본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Tang-Song Poetry Debate in Joseon

한희연
한국학중앙연구원 (The Academy of Korean Studies)|2021.06|The Review of Korean Studies|제24권 제1호|pp. 215-238|DOI 10.25024/review.2021.24.1.007

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

King JeongjoindigenizationTang-Song poetry debateJoseon poetryMing-Qing poetryliterary reform
주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This paper examines the development and implications of the Tang-Song poetry debate in Joseon. The debate, which started in China during the late Song period, was introduced to early Joseon through the Ming dynasty. While embracing the Chinese literati’s evaluations of Tang and Song poetic traditions and their reverence for Tang poetry as a paragon of poetic excellence, the Joseon literati also formed critical views on the debate, informed by their unique cultural and political realities. This paper identifies three key factors that led to the distinct development of the debate in Joseon: namely, 1) the influence of orthodox Neo-Confucian ideology, 2) the growing awareness of Joseon’s temporal and cultural distance from China, and 3) King Jeongjo’s literary reform. While Song poetry was rejected as an inferior model by the Ming participants in the debate, the Joseon literati came to its defence due to their commitment to the Song Neo-Confucians and their literary works. Citing Joseon’s distinct history and culture from those of the Chinese dynasties, they also formed critical responses to the trend of imitating Tang poetry. More importantly, the debate in Joseon entailed the renunciation of Ming-Qing poetry and the promotion of Joseon poetry, best exemplified in King Jeongjo’s literary reform. Taken as a whole, the Tang-Song poetry debate served as a catalyst for dynamic theoretical explorations and indigenization of Sinitic poetry in Joseon, Korea.

Abstract

This paper examines the development and implications of the Tang-Song poetry debate in Joseon. The debate, which started in China during the late Song period, was introduced to early Joseon through the Ming dynasty. While embracing the Chinese literati’s evaluations of Tang and Song poetic traditions and their reverence for Tang poetry as a paragon of poetic excellence, the Joseon literati also formed critical views on the debate, informed by their unique cultural and political realities. This paper identifies three key factors that led to the distinct development of the debate in Joseon: namely, 1) the influence of orthodox Neo-Confucian ideology, 2) the growing awareness of Joseon’s temporal and cultural distance from China, and 3) King Jeongjo’s literary reform. While Song poetry was rejected as an inferior model by the Ming participants in the debate, the Joseon literati came to its defence due to their commitment to the Song Neo-Confucians and their literary works. Citing Joseon’s distinct history and culture from those of the Chinese dynasties, they also formed critical responses to the trend of imitating Tang poetry. More importantly, the debate in Joseon entailed the renunciation of Ming-Qing poetry and the promotion of Joseon poetry, best exemplified in King Jeongjo’s literary reform. Taken as a whole, the Tang-Song poetry debate served as a catalyst for dynamic theoretical explorations and indigenization of Sinitic poetry in Joseon, Korea.

참고문헌 (64)

