본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Platform Law in Europe - Combatting Digital Harms Through Co-Regulation -

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Platform law has become the cause celebre of technology regulation: a call to regulate the intermediaries who provide platforms for net- worked digital services. 1) These include the GAFAM giants: Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple and Microsoft. 2) It resulted in new laws in France and Germany in 2017-18, 3) and an entire platform law agenda “Path to the Digital Decade” in the European Commission, 4) which is rapidly moving from rhetoric to reality in legislative proposals. 5) Many policy en- trepreneurs peddle solutions as the policy cycle turns, in a classic case of “solutions chasing a problem.” 6) Hard law, in the shape of the proposed European Digital Services Act (DSA) to be agreed in April 2022, will continue in the coming decade to be accompanied by Codes of Conduct (CoCs) and other self- or co-regulatory measures. In 2020-22, the world was plunged into a deep economic and social depression due to the COVID19 pandemic and recovery inflation, with broadband connectivity and Internet platforms ever more vital to enforced home workers. 7) Even as legislatures introduce hard law to combat their particular favourite online harm, continued emphasis will focus on giant GAFAM platforms’ self-regulatory practices. In 2022, reforms to digital platform law were debated in parliaments including the European Parliament, United States Congress and British Parliament. 8) I argue that the approach taken to combatting problematic practices on digital platforms (so-called “Online Harms”) will be through co-regulation of CoCs, 9) though with some direct enforcement notably of ‘app stores’ via competition law. 10) The article is structured as follows. In the Introduction, I explain the legislative reforms pro- posed and outline their scope. In the following Section, I explain the competition law actions al- ready implemented and currently ongoing against platforms, notably app stores. In the third section, I explain how CoCs are used, taking as a case study disinformation regulation. In the final section, I conclude by explaining that it is CoCs utilised in both competition law and co-regulatory actions that are likely to be the enforcement method of choice for digital platform regulation.

Abstract

Platform law has become the cause celebre of technology regulation: a call to regulate the intermediaries who provide platforms for net- worked digital services. 1) These include the GAFAM giants: Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple and Microsoft. 2) It resulted in new laws in France and Germany in 2017-18, 3) and an entire platform law agenda “Path to the Digital Decade” in the European Commission, 4) which is rapidly moving from rhetoric to reality in legislative proposals. 5) Many policy en- trepreneurs peddle solutions as the policy cycle turns, in a classic case of “solutions chasing a problem.” 6) Hard law, in the shape of the proposed European Digital Services Act (DSA) to be agreed in April 2022, will continue in the coming decade to be accompanied by Codes of Conduct (CoCs) and other self- or co-regulatory measures. In 2020-22, the world was plunged into a deep economic and social depression due to the COVID19 pandemic and recovery inflation, with broadband connectivity and Internet platforms ever more vital to enforced home workers. 7) Even as legislatures introduce hard law to combat their particular favourite online harm, continued emphasis will focus on giant GAFAM platforms’ self-regulatory practices. In 2022, reforms to digital platform law were debated in parliaments including the European Parliament, United States Congress and British Parliament. 8) I argue that the approach taken to combatting problematic practices on digital platforms (so-called “Online Harms”) will be through co-regulation of CoCs, 9) though with some direct enforcement notably of ‘app stores’ via competition law. 10) The article is structured as follows. In the Introduction, I explain the legislative reforms pro- posed and outline their scope. In the following Section, I explain the competition law actions al- ready implemented and currently ongoing against platforms, notably app stores. In the third section, I explain how CoCs are used, taking as a case study disinformation regulation. In the final section, I conclude by explaining that it is CoCs utilised in both competition law and co-regulatory actions that are likely to be the enforcement method of choice for digital platform regulation.

