본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

이스라엘 종교사로 본 화해 신학

Reconciliation Theology in the History of Religion in Israel

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기독교신학

초록

본 논문은 전승사적 비평방법을 통하여 창세기의 ‘화해 운동’이 이스라엘 종교사에서 어떠한 역할을 하고 있는지 그리고 어떻게 오경의 최종 형성에 영향을 주었는지에 대하여 연구한다. 이에 야곱-에서 이야기(창 33장)는 문제를 푸는 열쇠이다. 특히 사무엘서의 에돔 족속들의 활동과 오경의 에돔에 대한 역할의 시각 사이에서 큰 차이가 있다는 것은 매우 중요하다. 이러한 개념은 예언서에서의 ‘화해’ 운동과 긴밀히 연결되어 있다. 여기서 예레미야 27장과 49장 그리고 에스겔 32-36장까지 등장하는 에돔 역시 주전 7-6세기에 역사적으로 활동한 모습을 반영하고 있고 계속적으로 아모스와 오바댜 말라기에서 에돔은 이스라엘 편에서 볼 때 부정적인 관점으로 소개되고 있다. 이럼 점에서 ‘화해 신학’이라는 주제는 왕정시대의 개념이라기보다 시기적으로 페르시아 말기에 나타난 주제일 가능성이 높다. 그러므로 오경의 제사장적 개념의 최종 편집설은 이미 제기되는 수많은 비야웨계 문서들의 시기가 제사장적 문서의 시기보다 더 후대임이 증명되고 있으므로, 이 또한 본 논문은 새로운 오경의 형성 모습을 제시한다.

Abstract

This paper examines the role of 'reconciliation movement' in Genesis in the history of Israel religion through traditional criticism and how it influences final formation of the Pentateuch. The story in Jacob - Esau (Genesis 33) is the key to solving the problem. It is especially important that there is a great difference between the role of the Edomites in the Book Samuel and the Pentateuch. Here this concept is closely linked to the 'reconciliation' movement in the books of the prophets. Edom in Jeremiah 27 and 49 and, which appeared in chapters 32-36 of Ezekiel, also reflects the historical activities of the seventh and sixth centuries BCE. Amos and Obadiah continue to be introduced in Malachi and Edom as a negative perspective from Israel's side. In this point, the theme of 'reconciliation theology' is more likely to be the theme that appeared in the late Persian period than the concept of the monarchy age. Therefore, the final editing as priestly concept of the Pentateuch suggests that the time of many of the non-Jahwist documents already raised is later than the time of the priestly document, which also suggests the formation of a new Pentateuch.

참고문헌 (70)

