본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

느헤미야와 포로 후기 예언자들이 선포한 ‘예루살렘 성벽의 파괴와 복구’에 관한 연구

A Study on ‘the Destruction and Restoration of the Walls of Jerusalem’ in the Proclamations of Nehemiah and Other Post-Exilic Prophets

이희학
한국구약학회 (Korean Society of Old Testament Studies)|2020.09|구약논단 (Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies)|제26권 제3호|pp. 106-140|DOI 10.24333/jkots.2020.26.3.106

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

느헤미야Nehemiah제3이사야장미와 라벤더 향예루살렘 성벽의 파괴와 복구포로 후기 예언 문헌 전통사 연구Destruction and restoration of the walls of JerusalemPost-exilic prophetic textsTradition criticismThe trito-IsaiahRoses and lavenders
주제분류기독교신학

초록

바벨론 포로에서 돌아온 이후 예언자들은 예루살렘이 가지고 있던 중차대한 신앙적 의미에 근거하여 이스라엘의 회복을 예루살렘 성벽의 복구라는 차원에서 선포하였다. 예루살렘 성벽의 복구는 이스라엘 회복의 신앙적 상징으로 간주된 것인데, 예루살렘 성벽의 파괴와 복구에 대해 느헤미야와 포로 후기 예언자들이 선포한 메시지를 전통사적인 관점에서 상호 비교 분석하려는 것이 본 논문의 목적이다.

Abstract

After the Babylonian captivity ended, returning prophets proclaimed Israel’s restoration in the way to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem based on the important faith that Jerusalem temple had. The purpose of this article is to explore the messages of Nehemiah and other post-exilic prophets about the destruction and restoration of the walls of Jerusalem in the view point of tradition criticism, pointing out that the process of rebuilding the walls implied the faithful symbol of Israel’s restoration. Nehemiah 1:3; 2:13; 4:3, 7; 6:1 explain the destruction of the walls of Jerusalem and city itself, utilizing Hebrew verb ‘fall’(#rp) in all these five verses. The topic of the destruction of the walls of Jerusalem and it’s restoration appears in the trito-Isaiah texts(Isa. 58:12; 60:10-11, 18; 61:4; 62:6-12; 64:9-11) which are evaluated as one of the post-exilic prophetic texts. By using various terms, they proclaim that the ruin of Jerusalem is the symbol of the old age, and the restoration of the walls is the new symbol of the new age. Furthermore, this topic is found in the eschatological texts(Amos 9:11-15; Micah 7:11) which were generally evaluated as the work of the final redactor of the post-exilic period. It is Isaiah 58:12 and 61:4 to show textual similarities related to the rebuilding process of Jerusalem in the book of Nehemiah. These two verses point a deep intertextual relationship as they look like the same. They equally use the form of the proclamation of restoration, convince that the old ruin will be restored for the mourner, and promise that the broken cities will be renewed. Here, we find the connecting point in relation to the motive of ‘the destruction(#rp) and rebuilding(hnb) of the walls’ mentioned in Nehemiah and Isaiah texts. Prophecies concerning judgment and restoration of Jerusalem appear on the eschatological texts(Amos 9:11-15; Micah 7:11) which are viewed as an addition during the post-exilic period. One common point between Amos 9:11 and Isaiah 58:12 is that only in these verses, the verb ‘wall up’(rdg) is used with the object ‘breach’(#r,P,) in the Bible. Moreover, the thematic words, such as set up(~wq), build(hnb), and old(~l'A[) mentioned in Amos 9:11 suggest very similar commonality to Isaiah 58:12 and 61:4. In the traditional view point, Isaiah 58:12, 61:4, and Amos 9:11, 14 stand at the same tradition in that Micah 7:11 strongly expects the restoration of Jerusalem(Judah). In conclusion, this article argues that Nehemiah and other prophetic texts edited in the post-exilic period utilize very diverse terms and motives to point the destruction of Jerusalem and restoration of the fallen walls. In some cases, without any special relations, they use other words to depict the events. However, overall they share common words in order to suggest that the desolated Jerusalem will be renewed and the walls will be restored, and finally the destructed cities will be rebuilt. To restore the walls of Jerusalem and especially the ‘breaches’ of the fallen walls were proclaimed as the sign of entering the new restoration period. This article proves that the trito-Isaiah and some eschatological texts of Amos and Micah, attributed to the post-exilic final editor, have deep intertextual relations to Nehemiah text in the research based on the tradition criticism.

