본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

범인식별 과정에서의 정확성에 영향력을 미치는 개인차 및 상황변인 분석

Effect of Individual Differences and Situation on Identification Accuracy

김지영|김기범|허성호
한국공안행정학회 (Korean Association Of Public Safety And Criminal Justice)|2009.09|한국공안행정학회보 (korean Journal of Public Safety and Criminal Justice)|제18권 제3호|pp. 447-474

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

범인식별정확률IdentificationSituationAccuracy시스템 변인개인차 변인상황변인System VariablesIndividual Differences
주제분류행정학

초록

본 연구의 목적은 (범인)식별과정에서 절차에 관한 변인 및 식별과 관련된 개인차 변인이 식별의 정확성에 미치는 영향력을 검증하는 것이다. 본 연구에서는 개인차 변인으로 자의식, 사회적 불안과 피암시성을 측정하였고, 식별상황에 대한 스트레스를 측정하였으며, 식별과정과 관련된 시스템 변인으로는 식별 지시(편견, 비편견)와 라인업(동시적, 순차적)을 설정하였다. 분석 결과, 편향된 지시 조건에서 스트레스가 높게 나타났고, 피암시성이 높은 집단의 정확률이 낮게 나타났으며, 사회적 불안이 높은 사람들에게 편향된 지시를했을 때, 정확률이 현저히 떨어지는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 식별 후 확신감이 높은 집단이 정확률 또한 높은 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과를 토대로 심리학 분야에서의 기억과 목격자 증언에 대한 이론적, 실용적 시사점과 법 및 범죄 관련 분야로의 시사점을 논하였다.

Abstract

The goal of this study was to test effect of individual differences and system variables on identification accuracy. We measured self-consciousness, social anxiety, suggestibility, evaluation of stress under identification situation as individual differences and manipulated biased/unbiased instruction and simultaneous/sequential lineup presentations as system variables. The results showed that subjects experienced much stress under biased instruction. The more who were suggestible at instruction, the lower at identification accuracy. In addition, when the subjects who were high on social anxiety received biased instruction, they were low on identification accuracy. The results also indicated that the subjects who were confident after identification were more likely to be higher on identification accuracy.

참고문헌 (51)