  1. Alston, Dane, "Emperor and Emissary: The Hongwu Emperor, Kwŏn Kŭn, and the Poetry of Late Fourteenth-century Diplomacy", Korean Studies, 32, pp.104~147 (2008)
  2. 박향란, "<八子百選策>을 통해 본 박제가의 작품선정 기준과 당송문학을 보는 시각", 한국문학논총, (80), pp.137~159 (2018), 한국문학회[DOI]
  3. Bak, Hye-jin, "Jeongjo dae munche banjeong ui jihyang gwa uiui:Ildeungnok e natanan Jeongjo ui munjanggwan eul jungsim euro", Gyeorye eomunhak, 37, pp.139~170 (2006)
  4. "Jeongyugak-jip"[URL]
  5. "Namgye-jip"[URL]
  6. 박수천, "『小華詩評』의 批評樣相", 한국한시연구, (17), pp.121~149 (2009), 한국한시학회
  7. 박순철, "韓國詩話에 나타난 尊唐派․尊宋派의 評論硏究 - 李白, 杜甫, 蘇軾, 黃庭堅 評論을 中心으로 -", 중국인문과학, (52), pp.173~197 (2012), 중국인문학회
  8. 부유섭, "신흠과 명대 문학—명대 복고시학과 저술을 중심으로", 민족문화연구, (65), pp.123~151 (2014), 민족문화연구원[DOI]
  9. 최석원, "문학적 전범으로서 ‘唐詩’에 대한 지식의 유통과 확산 — 朝鮮의 唐詩選集 간행과 수용의 역사를 중심으로", 중국어문논총, (93), pp.183~204 (2019), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
  10. de Bary, Wm. Theodore, "Sources of Chinese Tradition: From 1600 Through the Twentieth Century" (2000), Columbia University Press
  11. Gang, Hye-seon, "Jeongjo ui simunjip pyeonchan" (2000), nheon gwa haeseoksa
  12. 계승범, "조선 속의 명나라 ― 大報壇을 통해서 본 조선 지배층의 중화 인식 ―", 명청사연구, (35), pp.153~185 (2011), 명청사학회[DOI]
  13. Han, Christina, "Between Poetry and Philosophy: The Neo-Confucian Hermeneutics of Zhu Xi’s Nine Bends Poem", Asian Philosophy, 23(1), pp.62~85 (2013)
  14. 한윤숙, "楚亭 朴齊家 예술의 朝鮮風에 관한 연구", 동양철학연구, (93), pp.83~108 (2018), 동양철학연구회[DOI]
  15. "Seongso bubugo"[URL]
  16. "Bangsan-jip" (1910)[URL]
  17. "Yeoncheon-jip"[URL]
  18. "Igye-jip" (1843)[URL]
  19. "Ganghan-jip"[URL]
  20. "Ilseongnok"[URL]
  21. "Hongjae jeonseo" (1814)[URL]
  22. "Jeongjo sillok"[URL]
  23. Jo, Jeong-eop, "Zhong Han Ri shihua bijiao yanjiu" (1984), Xuehai chubanshe
  24. Ju, Seung-taek, "Joseon malyeop Dang-si pung gwa Song-si pung ui galdeung yangsang", Hanguk sihak yeongu, 1, pp.321~345 (1998)
  25. "Nongam-jip"[URL]
  26. 김동준, "정치권력과의 상관관계로 본 金昌協･金昌翕의 문학비평과 그 성격 -18세기로의 전환기 한국한문학의 특성에 초점을 맞춰-", 한국한문학연구, (67), pp.139~177 (2017), 한국한문학회[DOI]
  27. Kim, Gyeong-mi, "Bak Je-ga ui munhak insik gwa siron ui yangsang", Urimunhak yeongu, 8, pp.60~79 (1990)
  28. "Haeseok yugo"[URL]
  29. "Wandang jeonjip" (1986)[URL]
  30. 김종서, "詩話에 나타난 三唐詩人에 대한 批評 樣相", 漢文學報, 17(1), pp.309~358 (2007), 우리한문학회
  31. "Seopo-jip"[URL]
  32. "Seokdang yugo" (1804)[URL]
  33. 김태희, "정조(正祖)의 문체정책의 양면성: 학문적 성격과 정치적 성격", 한국동양정치사상사연구, 11(1), pp.77~98 (2012), 한국동양정치사상사학회
  34. 나종면, "正祖의 文學思想에 대하여", 동양문화연구, 3, pp.51~70 (2009), 동양문화연구원[DOI]
  35. No, Gyeong-hui, "17-8 segi Joseon gwa Edo mundan ui Dang-si seonjip suyong gwa ganhaeng yangsang bigyo yeongu", Dasan gwa hyeondae, 3, pp.135~169 (2012)
  36. No, Gyeong-hui, "17-segi jeonbangi Han-Jung munhwa gyoryu" (2015), Taehaksa
  37. Qiu, Meiqiong, "Ming dai shixue piping zhong de Tang Song zhi lun", Jiangxi jiaoyu xueyuan xuebao, 21(2), pp.11~14 (2000)
  38. "Sejong Sillok"[URL]
  39. "Dongmunseon"[URL]
  40. "Saga-jip"[URL]
  41. Sim, Gyeong-ho, "Joseon hugi minjok uisik gwa Hansi", Hanguk hanmunhak yeongu, 15, pp.125~150 (1992)
  42. "Yeoam yugo" (1910)[URL]
  43. "Sangchon-go"[URL]
  44. "Cheongcheon-jip"[URL]
  45. Wang, Yingzhi, "Qing dai Tang Song shi zhi zheng liu bian shi" (2012), Renmin wenxue chubanshe
  46. Xu, Anqi, "Hanguo shihua zhong de Song shi lun", Jungguk inmun hakhoe haksul daehoe balpyo nonmunjip, pp.67~84 (2007)
  47. "Jeho-jip"[URL]
  48. Yang, Huimin, "Lun Chaoxian chao chong Tang shi ren qun Han shi chuangzuo ji yingxiang", Chongqing ligong daxue xuebao, 16(1), pp.100~103 (2012)
  49. "Oejae-jip"[URL]
  50. "Mogeun-go"[URL]
  51. "Taekdang-jip"[URL]
  52. "Jibong-jip"[URL]
  53. "Godam ilgo" (1891)[URL]
  54. Yi, Ui-gang, "Jeongjo ui Dang-Song palgamun bipyeong sogo", Minjok munhwa, 16, pp.145~170 (1993)
  55. "Dogok-jip"[URL]
  56. "Gaogorak"[URL]
  57. Yu, Bong-hak, "Gaehyeok gwa galdeung ui sidae: Jeongjo wa 19-segi" (2009), Singu munhwasa
  58. "Yeongjae-jip"[URL]
  59. "Okbong-jip"[URL]
  60. "Eou-jip" (1832)[URL]
  61. Yu, Seong-jun, "Cheong sihwa wa Joseon sihwa ui Dang siron" (2008), Pureun sasangsa
  62. "Woljeong manpil"[URL]
  63. Zha, Hongde, "Yuan dai shixue tonglun" (2014), Beijing daxue chubanshe
  64. Zheng, Yongxiao, "Zong Tang, lian Tang yu Song Jin Yuan shi feng de shanbian", Nandu xuetan, 36(1), pp.57~62 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

