본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

6.25전쟁과 한⋅미⋅일 공조의 형성에 관한 연구

A Study on the Korean War and Foundation of theROK-US-Japan Cooperation

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

This study considered the progress in which the US and Soviet those were the Allied Nations went into the hostile relation, the US and Japan those were the hostile country went into the allied relations, Japan and the Republic of Korea(ROK) those were exclusive each other formed the cooperation system mediated by the US through post-war settlement process of the Pacific War, progress of the cold war and the Korean War. In sum, This results are as the followings. First, after the Pacific War, the US wanted Japan to be joined in order to prepare for the war against the Soviet as the cold war had been gradually aggravated in the post-war settlement process. On the other hand, the ROK was a symbol of the political prestige but strategically less important to the US. This was a dilemma of the US. The US intended to resolve this problem by transferring this from the US-Soviet Committee to the UN. Second, in September 1951, the peace treaty which means the legal conclusion of the Pacific War was made with focusing on the US and excluding the Soviet. In the same day, the US intended to exploit this for defending the free world by remilitarizing Japan through the US-Japan Security Treaty. Meanwhile, in October 1, 1953, it is for obtaining the agreement and cooperation of Syngman Rhee with regard to the cease-fire that the Eisenhower Administration made a mutual defence treaty with the ROK. Japan, however, declined the remilitarization by insisting the nation's and economy condition. Then, the US accepted the division of Korea as a reality and recognize Korea as a new contributor to the Pacific Security. The base of the today's Korea-US-Japan cooperation is the ROK-US Security Treaty and the US-Japan Security Treaty. To the US, for the security of the Pacific obtained through the war against Japan, Korea and Japan are recognized as the first and second defence line, respectively. To Japan, the existence of the ROK is considered the defence wall of the anti-communism, and rear-supporting such as providing the US strategy with bases and facilities in return for the security free-riding by the US Forces. To the ROK, for responding to the invasion from the communism, it can be blocked by the ROK-US alliance and supported from the rear side by the US-Japan alliance. Moreover, the US-Japan Security Treaty plays a role as a bottle cap restraining the enhancement of Japanese military power because the US is mainly in charge of the Japanese defense, so that the security of the ROK feared by Japanese armed threat is guaranteed. In other words, in the US-Japan Security Treaty it is stipulated that they contributes to the world peace and security keeping in the Far East, and the ROK-US security treaty said that they respond cooperatively to the armed attack from outside in the Pacific area. Thus, the application range of the ROK-US Security Treaty is more wider than that of the US-Japan Security Treaty. This is the US' intention of tying Japan in the Far East by controling the Japanese advance to the Pacific.

