ㆍ한국보건사회연구원
- 소성규, "결혼이민자 인식조사를 통한 다문화가족 법제도의 개선방향 - 포천시 사례를 중심으로 -", 법과정책연구, 10(2), pp.477~513 (2010), 한국법정책학회
- 양창수, "친권법의 기본문제", 서울대학교 법학, 102 (1996)
- 오시영, "친족상속법" (2006), 학현사
- 이화숙, "자의 최대의 이익과 현행친권제도(상)", 사법행정, 27(8) (1986)
- 정혜영, "다문화가족자녀의 권리보호", 안암법학, (27), pp.1~38 (2008), 안암법학회
- 황은숙, "한부모가정복지정책의 현황과 개선방안, 한부모가정 복지정책 달라져야 한다", 송파구 여성주간 및 한국한부모가정학회 창립기념 학술대회 (2008)
- 홍춘의, "친족법에서의 자의 복리개념", 민사법학, (36), pp.645~668 (2007), 한국민사법학회