참고문헌 (158)

  1. "A Global Perspective on the Apple App Store Ecosystem: An exploration of small businesses within the App Store ecosystem" (2020)[URL]
  2. "Apple Inc v Pepper (2019) 139 S. Ct. 1514" (2019)[URL]
  3. Armstrong M., "Two-sided markets, competitive bottlenecks and exclusive contracts", Economic Theory, 32, pp.353~380 (2007)
  4. Barnes, Fod, "Regulating the Global Information Society", pp.117~124 (2000), Routledge
  5. "Covid misinformation on Facebook is killing people – Biden" (2021)[URL]
  6. "BBC" (2021)[URL]
  7. "Online Safety Bill ‘catastrophic for free speech’" (2021)[URL]
  8. "WhatsApp skewed Brazilian election, proving social medias danger to democracy" (2018)[URL]
  9. Benkler, Yochai, "Communications Infrastructure Regulation and the Distribution of Control Over Content", TELECOMM. POL’Y, 22, pp.183~ (1998)
  10. "BEREC: BoR (21) 119 Report on the implementation of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 and BEREC Open Internet Guidelines 2021"[URL]
  11. Binns, Reuben, "Is that your final decision? Multi-stage profiling, selective effects, and Article 22 of the GDPR", Int’l Data Privacy L, 11, pp.319~ (2021)
  12. "Balancing Act: Countering Digital Disinformation while Respecting Freedom of Expression. Broadband Commission research report on Freedom of Expression and Addressing Disinformation on the Internet" (2020)[URL]
  13. The role of artificial intelligence in disinformation, "Bontridder, Noémi", Namur Digital Institute, Faculty of Law, ~ (2021)
  14. Bourreau M., "Digital Conglomerates and EU Competition Policy", ~
  15. Google, "Fitbit will monetise health data and harm consumers", Bourreau, Marc, 2020, CEPR Policy Insight No 107
  16. Brown, I., "Regulating Code" (2013), MIT Press
  17. "Key points on DMA interoperability and encryption" (2022)[URL]
  18. Brown, Ian, "App stores, antitrust and related regulation: the European policy and academic debate, submitted to Internet Policy Review, pending", ~ (2022)
  19. "C(2018) 2393 final Commission decision of 26.04.2018 Group of Experts for the Observatory on the Online Platform Economy (E03607)", Publication on the register of expert groups, ~ (2018)
  20. Cadwalladr, Carole, "I made Steve Bannon’s psychological warfare tool': meet the data war whistleblower", The Observer, ~ (2018)
  21. "What are we regulating for?" (2021)[URL]
  22. "Case IV", 36.539 British Interactive Broadcasting (BiB, renamed Open), 781, pp.EC), 1999[DOI]
  23. "Case M.9660 GOOGLE FITBIT merger conditions of 17.12.2020: Art. 8(2) with conditions & obligations OJ C194 Of 21.05.2021 published on 11.05.2021", ~ (2021)
  24. Cave, M., "Competition and the exercise of market power in broadcasting: a review of recent UK experience", info, 7(5), pp.20~28 (2005)[DOI]
  25. "COM(2020) 65 final European Commission White Paper On Artificial Intelligence - A European approach to excellence and trust Brussels", ~ (2020)
  26. "COM(2020) 825 final 2020", 0361(COD) ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Single Market For Digital Services (Digital Services Act) and amending Directive 2000, EC’; European Commission (2021) ‘Digital Services Act’, Exchange of views Internal Market Committee European Parliament[DOI]
  27. "COM(2020) 842 - Contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act)", ~
  28. "COM(2021) 574 final 2021", 0293 (COD) Proposal for a Decision Of The European Parliament And Of The Council establishing the 2030 Policy Programme “Path to the Digital Decade” Brussels, 15.9.2021, 2021
  29. "Online platforms and digital advertising Market Study" (2019)[URL]
  30. Cooper, Alissa, "Net Neutrality: Discrimination, Competition, and Innovation in the UK and US", ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 15(1), pp.1~21 (2015)[DOI]
  31. Craufurd Smith, Rachael, "Fake news, French Law and democratic legitimacy: lessons for the United Kingdom?", Journal of Media Law, 11(1), pp.52~81 (2019)[DOI]
  32. "Digital policy for the digital era - Special Advisers’ report for Commissioner Vestager" (2018)[URL]
  33. Michael A Cusumano, "Can self-regulation save digital platforms?", Industrial and Corporate Change, 30(5), pp.1259~1285 (2021), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
  34. Cusumano, Michael A, "The Future of Platforms", MIT Sloan Management Review, 61(3), pp.46~54 (2020)
  35. David, Paul, "The Economics of Compatibility of Standards: A Survey", Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1(1-2), pp.3~41 (1990)
  36. "Digital Services Act (DSA)" (2021)[URL]