  1. 김필회, "호세아 12장의 야곱전승", 구약논단, 16(3), pp.216~236 (2010), 한국구약학회[DOI]
  2. 민경구, "토라의 수용 및 재해석 – 신명기 23장 ‘총회법’을 중심으로", 구약논단, 23(2), pp.14~42 (2017), 한국구약학회[DOI]
  3. 에리히 쳉어, "구약성경개론" (2012), 분도출판사
  4. 조셉 블렌킨소프, "유대교의 기원: 에스라와 느헤미야를 중심으로" (2014), 대한기독교서회
  5. 조지프 블렌킨소프, "모세오경-성경의 첫 다섯 권 입문" (2006), 성서와 함께
  6. 장 루이 스카, "모세오경입문" (2016), 성바오로
  7. 최종원, "후기 유대 공동체의 '다문화‘(Multiculture)에 관한 연구 - 에스라와 느헤미야에 나타난 이방인에 대한 수용성과 배타성을 중심으로", 구약논단, 21(2), pp.122~154 (2015), 한국구약학회[DOI]
  8. Towner, W. S., "현대성서주석: 다니엘서" (2004), 한국장로교출판사
  9. Agyenta, A., "When reconciliation means more than the ‘remembering’ of former enemies: The Problem of the conclusion to the Jacob-Esau story from a narrative perspective (Gen 33,1-17)", Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses, 83, pp.123~134 (2007)
  10. Albertz, R., "Der Mensch als Hüter seiner Welt: Alttestamentliche Bibelarbeiten zu den Themen des Konziliaren Prozeses", pp.132~144 (1990), Calwer
  11. Amos, C., "The Genesis of reconciliation: The reconciliation of Genesis", Mission Studies, 23(1), pp.12~20 (2006)
  12. Anderson, B. A., "Edom in the book of Numbers", Zeitschrift für die alttetamentliche Wissenschaft, 124, pp.38~51 (2012)
  13. Bannett, C. -M., "Midian, Moab and Edom: The History and Archaeology of Late Bronze and Iron Age Jordan and Northwest Arabia", pp.9~17 (1983), JSOT Press
  14. Bartlett, J. R., "The Brotherhood of Edom", Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 2, pp.2~27 (1977)
  15. Bartlett, J. R., "The Kingdom of Edom", Irisch Biblical Studies, 10, pp.207~224 (1984)
  16. Berthoud, P., "The reconciliation of Joseph with his brothers. Gen 45,1-11(42,1-45,11) and 50,15-21", European Journal of Theology, 17(1), pp.5~11 (2008)
  17. Bienkowski, P., "Edom and Edomites", Palestine Exploration quarterly, 122, pp.139~142 (1992)
  18. Bienkowski, P., "The Land that I Will Show You: Essays on the History and Archaeology of the Ancient Near East in Honor of J. Maxwell Miller", pp.198~213 (2001), Sheffield Academic Press
  19. Blum, E., "Die Komposition der Vätergeschichte" (1984), Neukirchener Verlag
  20. Blum, E., "Congress Volume 43", pp.46~57 (1991)
  21. Carr, D. M., "The Formationof the Hebrew Bible: A New Reconstruction" (2011), Oxford University Press
  22. Coats, G. W., "Werden und Werken des Alten Testament, Festschrift C. Westermann", pp.82~106 (1980), Neukirchener
  23. Crüsemann, F., "Dominium, guilt and reconciliation: The contribution of the Jacob narrative in Genesis to political ethics", Semeia, 66, pp.67~77 (1994)
  24. Dicou, B., "Edom, Israel's Brother and Antagonist. The Role of Edom in Biblical Prophecy and Story" (1994), JSOT Press
  25. Doak, Brain R., "Ezekiel’s topography of the (un)-heroic dead in Ezekiel 32:17-32", Journal of the Biblical Literature, 132, pp.607~624 (2013)
  26. 1, "Geschichte des Volkes Israel und seiner Nachbarn in Grundzügen 1, ATD Ergänzungsreihe 4", pp.2000, Donner, H.
  27. 2, "Geschichte des Volkes Israel und seiner Nachbarn in Grundzügen 2, ATD Ergänzungsreihe 4", pp.2001, Donner, H.
  28. Donner, H. -Röllig, "Kanaanäische und Aramäische Inschriften Band. II", pp.320~324 (1964), Otto Harrassowitz
  29. Frei, P., "Reichsidee und Reichsorganisation im Perserreich" (1984), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
  30. Frei, P., "Die persische Reichsautorisation. Ein Überblick", Zeitschrift für altorientalische und biblische Rechtsgeschichte, 1, pp.1~35 (1995)
  31. Fuhs, F., "NEB-AT" (1984), Echter-Verlag
  32. Graupner, A., "Der Elohist. Gegenwart und Wirksamkeit des transzendenten Gottes in der Geschichte" (2002), Neukirchener Verlag
  33. Hentschel, G., "NEB-AT" (1994), Echter Verlag
  34. Hentschel, G., "NEB-AT" (1994), Echter Verlag
  35. Japhet, S., "The Formation of the Pentateuch", pp.543~560 (2016), Mohr Siebeck
  36. Kim, H. C. P., "Reading the Joseph story as a Diaspora narrative", Catholic Biblical Quarterly, 75, pp.219~238 (2013)
  37. Kraus, H. -J., "Biblischer Kommentar Altes Testament: Psalmen (I. II.)" (1978), Neukirchener Verlag
