4Q246과 다니엘 7장의 상관관계에 관한 연구
A Study on the Correlation between 4Q246 and Dan. 7
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Purpose of this paper is to reveal the identity of 4Q246, Daiel Apocryphon through the literary comparison with Daiel 7. and to read the theology of Qumran community transcribed in the scroll, 4Q246. After 4Q246 was presented by J. T. Milik in a lecture given at Harvard University in 1972 and was made known by J. A. Fitzmyer in his study, this scroll has made a big issues for a long time being. The main question of 4Q246(Aramaic Apocalypse) is the identity of the designated "Son of God." We can have two views of that, a positive figure or a negative figure. J. T. Milik insists that the "Son of God" refers to a Seleucid king, referring Antiochus IV Epiphanes. Florentino Garcia Martinez suggests that it is an angelic savior like Michael, Melchizedek, and the Prince of Light. And other scholars view the figure as a messianic redeemer who will cast God's enemies away and build the kingdom of God's people (Cross, Collins, Hengel, Kuhn). Exceptionally, David Flusser insists that he is the Antichrist, and Martin Hengel insists that he is the Jewish people collectively. E. Puech believes that the Son of the Most High could be either the future Davidic Messiah or a historical Seleucid pretender. Joseph A. Fitzmyer argues that what the Son of God refers is not a messiah, but a coming Jewish ruler, perhaps a member of the Hasmonean dynasty. According to the scholars, therefore, the title "Son of God" would be either a historical character, a heavenly figure or a messianic human being. But, most importantly, it should be noticed that they in fact have not seen the text itself; for example its structure, feature, theme than the vague figure in scroll. With literary criticism and historical view, we have to review the text of this scroll. Through its methodology, we can find the structure, feature, terminolo- gy similar to the book of Daniel, expecially Ch. 7. Martin Hengel suggests that the figure is similar to "the one like a Son of Man" in Daniel 7: 13-14. Furthermore two texts that have same apocalyptic structure and feature seem to say that the author of 4Q246 was influenced by Daniel 7. The two texts reveal such an extensive degree of verbal, thematic, and structural correspondences. Therefore we can conclude that 4Q246 is the Apocryphon of Daniel, but the debate about the identity of son of God in 4Q246 is still valid. And Qumran community wants to read their hope, coming redeemer saving the people, the qumran theology, habits, and beliefs in this scroll.
Abstract
The Purpose of this paper is to reveal the identity of 4Q246, Daiel Apocryphon through the literary comparison with Daiel 7. and to read the theology of Qumran community transcribed in the scroll, 4Q246. After 4Q246 was presented by J. T. Milik in a lecture given at Harvard University in 1972 and was made known by J. A. Fitzmyer in his study, this scroll has made a big issues for a long time being. The main question of 4Q246(Aramaic Apocalypse) is the identity of the designated "Son of God." We can have two views of that, a positive figure or a negative figure. J. T. Milik insists that the "Son of God" refers to a Seleucid king, referring Antiochus IV Epiphanes. Florentino Garcia Martinez suggests that it is an angelic savior like Michael, Melchizedek, and the Prince of Light. And other scholars view the figure as a messianic redeemer who will cast God's enemies away and build the kingdom of God's people (Cross, Collins, Hengel, Kuhn). Exceptionally, David Flusser insists that he is the Antichrist, and Martin Hengel insists that he is the Jewish people collectively. E. Puech believes that the Son of the Most High could be either the future Davidic Messiah or a historical Seleucid pretender. Joseph A. Fitzmyer argues that what the Son of God refers is not a messiah, but a coming Jewish ruler, perhaps a member of the Hasmonean dynasty. According to the scholars, therefore, the title "Son of God" would be either a historical character, a heavenly figure or a messianic human being. But, most importantly, it should be noticed that they in fact have not seen the text itself; for example its structure, feature, theme than the vague figure in scroll. With literary criticism and historical view, we have to review the text of this scroll. Through its methodology, we can find the structure, feature, terminolo- gy similar to the book of Daniel, expecially Ch. 7. Martin Hengel suggests that the figure is similar to "the one like a Son of Man" in Daniel 7: 13-14. Furthermore two texts that have same apocalyptic structure and feature seem to say that the author of 4Q246 was influenced by Daniel 7. The two texts reveal such an extensive degree of verbal, thematic, and structural correspondences. Therefore we can conclude that 4Q246 is the Apocryphon of Daniel, but the debate about the identity of son of God in 4Q246 is still valid. And Qumran community wants to read their hope, coming redeemer saving the people, the qumran theology, habits, and beliefs in this scroll.