  37. "Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter Delivers Keynote at CRA Conference" (2022)[URL]
  38. Fabiana Di Porto, "Co-regulating algorithmic disclosure for digital platforms", Policy and Society, 40(2), pp.272~293 (2020), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
  39. Unlocking digital competition, Report of the Digital Competition Expert Panel, known as the Furman report, "Digital Competition Expert Panel", ~ (2019)
  40. "Draft Online Safety Bill (Joint Committee)" (2021)[URL]
  41. Economides, "Network Neutrality on the Internet: A Two-sided Market Analysis", Information Economics and Policy, 24, pp.91~104 (2012)
  42. "Slave to the Algorithm? Why a “Right to Explanation” is Probably Not the Remedy You are Looking for" (2017)[URL]
  43. "Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc. 2021 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California) September 10, Case No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR"[URL]
  44. Erdos, David, "European Data Protection Regulation and Online New Media: Mind the Enforcement Gap", Journal of Law and Society, 43(4), pp.534~564 (2016)[DOI]
  45. "ERGA Report on disinformation: Assessment of the implementation of the Code of Practice" (2020)[URL]
  46. "Antitrust: Commission fines Google 2.42 billion € for abusing dominance as search engine by giving illegal advantage to own comparison shopping service – Factsheet" (2017)[URL]
  47. "Speech by Johannes Laitenberger, Director-General for Competition, EU competition law in innovation and digital markets: fairness and the consumer welfare perspective" (2017)[URL]
  48. "Antitrust: Commission Fines Google €4.34 Billion for Illegal Practices Regarding Android Mobile Devices to Strengthen Dominance of Google’s Search Engine" (2018)[URL]
  49. "Code of Practice on disinformation" (2018)[URL]
  50. "European Democracy Action Plan: making EU democracies stronger" (2020)[URL]
  51. European Commission, "Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Single Market For Digital Services (Digital Services Act) and amending Directive 2000", 31, 0361 (COD) 15 December, 2020[DOI]
  52. "Annual country reports on Open Internet 1 May 2020 to 30 April" (2021)[URL]
  53. "Code of Practice on Disinformation: The strengthened Code of Practice" (2021)[URL]
  54. "Guidance on Strengthening the Code of Practice on Disinformation, COM(2021) 262 final" (2021)[URL]
  55. European Commission, "State of the Union: Commission proposes a Path to the Digital Decade to deliver the EU’s digital transformation by 2030", Press release, ~ (2021)
  56. "Disinformation: online platforms continue the Code of Practice revision in light of the war in Ukraine and report on first 2022 actions to fight COVID-19 disinformation" (2022)[URL]
  57. "Self-Regulation of Digital Media Converging on the Internet: Industry Codes of Conduct in Sectoral Analysis, Final Report of IAPCODE Project for European Commission DG Information Society Safer Internet Action Plan, 30 April, Section 12.7" (2004)[URL]
  58. "Amendments adopted on 20 January 2022 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Single Market For Digital Services (Digital Services Act) and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (COM(2020)0825 –C9-0418/2020 – 2020/0361(COD)" (2022)[URL]
  59. "New Digital Services Act (DSA) is disappointing" (2020)[URL]
  60. "Better Regulation" (2016)[URL]
  61. "Archive: Internet access and use statistics - households and individuals Revision as of 15:34, 28 March 2018 by Verdodo" (2018)[URL]
  62. Evans Philip, "Blown To Bits: How The New Economics Of Information Transforms Strategy", ~ (1999)
  63. Evans, D. S., "The Antitrust Economics of Multi-Sided Platform Markets", YALE J. ON REGULATION, 20(2), pp.325~381 (2003)
  64. Evans, David S., "Some Empirical Aspects of Multi-Sided Platform Industries", REV. NETWORK ECON, 2, pp.191~ (2003)
  65. "Essays on the Economics of Two-Sided Markets: Economics, Antitrust and Strategy" (2010)[URL]
  66. "The Role of Market Definition in Assessing Anti-Competitive Harm in Ohio v. American Express" (2019)[URL]
  67. Fabiana Di Porto, "Co-regulating algorithmic disclosure for digital platforms", Policy and Society, 40(2), pp.272~293 (2020), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
  68. Fargon, Bar, "Risky Fine Print: A Novel Typology of Ethical Risks in Mobile App User Agreements", Villanova Law Review, 66, pp.483~ (2021)
  69. Federico G., "Antitrust and Innovation: Welcoming and Protecting Disruption", Innovation Policy and the Economy, 20, pp.125~190 (2020)
