본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Reality of Military Base and the Evolution of Pacifism: Japan's Korean War and Peace

남기정
한국학중앙연구원 (The Academy of Korean Studies)|2014.12|The Review of Korean Studies|제17권 제2호|pp. 15-41|DOI 10.25024/review.2014.17.2.001

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

JapanpacifismThe Korean WarU.S. military basearticle 9
주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This article analyzes the reality of Japan as a as a military “base-state,” at the time of the Korean War as well as Japan’s reaction to the Korean war. It is well established fact that during the Korean War, Japan achieved independence and returned to the international society by signing the Peace Treaty of San Francisco. After Japan’s defeat in the World War II, Japan declared herself to be a “Peace-State,” but during the Korean War, Japan converted to a “base-state,” which was initially given as a basic framework to transition into a “base-state” to sustain Japan’s survival and future after the war. The Korean War gave Japan the appropriate timing for the serious reflection on the war and peace, in the vacuum of battle made in the reality of a war. In this situation, in Japan which was resembled a laboratory of “war and peace,” peace had experienced a typical diversification. First of all, the diversification of rise and fall occurred. On the one hand, fall to war reality occurred, on the other, rise to the vacuum of battle took place. Secondly, the diversification of entry and escape occurred. In the reality of the Korean War, some tried to guarantee peace by entering any one of camps, others tries to realize peace by escaping from all of camps. With the Korean War intersecting the abovementioned rise and fall, entry and escape pacifism in Japan was diversified into four categories: “constitutional pacifism,” “absolute pacifism,” “camp pacifism,” and “armament pacifism.”Postwar pacifism in Japan had been developed as diversification or combination of above mentioned four kinds of pacifism. “Pacifism in everyday life” is the most distinctive type of all them. It is composed of “constitutional pacifism” and “absolute pacifism,” and deploys as a superposition of the two types of pacifisms. Naturally, the two pacifisms have been inseparable, and they have been unable to exist without the other. While the constitutional pacifism tried to descend, it ascended as a canon of Japanese pacifism, and absolute pacifism tried to ascend but descended and rooted deeply in the mind of the Japanese people.

Abstract

This article analyzes the reality of Japan as a as a military “base-state,” at the time of the Korean War as well as Japan’s reaction to the Korean war. It is well established fact that during the Korean War, Japan achieved independence and returned to the international society by signing the Peace Treaty of San Francisco. After Japan’s defeat in the World War II, Japan declared herself to be a “Peace-State,” but during the Korean War, Japan converted to a “base-state,” which was initially given as a basic framework to transition into a “base-state” to sustain Japan’s survival and future after the war. The Korean War gave Japan the appropriate timing for the serious reflection on the war and peace, in the vacuum of battle made in the reality of a war. In this situation, in Japan which was resembled a laboratory of “war and peace,” peace had experienced a typical diversification. First of all, the diversification of rise and fall occurred. On the one hand, fall to war reality occurred, on the other, rise to the vacuum of battle took place. Secondly, the diversification of entry and escape occurred. In the reality of the Korean War, some tried to guarantee peace by entering any one of camps, others tries to realize peace by escaping from all of camps. With the Korean War intersecting the abovementioned rise and fall, entry and escape pacifism in Japan was diversified into four categories: “constitutional pacifism,” “absolute pacifism,” “camp pacifism,” and “armament pacifism.”Postwar pacifism in Japan had been developed as diversification or combination of above mentioned four kinds of pacifism. “Pacifism in everyday life” is the most distinctive type of all them. It is composed of “constitutional pacifism” and “absolute pacifism,” and deploys as a superposition of the two types of pacifisms. Naturally, the two pacifisms have been inseparable, and they have been unable to exist without the other. While the constitutional pacifism tried to descend, it ascended as a canon of Japanese pacifism, and absolute pacifism tried to ascend but descended and rooted deeply in the mind of the Japanese people.

참고문헌 (60)

