Net Neutrality in France: an overview
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Net neutrality has brought about a very activedebate in France since 2010. The current legalframework pertaining to this crucial issue forthe future of the Internet very much reflects themultiplication of regulators and courts involved inthe telecommunications and Internet regulation. ARCEP, the Sector regulator has of course beenthe most heavily involved since it issued its 2010“Ten proposals”. Compared to the Korean KCCguidelines, these proposals follow the same goalbut with a larger scope, a much more detailedand “hands on” approach. Since then, ARCEPhas started to implement some of its monitoringmechanisms with the support of the courts,especially the French Council of State. Net neutralityhas also been dealt with by the French CompetitionAuthority in the Cogent vs. France Telecomcase, the first case of abuse of dominant powerfiled against a telecommunications operator by acontent provider. Constitutional values are also atstake, since the Constitutional council has beenruling since 2009 that access to the Internet is akey element to effectively implement Freedom ofspeech. In this complicated legal framework, theExecutive - rather critical against ARCEP policy- and the Legislative – more proactive – arepostponing the preparation of a draft Bill. As aconclusion, this article demonstrates the activismand independence of the sector regulator, andthe necessity to broaden Net neutrality to activitiesbeyond data transport, such as device neutralityand search engine neutrality. Finally, it favourslasting regulation given the economics inherent todata transport.
Abstract
Net neutrality has brought about a very activedebate in France since 2010. The current legalframework pertaining to this crucial issue forthe future of the Internet very much reflects themultiplication of regulators and courts involved inthe telecommunications and Internet regulation. ARCEP, the Sector regulator has of course beenthe most heavily involved since it issued its 2010“Ten proposals”. Compared to the Korean KCCguidelines, these proposals follow the same goalbut with a larger scope, a much more detailedand “hands on” approach. Since then, ARCEPhas started to implement some of its monitoringmechanisms with the support of the courts,especially the French Council of State. Net neutralityhas also been dealt with by the French CompetitionAuthority in the Cogent vs. France Telecomcase, the first case of abuse of dominant powerfiled against a telecommunications operator by acontent provider. Constitutional values are also atstake, since the Constitutional council has beenruling since 2009 that access to the Internet is akey element to effectively implement Freedom ofspeech. In this complicated legal framework, theExecutive - rather critical against ARCEP policy- and the Legislative – more proactive – arepostponing the preparation of a draft Bill. As aconclusion, this article demonstrates the activismand independence of the sector regulator, andthe necessity to broaden Net neutrality to activitiesbeyond data transport, such as device neutralityand search engine neutrality. Finally, it favourslasting regulation given the economics inherent todata transport.
참고문헌 (8)
- ARCEP, "Internet and network neutrality : Proposals and recommendations" (2010), Les Actes de l’ARCEP
- "Rapport relatif à l’avis net neutralitéN°2013-1 du 1er mars 2013" (2013)[URL]
- Didier, Michel, "Infrastructures de transport, mobilité et croissance", Rapport du Conseil d’analyse économique, (69) (2007), Documentation française
- "Report to Parliament and the Government on Net Neutrality" (2012)[URL]
- Kosciusko-Morizet, "Nathalie, La neutralité d’Internet, un atout pour le développement de l’économie numérique , Rapport du Gouvernement au Parlement en application de l’article 33 de la loi n°2009-1572du 17 décembre 2009 relative à la lutte contre la fracture numérique", Secrétariat d’Etat à la prospective et au développement de l’économie numérique (2009)
- Maxwell, Winston, "Net neutrality in Europe: An economic and legal analysis", Concurrences, (4), pp.44~53 (2010)
- Tran Thiet, "Net neutrality – interconnection:The French Competition Authority obtains commitments to improve transparency regarding interconnection activities but does not prohibit from charging a fee for the opening of additional interconnection capacities", Concurrences, (4), pp.159~160 (2012)
- Wachsmann, Anne, "Ciseau tarifaire – engagements :L’Autorité de la concurrence rend obligatoires les engagements pris par l’opérateur dominant relativement à la possibilité de pratiques de ciseau tarifaire sur le marché de la connectivitéInternet", Concurrences, (1), pp.87~89 (2013)