Abstract

This study considered the progress in which the US and Soviet those were the Allied Nations went into the hostile relation, the US and Japan those were the hostile country went into the allied relations, Japan and the Republic of Korea(ROK) those were exclusive each other formed the cooperation system mediated by the US through post-war settlement process of the Pacific War, progress of the cold war and the Korean War. In sum, This results are as the followings. First, after the Pacific War, the US wanted Japan to be joined in order to prepare for the war against the Soviet as the cold war had been gradually aggravated in the post-war settlement process. On the other hand, the ROK was a symbol of the political prestige but strategically less important to the US. This was a dilemma of the US. The US intended to resolve this problem by transferring this from the US-Soviet Committee to the UN. Second, in September 1951, the peace treaty which means the legal conclusion of the Pacific War was made with focusing on the US and excluding the Soviet. In the same day, the US intended to exploit this for defending the free world by remilitarizing Japan through the US-Japan Security Treaty. Meanwhile, in October 1, 1953, it is for obtaining the agreement and cooperation of Syngman Rhee with regard to the cease-fire that the Eisenhower Administration made a mutual defence treaty with the ROK. Japan, however, declined the remilitarization by insisting the nation's and economy condition. Then, the US accepted the division of Korea as a reality and recognize Korea as a new contributor to the Pacific Security. The base of the today's Korea-US-Japan cooperation is the ROK-US Security Treaty and the US-Japan Security Treaty. To the US, for the security of the Pacific obtained through the war against Japan, Korea and Japan are recognized as the first and second defence line, respectively. To Japan, the existence of the ROK is considered the defence wall of the anti-communism, and rear-supporting such as providing the US strategy with bases and facilities in return for the security free-riding by the US Forces. To the ROK, for responding to the invasion from the communism, it can be blocked by the ROK-US alliance and supported from the rear side by the US-Japan alliance. Moreover, the US-Japan Security Treaty plays a role as a bottle cap restraining the enhancement of Japanese military power because the US is mainly in charge of the Japanese defense, so that the security of the ROK feared by Japanese armed threat is guaranteed. In other words, in the US-Japan Security Treaty it is stipulated that they contributes to the world peace and security keeping in the Far East, and the ROK-US security treaty said that they respond cooperatively to the armed attack from outside in the Pacific area. Thus, the application range of the ROK-US Security Treaty is more wider than that of the US-Japan Security Treaty. This is the US' intention of tying Japan in the Far East by controling the Japanese advance to the Pacific.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 이종판, "일본의 6⋅25전쟁 연구" (2009), 국방부 군사편찬연구소
  2. 古坦鐵郞, "軍人のなかの外交官", pp.441~442 (1965), 鹿島硏究所出版會
  3. 朝鮮戰爭が日本に及ぼした影響等ついて, "江口正夫", 防衛硏究所, 27~, pp.防衛硏究所硏究資料98-RO-1H
  4. 공보처, "대통령 이승만 담화집", pp.142~143 (1953), 공보처
  5. 대한민국 국방부, "韓國戰亂 1年誌, 1950년 5월 1일-1951년 6월 30일", pp.86~, 대한민국 국방부 정훈국 전사편찬회
  6. 吉田茂, "世界と日本" (1963), 番町書房
  7. 三木秀雄, "支援といぅ名の防衛戰略", 防衛大學校紀要, (52), pp.54~ (1985), 防衛大學校
  8. U.S. Department of Defense, "United States-Vietnam Relations 1945-1967", pp.256~257 (1971), U.S. Government Printing Office
  9. Ill Importance of Korea to the U.S. in: Record of the U.S. Department of State relations to the internal affairs of Korea, 1945-1949, , U.S. Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States, ~, pp.Department of State decimal file 895. 01 (1947), 2-2547
  10. 三木秀雄, "韓國の放棄と日本の防衛-朝鮮戦争開始前における米国の極東戦略に関する史的考察", 防衛大学校紀要, (52), pp.97~118 (1986)
  11. 신복룡, "한국분단사연구 1943-1953", pp.580~584 (2001), 한울아카데미
  12. 남주홍, "제2차태평양전쟁", pp.44~45 (1991), 동아출판사
  13. 박관숙, "트루먼회고록" (1971), 한림출판사
  14. 玉井勇夫, "日本の分割", pp.70~72 (1978), 學硏
  15. 毛澤東, "論人民民主專政(1949年 6月 30日). in: 毛澤東選集⋅第4卷", pp.1473~ (1971), 人民出版社
  16. Committee on Foreign Relations, "Senate, Reviews of the World Situation 1949- 1950. Historical Series, v. 8", pp.191~ (1979), Garland Publishing, Inc.
  17. 三木秀雄, "朝鮮戰爭史: 統聯合作戰", pp.10~ (2005), 統合幕僚學校
  18. 戰略戰術用語集, "육군본부", 434~, pp.敎育參考101-20-5 (1984)
  19. 五十嵐武士, "對日講和と冷戰 戰後日米關係の形成" (1988), 東京大學出版會
  20. 室山義正, "日米安保体制, 上" (1992), 有斐問
  21. 외교안보연구원, "한국외교의 20년", pp.55~57 (1967), 외무부
  22. U.S. Department of State Historical Office, "American Foreign Policy 1950-1955 Basic Documents, v. II" (1974), Kraus Reprint Co.
  23. 李鍾元, "東アジア冷戰と韓米日關係" (1996), 東京大學出版會

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)