  1. 연합뉴스, "성폭행 피해자 4명이 지목한 용의자 무죄", ~ (2005)
  2. 김시업, "한국 범죄심리학의 학문적 정립을 위한 주요 연구영역의 탐색", 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 11(2), pp.109~142 (2005), 한국사회문제심리학회
  3. 김지영, "복수면접(lineup)에서 순차적 제시와 동시적 제시방법의 식별 정확성 비교 분석", 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 21(2), pp.59~70 (2007), 한국사회및성격심리학회
  4. 김지혜, "자기 초점화 주의가 불안에 미치는 영향", 박사, pp.1991
  5. 이은진, "증인의 기억 왜곡에서의 무관련 정보효과", 한국심리학회지:사회문제, 5(1), pp.3~14 (1999)
  6. 조은경, "목격자와 피해자의 진술증거확보", 수사연구, 18~23 (2004)
  7. Bothwell, R. K, "Correlation of Eyewitness Accuracy and Confidence: Optimality Hypothesis Revisited", Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, pp.691~695 (1987)
  8. Cassel, W. S, "Developmental Patterns of Eyewitnessresponses to Increasingly Suggestive Questions", Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, pp.116~133 (1996)
  9. Ceci, S. J, "Children's Testimony: Applied and Basic Issues. In Handbook of child psychology: Child psychology in practice", pp.713~774 (1998), Wiley
  10. Christianson,S.A, "Emotional Stress and Eyewitness Memory: a Critical Review", Psychological Bulletin, 112, pp.284~309 (1992)
  11. Cutler, B. L, "Improving the Reliability of Eyewitness Identification: Lineup Construction and Presentation", Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, pp.281~290 (1988)
  12. Cutler, B. L, "Moderators of the Confidence-Accuracy Correlation in Face Recognition: The Role of Information Processing and base rates", Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3, pp.95~107 (1989)
  13. Davies, G. M, "Evidence: Psychological Perspectives. In Handbook of Psychology in Legal Contexts", pp.179~191 (1995), Wiley
  14. Deffenbacher,K.A, "Eyewitness Accuracy and Confidence: Can we Infer Anything about Their Relationship?", Law and Human Behavior, 4, pp.243~260 (1980)
  15. Deffenbacher, K. A, "Memory for Faces:Testing Method, Encoding Strategy, and Confidence", American Journal of Psychology, 94, pp.12~26 (1981)
  16. Fenigstein, A, "Public and Private Self-Consciousness:. Assessment and Theory", Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, pp.522~527 (1975)
  17. Fisher, R. P, "Memory-Enhancing Techniques for the Investigative Interviewing" (1992), Charles C. Thomas
  18. Forgas, J. P, "Mood Effects on Eyewitness Memory: Affective Influences on Susceptibility to Misinformation", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, pp.574~588 (2005)
  19. Gigerenzer, G, "Probabilistic Mental models: a Theory of Confidence", Psychological Review, 98, pp.506~528 (1991)
  20. Goodman, G. S, "Age Differences in Eyewitness Testimonies", Law and Human Behavior, 10, pp.317~332 (1986)
  21. Juslin, P, "Naive Empiricism and Dogmatism in Confidence Research: A Critical Examination of the Hard-Easy Effect", Psychological Review, 107, pp.384~96 (2000)
  22. Kassin, S. M, "The General Acceptanceof Psychological Research on Eyewitness Testimony: A survey of the experts", American Psychologist, 44, pp.1089~1098 (1989)
  23. Kassin, S, "On the ‘General Acceptance’ of Eyewitness Testimony Research: A new Survey of the Experts", American Psychologist, 56, pp.405~416 (2001)
  24. Lindsay,D.S, "Misleading Suggestions can Impair Eyewitnesses'Ability to Rememberevent Details", Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, pp.1077~1083 (1990)
  25. Lindsay, R. C. L, "Improving Eyewitness Identification from Lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentations", Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, pp.556~564 (1985)
  26. Lindsay, R. C. L, "Sequential Lineup Presentation: Technique Matters", Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, pp.741~745 (1991)
  27. Loftus,E.F, "Leading Questions and the Eyewitness Report", Cognitive Psychology, 7, pp.560~572 (1975)
  28. Loftus, E. F, "Reconstruction of Auto-Mobile Destruction: An Example of the Interaction between Language and Memory", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 13, pp.585~589 (1974)
  29. Loftus, E. F, "Semantic Integration of Verbal Information into a Visual Memory", Human Learning and Memory, 4, pp.19~31 (1978)
  30. Maass, A, "Eyewitness Identification: Simulating the weapon effect", Law and Human Behavior, 13, pp.397~408 (1989)
  31. Malpass, R. S, "Eyewitness Identification: Lineup Instructions and the Absence of the Offender", Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, pp.482~489 (1981)
  32. Olsson,N, "Acomparison of Correlation, Calibration, and Diagnosticity as Measures of the Confidence-Accuracy Relationship in Witness Identification", Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, pp.504~511 (2000)
  33. Poole, D. A, "Two years later: Effects of Question Repetition and Retention Interval on the Eyewitness Testimony of Children and Adults", Developmental Psychology, 27, pp.975~86 (1993)
  34. Roberts, K. P, "Effects of the Timing of Postevent Information on Preschoolers' Memories of an Event", Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, pp.541~559 (1999)
  35. Robinson, J, "Age Trends in Eye-witness Suggestibility and Compliance", Psychology, Crime, & Law, 3, pp.187~202 (1997)
  36. Robinson, M. D, "How net to Enhance the Confidence-Accuracy Relation: The Detrimental Effects of Attention to the Identification Process", Law and Human Behavior, 22, pp.409~428 (1998)
  37. Seelau, S. M, "Applied eyewitness research: the other mission", Law and Human Behavior, 19, pp.317~322 (1995)
  38. Smith, V. L, "Eyewitness Accuracy and Confidence: Within versus between subject Correlations", Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, pp.356~359 (1989)
  39. Sondhi, V, "The Role of Interviewer Behavior in Eyewitness Suggestibility", The Journal of Credibility Assessment and Witness Psychology, 6, pp.1~19 (2005)
  40. Steblay,N.M, "Social Influence in Eyewitness Recall: A Meta-Analytic Review of Lineup and Instruction Effects", Law and Human Behavior, 21(3), pp.283~297 (1997)
  41. Steblay, N, "Eyewitness Accuracy Rates in Sequential and Simultaneous Line-up Presentations:A Meta-Analytic Comparison", Law and Human Behavior, 25, pp.459~473 (2001)
  42. Steblay, N, "Eyewitness Accuracy Rates in Sequential and Simultanenous Lineup Presentations:A Meta-Analytic Comparison", Law and Human Behavior, 25(5), pp.459~473 (2001)
  43. Hazard evaluation and technical assistance report:The Dotson Company, "Stephenson,R.L", U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, ~, pp.NIOSH Report No. HETA 82-348-1442 (1984)
  44. Tuckey, M. R, "The Effect of Schemas, Stimulus Ambiguity, and Interview Schedule, on Eyewitness Memory over Time", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, pp.101~118 (2003)
  45. Warren, A. R, "Inducing Resistance to Suggestibility in Children", Law and Human Behavior, 15, pp.273~285 (1991)
  46. Weber, N, "The Effect of Judgment Type and Confidence Scale on Confidence-Accuracy Calibration in Face Recognition", Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, pp.490~499 (2003)
  47. Weber, N, "Confidence-Accuracy Calibration in Absolute and Relative Face Recognition Judgments", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, pp.156~172 (2004)
  48. Wells, G. L, "Methodological Notes on the Accuracy-Confidence. Relationship in Eyewitness Identifications", Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, pp.413~419 (1985)
  49. Wells, G. L, "Eyewitness confidence. In Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives", pp.155~170 (1984), Cambridge University Press
  50. Wells, G. L, "From the Lab to the Police Station", American Psychologist, 55(6), pp.581~598 (2000)
  51. Wells, G. L, "Eyewitness Identification Procedures:Recommendations for Lineups and Photospreads", Law and Human Behavior, 22, pp.603~647 (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