  1. Aeba, Takanori, "Chosen-senso: Bundan 38-dosen-no Shinjitsu-wo Ou" (1991), NHK Shuppankai
  2. Akagi, Kanji, "The Korean War and Japan", Seoul Journal of Korean Studies, 24(1), pp.175~184 (2011)
  3. Ara, Takashi, "Saigunbi to Zainichi-beigun", Nihon-tsushi, 20, pp.147~182 (1995)
  4. Ara, Takash, "Chosen-senso Zengo-no Zainichi-kyokuto-beigun", Nenpo-Nihongendai-shi, 4, pp.1~42 (1998)
  5. Arahata, Kanson, "Kanson Jiden II" (1999), Iwanami-bunko
  6. "Asahi Shimbun. November 15, 1950", ~ (1950)
  7. "Asahi Shimbun. September 20, 1951", ~ (1951)
  8. "Asahi Shimbun. (evening). September 12, 1952", ~ (1952)
  9. Ashida, Hitoshi., "Ashida Hitoshi Nikki. Vol. 3" (1986), Iwanami-shoten
  10. Dower, John, "Yoshida Shigeru-to Sono Jidai II" (1981), TBS Britanca
  11. Drifte, Reinhard, "Japan’s Involvement in the Korean War", pp.120~134 (1989), Manchester University Press
  12. "Gakushuin Daigaku Shimbun. September 24, 1953", ~ (1953)
  13. Hatoyama, Ichiro., "Daigishi-no Seikatsu-to Iken" (1952), Tokyo-shuppan
  14. Homu-fu Tokukshin-kyoku, "Tokushin Geppo", ~ (1951)
  15. Ishibashi, Tanzan, "Ishibashi Tanzan Zenshu. Vol. 14" (1970), Toyo-keizaishinpo-sha
  16. Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, "The Korean Conflict and Our Position", pp.346~350 (1991), San’ichi-shobo
  17. Katzenstein, Peter J., "Cultural Norms and National Security: Police and Military in Postwar Japan" (1996), Cornell University Press
  18. Kawamura, Minato, "Collection Senso-to Bungaku 1", pp.649~661 (2012), Shueisha
  19. Keibi-keisatsu-kenkyukai, "Uyoku Undo" (1955), Tachibana-shobo
  20. Kim, Hang, "Haejeok, Shimin, Kurigo Noye-ui Jagi-inshik", SAI, 10, pp.63~94 (2011)
  21. Kinoshita, Hanji, "Nihon-no Uyoku" (1953), Kaname-shobo
  22. Kobayashi, Tomoko., "Sengo-niokeru Zainichi Chosenjin-to Sokoku:Chosen-senso-ki-wo Chushin-ni", Chosen-shi-kenkyu-kai Ronbunshu, 34, pp.15~50 (1996)
  23. Kobori, Jinji., "Saibunbi-mondai-no Ketsuron", Jiyu-no Hata-no Motoni, ~ (1953)
  24. Koyama, Hirotake, "Nihon Gunji-kogyo-no Shiteki-bunseki" (1972), Ochanomizu-shobo
  25. Mainichi Shimbun, "Mainichi Shimbun. September 3, 1950", ~ (1950)
  26. "Mainichi Shimbun. March 3, 1951", ~ (1951)
  27. "Mainichi Shimbun. September 16, 1951", ~ (1951)
  28. "Mainichi Shimbun. July 10, 1952", ~ (1952)
  29. "Mainichi Shimbun. October 4, 1952", ~ (1952)
  30. Maruyama, Masao, "Gendai Nihon-no Shiso-to Kodo" (1976), Mirai-sha
  31. Midford, Paul., "Rethinking Japanese Public Opinion and Security: From Pacifism to Realism?" (2011), Stanford University Press
  32. Morito, Tatsuo, "Heiwa-Kokka no Kensetsu", Kaizo, 27 (1946)
  33. Nam, Kijeong, "Hanguk-jeonjaeng-gwa Ilbon: Kiji-gukka-eui Jeonjaenggwa Pyeonghwa", Peace Studies, 9, pp.167~188 (2000)
  34. Nam, Kijeong., "Ilbon-ui Jaegunbi-wa Kiji-gukka-ron", pp.771~828 (2001), Kunsa-pyeonchan-yeonguso
  35. 남기정, "한국전쟁 시기 특별수요의 발생과 ‘생산기지’ 일본의 탄생: 특별수요의 군사적 성격에 주목하여", 한일군사문화연구, 13, pp.253~278 (2012), 한일군사문화학회[DOI]
  36. Nam, Kijeong, "Yoshida Shigeru-eui Jeonhu-gusang-gwa Leadership", pp.29~62 (2013), EAI
  37. 남기정, "일본의 전후 평화주의―원류와 전개, 그리고 현재", 역사비평, (106), pp.94~134 (2014), 역사문제연구소
  38. Nam, Kijeong, "Ilbon-ui Saenghwal-pyeonghwa-jueui" (2014), Bakmunsa
  39. Otake, Hideo, "Sengo Nihon Boei-mondai Shiryo-shu I" (1991), Sanichishobo
  40. 박명림, "동북아 평화질서와 한일의 한국전쟁 기억 : 일본의 한국전쟁 인식을 중심으로", 인문과학, 86, pp.43~57 (2004), 인문학연구원
  41. Rho, Byeong-ho, "Jeonhu Ilbon-ui Naesyeonollijeum-gwa Miguk" (2014), Shinseowon
  42. Saki, Ryuzo, "Kiseki-no Machi", pp.585~644 (2012), Shueisha
  43. Shinobu, Seizaburo, "Sengo Nihon Seiji-shi. Vol. 4" (1967), Keiso-shobo
  44. Suzuki, Hidetake, "Chosen Kaiiki-ni Shutsugeki-shita Nihon Tokubetsusokaitai", Senshi-kenkyu-nenpou, 8, pp.26~46 (2005)
  45. Suzuki, Sankichi, "Saibunbi-ni notta Uyoku-no Naimaku", Zitsugyo-no Nippon, 56(6), pp.28~31 (1953)
  46. Tsuboi, Toyokichi., "Zainichi Chosenjin-undo-no Gaikyo (Homu Kenkyu Hokokusho)", 46(3), pp.3~ (1959)
  47. Tsuzuki, Tsutomu, "Sengo Nihon-no Chishikijin: Maruyama Masao-to Sono Jidai" (1995), Seori-shobo
  48. Wada, Haruki., "Chosen-senso Zenshi" (2002), Iwanami-shoten
  49. Wada, Haruki., "Sengo-heiwashugi-no Kigen", Shiso, 944, pp.5~26 (2002)
  50. Wada, Haruki, "The Korean War: An International History" (2014), Rowman &Littlefield
  51. Watanabe, Tetsuzo., "Saigunbironsha to Uyoku", Keisatsu Jiho, 8(10), pp.28~29 (1952)
  52. Yamamoto, Tshuyoshi, "Chosen-tokuju" (1985), Kodan-sha
  53. Yamazaki, Shizuo., "Shijitsu-de Kataru Chosen-senso Kyoryoku-no Zenyo" (1998), Hon-no-izumi-sha
  54. Yi, Young-chae, "Hangun-jeonjaeng-i Jeonhu Ilbon-sahoi-e Michin Younghyang", Asia Journal, 7, pp.58~94 (2013)
  55. 임경화, "원폭 투하를 막아라 ― 한국전쟁기 북일 평화운동의 전개와 의미", 일본역사연구, (39), pp.129~152 (2014), 일본사학회
  56. 유지아, "韓國戰爭 前後, 對日講和條約 論議에 의한 아시아 내에서 日本의 安保와 位相 －韓國과의 關係를 中心으로－", 韓日民族問題硏究, 18(18), pp.69~105 (2010), 한일민족문제학회
  57. "Yomiuri Shimbun. August 15, 1950", ~ (1950)
  58. "Yomiuri Shimbun. January 3, 1951", ~ (1951)
  59. "Yomiuri Shimbun. October 8, 1951", ~ (1951)
  60. Yoshida, Shigeru, "Yoshida Shigeru Shokan" (1994), Chuokoronsha