참고문헌 (53)

  1. 김래용, "에스라 9-10장과 느헤미야 13장의 특징과 역할", 구약논단, 16(4), pp.33~53 (2010), 한국구약학회[DOI]
  2. 마이어스, J. M., "에스라·느헤미야" (1983), 한국신학연구소
  3. 민경진, "에스라-느헤미야서의 레위계 기원: 역사적 맥락", 구약논단, 17, pp.78~100 (2005)
  4. 민경진, "느헤미야13장, 세 질문으로 다시 읽기", 구약논단, 24(2), pp.37~61 (2018), 한국구약학회[DOI]
  5. 박철우, "에스라 - 느헤미야서의 스토리 전개 패턴과 신학", 구약논단, 22(1), pp.125~156 (2016), 한국구약학회[DOI]
  6. 이윤경, "느헤미야, 산발랏, 도비야의 관계를 통해서 본 느헤미야 개혁", 한국기독교신학논총, (86), pp.5~29 (2013), 한국기독교학회
  7. 장춘식, "대한기독교서회 창립 100주년 기념 성서주석 14" (2007), 대한기독교서회
  8. 최인기, "아모스서의 문학적 구조와 문학단위 분할의 문제", 구약논단, 7, pp.69~90 (1999)
  9. 최종원, "아모스 8-9장에 나타난 희망의 신탁에 관한 연구", 구약논단, 23(4), pp.119~149 (2017), 한국구약학회[DOI]
  10. Barre, M. L., "A Cuneiform Parallel to Ps 86:16-17 and Mic 7:16-17", JBL, 101, pp.271~275 (1982)
  11. Bauer, J. B., "Der ‘Fuchs’ Neh 3,35 ein Belagerungsturm?", BZ N.F., 19, pp.97~98 (1975)
  12. Blenkinsopp, J., "Ezra-Nehemiah. Old Testament Library" (1988), Westminster Press
  13. Conrad, J., "TDOT XII", pp.104~114 (2003)
  14. Cornill, C. H., "Das Buch des Propheten Ezechiel" (1886), Ninrichs
  15. Donner, H., "Geschichte des Volkes Israel und seiner Nachbarn in Grundzügen 1" (1995), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
  16. Eissfeldt, O., "Ein Psalm aus Nord-Israel. Mica 7,7-20", ZDMG, 112, pp.259~268 (1962)
  17. Everson, A. J., "The Days of Yahweh", JBL, 93, pp.329~337 (1974)
  18. Grätz, S., "Der strafende Wettergott. Erwägungen zur Traditionsgeschichte des AdadßFluchs im Alten Orient und Alten testament" (1998), Philo Verlag
  19. Hadjiev, T. S., "BZAW 393" (2009), Walter de Gruyter
  20. Jeremias, J., "Der Prophet Amos. ATD 24,2" (1995), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
  21. Koene, K., "Ethik und Eschatologie im Tritojesajabuch: Eine literarkritische und redaktionsgeschichtliche Studien(WMANT 62)" (1990), Neukirchener Verlag
  22. Kraetzschmar, R., "Das Buch Ezechiel" (1900), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
  23. Kutscher, E. Y., "Hebrew and Aramaic Studies", pp.70~89 (1977), Magnes Press
  24. Lau, W., "Schriftgelehrte Prophetie in Jes 56-66" (1994), W. de Gruyter
  25. Levin, Ch., "Das Amosbuch der Anawim", ZThK, 94, pp.407~436 (1997)
  26. Mays, J. L., "Amos: A Commentary" (1969), Westminster
  27. Morgenstern, J., "Is 63,7-14", HUCA, 23, pp.187~203 (1950)
  28. Mosis, R., "Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament. Vol.VI", pp.109~121 (1982), Eerdmans
  29. Olmstead, A. T., "History of the Persian Empire" (1948), University Press
  30. Pauritsch, K., "AnBib 47" (1971), Biblical Institute Press
  31. Podella, Th., "Sȏm-Fasten: Kollektive Trauer um den verborgenen Gott im Alten Testament" (1989), Neukirchener Verlag
  32. Reicke, B., "Liturgical Traditions in Micah 7", HTR, 60, pp.349~367 (1967)
  33. Rottzoll, D. U., "BZAW 243" (1996), de Gruyter
  34. Saley, R. J., "Biblical and Near Eastern Studies. Essays in Honor of William Sanford LaSor", pp.151~165 (1978), Eerdmans
  35. Schmidt, W. H., "Die deuteronomistische Redaktion des Amosbuches. Zu den theologischen Unterschieden zwischen den Propheten und seinen Sammlern", Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, 77, pp.168~193 (1965)
  36. Sekine, S., "Die Tritojesajanische Sammlung(Jes 56-66) redaktionsgeschichtlich untersucht" (1989), W. de Gruyter
  37. Selms, A. van, "The Origin of the Name Tyropoeon in Jerusalem", ZAW, 91, pp.170~176 (1979)
  38. Steck, O. H., "BZAW 203" (1991), W. de Gruyter
  39. Steck, O. H., "Exegese des Alten Testaments. Leitfaden der Mothodik. Ein Arbeitsbuch für Proseminare, Seminare und Vorlesungen" (1994), Neukirchener Verlag
  40. Watts, J. D. W., "WBC 25" (1987), Word Books
  41. Weiser, A., "Die Propheten Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadja, Jona, Micha. ATD 24" (1985), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
  42. Wellhausen, J., "Die kleinen Propheten" (1964), Verlag J. Guttentag
  43. Welten, P., "Kulthöhe und Jahwetempel", ZDPV, 88, pp.19~37 (1972)
  44. Westermann, C., "ATD 19" (1986), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
  45. Whybray, R. N., "Isaiah 40-66(NCBC)" (1975), Eerdmans
  46. Williamson, H. G. M., "Nehemiah’s Wall Revisited", PEQ, 116, pp.81~88 (1984)
  47. Williamson, H. G. M., "WBC 16" (1985), Word Books
  48. Willis, J. T., "A Reapplied Prophetic Hope Oracle", Studies on Prophecy, pp.64~76 (1974)
  49. 2, "Dodekapropheton 2: Joel und Amos. BK XIV", pp.1985, Wolff, H. W.
  50. 4, "Dodekapropheton 4: Micha. BK XIV", pp.1982, Wolff, H. W.
  51. Wöhrle, J., "Die frühen Sammlungen des Zwölfprophetenbuches. Entstehung und Komposition" (2006), Walter de Gruyter
  52. Yadin, Y., "The Art of Warfare in Biblical Lands" (1963), McGraw-Hill
  53. Zimmerli, W., "Archäologie und Altes Testament", pp.299~319 (1970), J. C. B. Mohr

