『동유학안東儒學案』을 통해 본 조선 유학사 서술의 두 가지 양상: 1940년대 편찬된 『동유학안』 2종을 중심으로

Abstract

The Dongyuhakan(『東儒學案』) is one of the Hakan(學案) that covers Confucian scholars and their theories since Th ree Kingdoms Period. Th ere are two version of it, compiled during the Japanese colonial era, one by Ha Kyeomjin(河謙鎭) and the other by Kwon Ohwan(權五煥). The two Dongyuhakans show signifi cant diff erence in their composition and narrative styles. The Dongyuhakans compiled by Ha and Kwon relatively focused more on the description of Yeongnam School than Giho School, since the compilers both had ties with Yeongnam School. Ha, however, categorized the works based on the schools, sorted the works that express the theories and academic characteristics, and briefl y described the origins of each school in the introduction part of each Hakan. In contrary, Kwon categorized the works based on family name of the clans and organized nationwide scholars. In Dongyuhakan Volume 1, Kwon extracted and compiled the assessment of scholars and their quotations from various historical records. Other volumes, however, list the scholars representing each clan and their descendants. Th ese volumes also showed a characteristic as a roster by briefl y describing the name, pen name, career, kinship, etc, under the names of each clan’s scholars in the columnella. Th is study holds signifi cance in newly discovering and introducing Dongyuhakan of Kwon, which has not been studied before, and compared and contrasted the narrative styles of two Dongyuhakans to fi gure out the two formative narrative styles of the Joseon Confucianism during the Japanese colonial era.