관련 논문AI추천

전후 일본의 역사교육정책과 反평화주의구경남동북아시아문화학회 · 동북아 문화연구2016 · 제1권 제48호Pacifism or Peace Movement?: Hiroshima Memory Debates and Political CompromisesMikyoung Kim국제학연구소 · Journal of International and Area Studies2008 · 제15권 제1호냉전 이데올로기의 구조화와 내셔널 아이덴티티의 형성의 상관관계: 한일비교남기정규장각한국학연구원 · 한국문화2008 · 제41호6.25전쟁과 한⋅미⋅일 공조의 형성에 관한 연구이종판국방부군사편찬연구소 · 군사2010 · 제74호Perspectives on the Korean War in Japanese High School Textbooks: Research Trends of Japanese Academia and their Reflection in the Textbooks박소영한국학중앙연구원 · The Review of Korean Studies2009 · 제12권 제1호1948～50년 사회주의진영의 평화론과 평화운동의 동아시아적 수용과 변용: 국가별 사례 비교김태우동북아시아문화학회 · 동북아 문화연구2019 · 제1권 제58호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)

The Korean War and Koreans in Japan: An Actor Analysis김태기pp. 43-96Tracing Memories of Tauchi Chizuko: Korean Memories of Historical Shame and the "Japanese Mother of Korean War Orphans"김미경pp. 97-124The Humanities Studies Movement in South Korea: A Different Perspective on the "Crisis in the Humanities" and a Caution to Imagining Anti-Capitalist Community송제숙pp. 127-143How Authoritarian Regimes Maintain Domain Consensus: North Korea's Information Strategies in the Kim Jong-un EraSteven Denney, Christopher Green, Adam Cathcartpp. 145-178The Effects of War and the Strategies for Salvation in Postwar Korean Society in Jang Yonghak's The Poetry of JohnCatalina Stanciupp. 179-211
원문 보기