관련 논문AI추천

에스라-느헤미야서의 ‘성전과 성벽 완공’에 대한 상관관계 고찰김영호한국구약학회 · 구약논단2024 · 제30권 제1호예레미야서의 70년 포로생활예언의 의미김진규한국복음주의신학회 · 성경과 신학2018 · 제88권 포로이해를 통해 본 예언서의 리더십: 대예언서를 중심으로배정훈한국구약학회 · 구약논단2016 · 제22권 제3호에스라-느헤미야서의 연구사: 1990년부터 현재까지김래용한국구약학회 · 구약논단2014 · 제20권 제4호구약 예언서에 나타난 아브라함 상차준희한국구약학회 · 구약논단2012 · 제18권 제2호에스라-느헤미야 연구 서설김선종한국구약학회 · 구약논단2019 · 제25권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)

에스겔서의 3단계 구조에서 고이의 기능김래용pp. 14-43출애굽기 1-2장에 나타난 이데올로기에 대한 텍스트의 문학적 전략 분석김성진, 김상래pp. 44-69레위기 18-20장의 문학적 및 신학적 의미에 대한 연구: 레위기의 문학적 구조와 관련하여노세영pp. 70-105신명기 22장 13-29절에 나타난 성윤리와 성범죄에 대한 현대적 적용박유미pp. 142-171난민과 난민수용정책을 위한 시편 23편의 메타포 연구이일례pp. 172-200
원문 보기