참고문헌 (35)
- 김 창선, "쿰란 에센파와 묵시문학", 신약논단, 11(4), pp.871~893 (2004)
- 왕 대일, "묵시문학 다니엘서에 수록된 상징 이해", 신학과세계, (45), pp.5~22 (2002)
- 왕 대일, "묵시문학 운동의 역사이해-말세의식과 종말의식", 기독교사상, (386), pp.37~50 (1991)
- 왕 대일, "인자 같은 이(단 7: 13): 구약신학적 모색", 신학과세계, (48), pp.116~132 (2003)
- 왕 대일, "묵시문학연구" (1994), 대한기독교서회
- 왕 대일, "묵시문학과 종말론" (2004), 대한기독교서회
- 이 형의, "유대 묵시문학에 이방인 심판 구원", 기독교사상, (330), pp.106~119 (1986)
- Brown, R. E, "The Gospel According to John ⅰ-?, AB 29", pp.84~ (1966), Doubleday
- Charlesworth, J. H, "Christological Titles in Early Christianity,” The Messiahs", pp.425~448 (1992), Fortress Press
- Collins, J. J, "The Apocalyptic Vision of the Book of Daniel, Harvard Semitic Monographs 16", pp.144~147 (1977), Scholars Press
- Collins, J. J., "The Son of God Text from Qumran, From Jesus to John: Essays on Jesus and New Testament Christology in Honour of Marinus de Jonge (JSTNSup 84),", pp.65~82 (1993), JSOT Press
- Collins, J. J, "The Son of Man in First-Century Judaism", New Testament Studies, 38, pp.448~466 (1992)
- Cross, F. M, "Notes on the Doctrine of the Two Messiahs at Qumran and the Extracanonical Daniel Apocalypse (4Q246),” Current Research and Technological Developments on the Dead Sea Scrolls", pp.1~13 (1996), E. J. Brill
- Eisenman, R., "The Son of God (4Q246),” The Dead Sea Scrolls Uncovered", pp.1992, M. Wise
- Fitzmyer, J. A, "4Q246: The Son of God Document from Qumran", Biblica, 74, pp.153~174 (1993)
- Fitzmyer, J. A, "The Contribution of Qumran Aramaic to the Study of the New Testament", NTS, 20, pp.382~407 (1974)
- Fitzmyer, J. A, "The Genesis Apocryphon of Qumran Cave I,” Biblica et Orientalia 18A", pp.151~ (1971), Biblical Institute Press
- Fitzmyer, J. A, "A Wandering Aramean. Collected Aramaic Essays,” SBL Monograph Series 25", pp.85~107 (1979), Scholars Press
- Fitzmyer,J.A, "The Dead Sea Scrolls and Christian Origins" (2000), Wm.B.Eerdmans
- Flusser,D, "Judaism and the Origins of Christianity" (1988), Magnes Press
- Flusser, D, "The Hubris of the Antichrist in a Fragment from Qumran", Immanuel, 10, pp.31~37 (1980)
- Hartman, Louis E, "The Book of Daniel, AB 23", pp.202~220 (1977), Doubleday
- Hengel, M, "AChristological Titles in Early Christianity, The Messiah", pp.425~448, Fortess Press
- Josephus, F, "Jewish Antiquities XII, Louis H. Feldman (trans.), Loeb Classical Library: Books 18-19", pp.237~434 (1965), Harvard University Press
- Kuhn, G, "Rom 1,3f und der davidische Messias als Gottessohn in den Qumran- texten, Lese-Zeichen fur Annelies Findreiß zum 65. Geburtstag am 15. Marz 1984", pp.103~113 (1984), Carl Winter
- Martinez, F. G., "The eschatological figure of 4Q246, Qumran and Apocalyptic: Studies on the Aramaic Texts from Qumran (STDJ 9)", pp.162~179 (1992), E. J. Brill
- Mart?ez, F. G, "Tigchelaar, The Dead Sea Scroll: Study Edition" (2000), Wm. B. Eerdmans
- Milik, J. T, "The Books of Enoch, Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4" (1976), Clarendon
- Puech, E, "Fragment d’une apocalypse en arameen (4Q246=pseudo-Dan) et le ‘Royaume de Dieu’", RB, 99, pp.105~ (1992)
- Puech, E, "Fragments d’un apocryphe de Levi et le personnage eschatologique. 4QTestLevia - de et 4QAJ, Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah (STDJ 11)", pp.449~501 (1992), E. J. Brill
- Puech, E, "Une apocalypse messianique (4Q521)", RQ, 15(60), pp.475~522 (1992)
- Puech, E, "Qumran Grotte 4. XXII: Textes arameens, premiere partie: 4Q529?549 (DJD XXXI)", pp.239~244 (2001), Clarendon
- Vermes, G, "Qumran Forum Miscellanea Ⅰ", JJS, 43, pp.299~305 (1992)
- Vermes, G, "The Oxford Forum for Qumran Research: Seminar on the Rule of War from Cave 4 (4Q285)", JJS, 43, pp.85~94 (1992)
- Vermes,G, "The Dead Sea Scroll in English" (1995), Penguin Books Ltd.