북한문학의 지배 담론과 텍스트의 균열 양상 연구 - 해방에서 한국전쟁기까지(1945~1953)의 주요 작품을 중심으로 -

Abstract

This paper examines the dominant discourse and textual evidence for crack patterns in North Korean literature. Caps (1946) by Han seol-ya received positive reviews during presentation at the “Goodwill of North Korea and the Soviet Union”. But Criticism came from Soviet soldiers, who undermined the internal reality of the The text work by brandishing handguns. The Tiger Grandmother (1949) by Lee tae-joon illuminates the achievements of literacy projects in North Korean society that exaggerated figures of nature. In particular, it led to accusations of blasphemy and slander from the North Korean regime toward the working people. Honey(1951) by Kim nam-cheon included a monologue by a wounded soldier in the Korean War and was initially a new type(=as a new character), but it was critiqued as a work of humanitarian defeatism and sentimentalism. Literature is beyond discursive force and corresponds to multiformity by constantly advocating various interpretations in North Korean Literature. Therefore, it should not be accessible only the seed(=theme). The level of rhetoric, even in view of the relationship between the individual and society, is based on contemporary contradictions. This paper investigated works from various eras and antagonistic North Korean literature to find the cracks in the dominant discourse that reveal conflicting praise and criticism or selection and exclusion. This attention to this niche cracked the difficult narrative technology for integrated Korean literature to expand understanding of North Korean literature by comparing the literary differences between North and South Korea.