  38. Ku, Cha-Yong, "Weisheit in der Thronfolgegeschichte Davids. Eine literarkritische und literaturwissenschaftliche Untersuchung der Weisheitsdarstellung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung ihrer Ironisierung", pp.2009
  39. Levin, Ch., "Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments" (1993), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
  40. Long, B. O., "A Darkness between Brothers: Solomon and Adonijah", Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 19, pp.79~94 (1981)
  41. Muffs, Y., "Studies in the Aramaic Legal Papyri from Elephantine" (1969), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
  42. Nicholson, E. W., "Congress Volume 43", pp.10~21 (1991)
  43. Nissinin, M., "Prophetie, Redaktion und Fortschreibung im Hoseabuch: Studien zum Werdegang eines Prophetenbuches im Lichte von Hos 4 und 11" (1991), Butzon & Bercker
  44. Porten, B., "A History of Ancient Near Eastern Law, vol. 2", pp.863~881 (2003), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
  45. Porten, B., "Textbook of Aramaic Documents from Ancient Egypt (=TDA) A-D" (1986)
  46. de Pury, A., "Le cycle de Jacob comme légende autonome des origines d’Israël", Congress, 43, pp.78~96 (1991)
  47. de Pury, A., "A Farewell to the Yahwist?. The Composition of the Pentateuch in Recent European Interpretation", pp.51~72 (2006), SBL
  48. Von Rad, G., "Old Testament Library" (1981), SCM
  49. Rausche, B., "Purity and the Forming of Religious Traditions in the Ancient Mediterranean World and Ancient Judaism", pp.457~475 (2013), Brill
  50. Rüterswörden, U., "Die Persische Reichsautorisatin der Thora: fact or fiction?", Zeitschrift für altorientalische und biblische Rechtsgeschichte, 1, pp.47~61 (1995)
  51. Rüterswörden, U., "Das Buch Deuteronomium" (2005), Verlag Katholisches Bibelwerk
  52. Schmidt, W. H., "Congress Volume 43", pp.22~45 (1991), E. J. Brill
  53. Seebass, H., "Vätergeschichte II (23,1-36,43)" (1999), Neukirchener
  54. Seebass, H., "Edom und seine Umgehung Nach Numeri XX-XXI", Vetus Testamentum, 47, pp.255~262 (1997)
  55. Seidl, T., "Conflict and conflict resolution: Inner controversies and tensions as places of Israel’s self-conception in the patriarchal traditions of Genesis", Old Testament Essays, 26(3), pp.841~842 (2013)
  56. van Seters, J., "The Primeval Histories of Greece and Israel Compared", Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, 100, pp.1~22 (1988)
  57. van Seters, J., "Congress Volume 43", pp.58~77 (1991)
  58. van Seters, J., "The Pentateuch: A Social-Science Commentary" (1999), Sheffield Academic
  59. "Aspekte van versoening in die boek Genesis"[URL]
  60. Stoebe, H. J., "KAT" (1973), Gütersloher Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn
  61. Taggar-Cohen, A., "The covenant as contract: Joshua 24 and the Legal Aramaic Texts from Elephantine", Zeitschrift für die altorientalische und biblische Rechtsgeschichte, 11, pp.27~50 (2005)
  62. Thompson, T. L., "Memories of Esau and narrative reiteration. Themes of conflict and reconciliation", Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament, 25(2), pp.174~200 (2011)
  63. Thiel, W., "Die deuteronomistische Redaktion von Jermia 26-45" (1981), Neukirchener Verlag
  64. Waltke, B. K., "Genesis: A commentary" (2001), Zondervan
  65. Wenham, G. J., "WBC" (1994), Waco, TX
  66. Westermann, C., "Biblischer Kommentar: Genesis 12-36" (1981), Neukirchen Verlag
  67. Westermann, C., "Biblischer Kommentar: Genesis 37-50" (1982), Neukirchen Verlag
  68. Wiesehöfer, J., "’Reichsgesetz’ oder ‘Einzelfallgerechtigkeit’? Bemerkungen zu Peter Freis These von der achaimenidischen ‘Reichsautorisation’", Zeitschrift für altorientalische und biblische Rechtsgeschichte, 1, pp.36~46 (1995)
  69. Yaron, R., "Introductionto the Law of the Aramaic Papyri" (1961)
  70. Zimmerli, W., "Biblischer Kommentar Altes Testament: Ezechiel" (1979), Neukirchener Verlag

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)