About the Tradition of Writing the “Fu on the Terrace for Viewing Fish” in the Early Joseon Period
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines how Joseon literati understood wen 文 and how different perspectives on the wen were reflected in their literary writings especially in fu 賦 works. In Korea, from the fifteenth century onward, the elite class was divided into two groups: the Hungu 勳舊 faction and the Sarim 士林 faction. The former focused on literary craft while the latter focused on incorporating Confucian thoughts in their literary works. I argue that factional differences in terms of understanding the wen reflected the different social statuses of Joseon intellectuals. Scholars from the Hungu faction and capital-based candidates became highly confident in their literary skills. In contrast, Sarim scholars and provincial scholars strategically chose neo-Confucianism as the central ideology of their literary works. To prove this, I compare the three “Gwaneodae bu” 觀魚臺賦 written by Korean fu writers of late Goryeo to early Joseon. The focus is on their adoption of the features of dafu 大賦, or grand fu forms. I analyze how their different views of literature influenced them in writing their fu works in different styles.
Abstract
This paper examines how Joseon literati understood wen 文 and how different perspectives on the wen were reflected in their literary writings especially in fu 賦 works. In Korea, from the fifteenth century onward, the elite class was divided into two groups: the Hungu 勳舊 faction and the Sarim 士林 faction. The former focused on literary craft while the latter focused on incorporating Confucian thoughts in their literary works. I argue that factional differences in terms of understanding the wen reflected the different social statuses of Joseon intellectuals. Scholars from the Hungu faction and capital-based candidates became highly confident in their literary skills. In contrast, Sarim scholars and provincial scholars strategically chose neo-Confucianism as the central ideology of their literary works. To prove this, I compare the three “Gwaneodae bu” 觀魚臺賦 written by Korean fu writers of late Goryeo to early Joseon. The focus is on their adoption of the features of dafu 大賦, or grand fu forms. I analyze how their different views of literature influenced them in writing their fu works in different styles.
참고문헌 (20)
- Bak, Seon-jeong, "佔畢齋 金宗直 文學硏究" (1988), Iu chulpansa
- 陳鼓應, "莊子今注今譯" (1983), Zhonghua shuju
- 김진경, "한국 사부의 사적 전개에 관한 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2005
- 金宗直, "(國譯)佔畢齋集" (1996), Minjok munhwa chujinhoe
- 金宗直, "東文粹" (1996), Minchang munhwasa
- 金星洙, "한국賦의 연구", 박사, 한문학, pp.1994
- Gim, Seong-su, "韓國 辭賦의 理解" (1996), Gukhak jaryowon
- Gim, Seong-su, "辭賦文學硏究" (2007), Kongju National University Press
- 龔克昌, "漢賦硏究" (1990), Shandong wenyi chubanshe
- Jeong, Wook-Jin, "The Influence of the Wen xuan on the Sino-Korean Literature of Early Chosŏn", PhD, pp.2019
- Jo, Dong-il, "韓國文學通史" (2005), Jisik saneopsa
- Knechtges, David R., "Introduction to Studies on the Han Fu", pp.1~51 (1997), American Oriental Society
- Owen, Stephen, "vol. 1 of the Cambridge History of Chinese Literature", pp.286~380 (2010), Cambridge University Press
- 徐居正, "(國譯)四佳集" (2009), Hanguk gojeon beonyeogwon
- 徐居正, "東人詩話" (1980), Gyeongmunsa
- 徐居正, "東文選" (1914), Joseon goseo ganhaenghoe
- 成俔, "虛白堂集" (1988), Hanguk gojeon beonyeogwon
- Yi, Jong-muk, "徐居正 文學의 綜合的 檢討" (1996), Hanguk jeongsin munhwa yeonguwon
- Yi, Won-ju, "佔畢齋 硏究", Hangukhak nonjip, 6, pp.1~51 (1979)
- 詹杭倫, "唐宋賦学研究" (2004), Shehui kexueyuan chubanshe