韩国诗话中的唐诗優劣论서보여중국어문연구회 · 중국어문논총2024 · 제118호Poetic Criticism in the Mid-Joseon Period: Focusing on Arguments about the Tang and Song Styles in the Early 17th Century조융희한국학중앙연구원 · Korea Journal2005 · 제45권 제2호朝鲜前期至中期诗话中的“李杜之争”Liu Kaiqi한국중국문화학회 · 중국학논총2024 · 제86호SONG CHINA’S ROLE IN SHAPING LATE KORYŎ LITERATURE: AN ANALYTICAL SURVEY OF THE TONGMUNSŎNXIN WEI한국학연구원 · Acta Koreana2007 · 제10권 제1호『二十四詩品』과 18·19세기 朝鮮의 士大夫 文藝안대회규장각한국학연구원 · 한국문화2011 · 제56호中國詩學視野下的韓國漢詩取徑論 — 以韓國詩話爲中心서보여중국어문연구회 · 중국어문논총2025 · 제122호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)

Ceramic Culture of Goryeo이강한pp. 6-9Perception of Goryeo Celadon in the Context of the Late Joseon Period장남원pp. 11-40Plantain Designs on Goryeo Celadon, How They Developed, and What They Meant이준광pp. 41-84The Emergence and Iconography of Seosu (Auspicious Beasts) in the Twelfth-century Goryeo Celadon김윤정pp. 85-126The Origin and Symbolic Meanings: of the Designs on the 12th century Goryeo Celadon Roof Tiles조은정pp. 127-176
원문 보기