목격자의 범인식별 절차에서 식별 전 지시와 순차적 제시방식 유형에 따른 식별 정확성우소연, 조은경한국사회및성격심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격2012 · 제26권 제4호라인업 제시 방식과 동인종 편향이 목격자의 식별 정확도에 미치는 영향김윤혜, 이정원한국법심리학회 · 한국심리학회지:법2023 · 제14권 제3호복수면접(lineup)에서 순차적 제시와 동시적 제시방법의 식별 정확성 비교 분석김기범, 김시업, 김지영한국사회및성격심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격2007 · 제21권 제2호국내 범인식별절차의 현황과 시사점이정원한국형사정책학회 · 형사정책2021 · 제33권 제3호불안감 수준과 성별이 목격자 진술에 미치는 영향: 진술의 양과 정확성을 중심으로김시업, 홍유진아시아교정포럼 · 교정담론2017 · 제11권 제1호목격자 진술의 양과 확신이 범인식별 정확성에 미치는 영향신상화범죄수사연구원 · 범죄수사학연구2024 · 제10권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)

소년원생의 교정가능성에 대한 소년보호기관 종사자의 인식 연구김순석pp. 11-351940년대 한국 경호의 사적 고찰김은정pp. 37-57자살과 경찰의 대응방안에 관한 연구이대성, 김종오pp. 59-89남녀경찰관의 근무성과, 근무태도, 이직에 관한 영향요인 비교연구 : 구조방정식을 통한 남녀경찰관 비교연구박선영pp. 91-131성범죄자와 일반인의 강간통념 비교 연구송병호, 유재두pp. 133-165
원문 보기