북 왕국 멸망의 사회적 원인들과 예언자 아모스의 심판 선포
The Social Causes of the Northern Kingdom's Fall and Prophet Amos's Judgement Proclamation
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Northern Kingdom of Israel was economically and politically stable in the early and the middle of the 8th century B.C., compared to other period. The purpose of this paper is to examine the social circumstances of the Northern Kingdom at the period, to analyze the causes that affected the Israel's social crises, and to find the meaning and legacy of the theological controversy, implied in the judgment proclamation of Amos. During the reign of the king, Jeroboam II, the Northern Kingdom had experienced more political stability and economical prosperity than any other period. Yet, unfortunately this newly gained economical prosperity and wealth had not been evenly distributed to all the people. Economical wealth, earned through international trades, enriched mostly not the country but the city residents. The more international peace had persisted and international trades had been active, the more economical wealth had been accumulated. However, it more widened the gap between the rich and the poor, and more landlords and rich people arose. The growth of the number of the rich landlords and the increase of the poor tenant farmers weakened the bond of the families and caused the radical change of the traditional communal relationship. The farmers who lost their land hopelessly had to face economical difficulties, rapid urbanization and extent individualism. Although the Northern Kingdom seemed outwardly developing and prospering, prophet Amos was keenly aware of the causes of the internal collapse of the society. The leaders of the society were enjoying the expansion of the kingdom and its economical growth, but in the name of God Amos criticized their sins and proclaimed God's judgment against them, which would bring them to a total collapse. For Amos, they were the ones who destroyed the traditional basic norm system, that is, the equalitarian relationship, but hardly felt their responsibility for weakening such Yahweh religion. They were also the nonsensible who did not feel guilty, although they were destroying ‘justice’(ט) and ‘righteousness’(ה), which consisted of the foundation of the Israeli society. They were the ones who rejected the moral request of Yahweh. Amos proclaimed that Yahweh would no more ignore the immoral situation and judge the whole of the sinful Northern Kingdom through justice and power of liberation, as he had proved through the long history of Israel. Amos understood the social evil from the point of the whole Israeli history, so that the relation between Yahweh and the Northern Kingdom confronted the cruel crisis because of the sins the leaders of the society committed.
Abstract
The Northern Kingdom of Israel was economically and politically stable in the early and the middle of the 8th century B.C., compared to other period. The purpose of this paper is to examine the social circumstances of the Northern Kingdom at the period, to analyze the causes that affected the Israel's social crises, and to find the meaning and legacy of the theological controversy, implied in the judgment proclamation of Amos. During the reign of the king, Jeroboam II, the Northern Kingdom had experienced more political stability and economical prosperity than any other period. Yet, unfortunately this newly gained economical prosperity and wealth had not been evenly distributed to all the people. Economical wealth, earned through international trades, enriched mostly not the country but the city residents. The more international peace had persisted and international trades had been active, the more economical wealth had been accumulated. However, it more widened the gap between the rich and the poor, and more landlords and rich people arose. The growth of the number of the rich landlords and the increase of the poor tenant farmers weakened the bond of the families and caused the radical change of the traditional communal relationship. The farmers who lost their land hopelessly had to face economical difficulties, rapid urbanization and extent individualism. Although the Northern Kingdom seemed outwardly developing and prospering, prophet Amos was keenly aware of the causes of the internal collapse of the society. The leaders of the society were enjoying the expansion of the kingdom and its economical growth, but in the name of God Amos criticized their sins and proclaimed God's judgment against them, which would bring them to a total collapse. For Amos, they were the ones who destroyed the traditional basic norm system, that is, the equalitarian relationship, but hardly felt their responsibility for weakening such Yahweh religion. They were also the nonsensible who did not feel guilty, although they were destroying ‘justice’(ט) and ‘righteousness’(ה), which consisted of the foundation of the Israeli society. They were the ones who rejected the moral request of Yahweh. Amos proclaimed that Yahweh would no more ignore the immoral situation and judge the whole of the sinful Northern Kingdom through justice and power of liberation, as he had proved through the long history of Israel. Amos understood the social evil from the point of the whole Israeli history, so that the relation between Yahweh and the Northern Kingdom confronted the cruel crisis because of the sins the leaders of the society committed.
참고문헌 (19)
- 노 세영, "죽이는 속죄제물에서 ?????(kipper) 의미의 연구 - 제사장 신학을 중심으로", 구약논단, 19, pp.31~52 (2005)
- 박 종수, "아모스 5:1-17 연구", 구약논단, 5, pp.97~132 (1998)
- 우 택주, "8세기 문서 예언을 형성시킨 결정적 요인들", 구약논단, 9, pp.137~166 (2000)
- 우 택주, "8세기 이스라엘과 유다의 집약농업 정책의 고고학적 증거들,구약과 신약의 세계: 박 준서 교수 헌정 논문집", pp.222~241 (2001), 한들출판사
- 정 중호, "열왕기하(대한기독교서회 창립 100주년 기념 성서주석 11)" (1995), 대한기독교서회
- 채 홍식, "언약법전과 8세기 예언자의 사회비판", 구약논단, 6, pp.91~123 (1999)
- Daube,D, "Studies in Biblical Law" (1969), Pilgrim
- Eising, H, "Art “?????,” ThWAT II (1977), 902-911쪽", ~ (1977)
- Fleischer, G, "Von Menschenverk?fern, Baschank?en und Rechtsverkehren. Die Sozialkritik des Amosbuches in historisch-kritischer, sozialgeschichtlicher und arch?logischer Perspecktive (BBB 73)" (1989), Peter Hanstein Verlag
- Gunneweg, A. H. J, "Geschichte Israel. Von den Anf?gen bis Bar Kochba und von Theodor Herzl bis zur Gegenwart (ThW 2)", W. Kohlhammer
- Kessler, R, "Staat und Gesellschaft im vorexilischen Juda, Habilitationsschrift" (1990), W.Kohlhammer
- Kippenberg, H. G, "Die Typik antiker Entwicklung,Seminar: Die Entstehung der antiken Klassengesellschaft (STW 130)", pp.173~204 (1977)
- Koch, K, "Die Entstehung der sozialen Kritik bei den Profeten,Probleme biblischer Theologie", pp.236~257 (1971), Kaiser Verlag
- Lang, B, "Prophetie und Okonomie im alten Israel, Vor Gott sind alle gleich, Soziale Gleichheit, soziale Ungleichheit und die Religionen", pp.53~73 (1983), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
- Lang, B, "Art “kipper,” TWAT IV (1984), 303-318쪽", ~ (1984)
- Leggett,D.A, "The Levirate and Goel Institutions in the Old Testament with special Attention to the Book of Ruth" (1974), Doubleday
- Mettinger,T, "Solomonic State Officials" (1971), Gleerup
- Pedersen,J, "Israel Its Life and Culture I" (1964), Clarendon
- de Vaux,R, "Histoire ancienne d'Israel des origines a l'installation en Canaan.I.?tudes bibliques" (1971), Gabalda