  70. "These Countries Have the Most People on Twitter" (2021)[URL]
  71. Frischmann, Brett M., "An Economic Theory of Infrastructure and Commons Management", Minnesota Law Review, 89, pp.917~1030 (2005)
  72. Froomkin, A. Michael, "Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA and the Constitution", DUKE L.J, 50, pp.17~ (2000)
  73. "Vertical Merger Guidelines" (2020)[URL]
  74. "Federal Trade Commission Withdraws Vertical Merger Guidelines and Commentary: 2020 guidance withdrawn to prevent industry and judicial reliance on unsound economic theories; FTC to work with DOJ to update merger guidance" (2021)[URL]
  75. Gawer, Annabelle, "Competition in the Cloud: Unleashing Investment and Innovation within and across Platforms", Communications & Strategies, (85), pp.45~62 (2012)
  76. Geradin, Damien, "The Antitrust Case Against the Apple App Store", Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 17(3), pp.503~585 (2021)[DOI]
  77. "2017 Annual Report" (2018)[URL]
  78. Hart O., "Vertical Integration and Market Foreclosure", Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics, 1990, pp.205~286 (1990), Brookings Institution
  79. Hildebrandt, Mireille, "Primitives of Legal Protection in the Era of Data-Driven Platforms", GEO. L. TECH. REV, 2, pp.252~ (2018)
  80. "House of Representatives" (2019)[URL]
  81. "House of Representatives 107-803 - Legislative Review Activities Of The Committee On International Relations 107th Congress (2001-2002)", ~
  82. Weiser, P., "The Future of Internet Regulation", U.C. Davis L. Rev, 43, pp.529~590 (2009)
  83. "Antitrust Remedies for Big Tech, Opinion: Technology" (2021)[URL]
  84. Hovenkamp, Herbert, "Antitrust and Platform Monopoly", Yale Law Journal, 130, pp.1952~ (2021)[DOI]
  85. Ibáñez Colomo, Pablo, "Anticompetitive Effects in EU Competition Law", Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 17 (2021)[DOI]
  86. "Inter Institutional agreement on better regulation 13 April, 2016, OJ L123, 12 May"[URL]
  87. "Inter-Institutional Agreement on Better Law-Making, OJ C 321, 31.12.2003", 1~5 (2003)
  88. "Internet Science Network of Excellence FP7 Grant No 288021"[URL]
  89. "Internet User Statistics, Facebook & 2017 Population for the 28 European Union member states" (2017)[URL]
  90. "European Commissioner" (2022)[URL]
  91. Katz Michael L., "Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities", J. POL. ECON, 94, pp.822~ (1986)
  92. Kennedy, Rónán, "Rethinking Reflexive Law for the Information Age: Hybrid and Flexible Regulation by Disclosure", GEO. WASH. ENERGY & ENVTL. L. REV, 7, pp.124~ (2016)
  93. "Report on #disinformation and freedom of opinion & expression" (2021)[URL]
  94. Kingdon, John W., "Agendas, Alternatives, And Public Policies", ~ (1984)
  95. What’s Next in Apple Inc. v. Pepper? The Indirect Purchaser Rule and the Economics of Pass-Through, "Kobayashi, Bruce H.", ~, pp.George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 19-22 (2019)
  96. Kroll, Joshua A., "Accountable Algorithms", University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 165 (2017)
  97. Krzepicki, Alexander, "The Impulse to Condemn the Strange: Assessing Big Data in Antitrust", CPI Antitrust Chronicle, 2(2), pp.16~20 (2020)
  98. Comparative Analysis of International Co- and Self-Regulation in Communications Markets, "Latzer, Michael", Ofcom, ~ (2007)
  99. Laux, Johann, "Taming the few: Platform regulation, independent audits, and the risks of capture created by the DMA and DSA", Computer Law & Security Review, 43 (2021)[DOI]
  100. Lemley Mark A., "Legal Implications of Network Eocnomic Effects", CAL. L. REV, 86, pp.479~ (1998)
  101. "Online harms: a comparative analysis" (2021)[URL]
  102. "AI Select Committee: AI Report" (2017)[URL]
  103. MacSíthigh, Daithí, "App law within: rights and regulation in the smartphone age", International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 21(2), pp.154~186 (2013)[DOI]
  104. Options for and Effectiveness of Internet Self- and Co-Regulation, "Marsden C.", RAND Corporation, ~, pp.TR-566-EC (2008)
  105. Marsden, C., "Network neutrality: Towards a Co-Regulatory Solution" (2010), Bloomsbury
  106. Chris Marsden, "How law and computer science can work together to improve the information society", Communications of the ACM, 61(1), pp.29~31 (2017), Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)[DOI]
  107. Marsden, C., "Prosumer Law and Network Platform Regulation: The Long View Towards Creating Offdata", Georgetown Tech. L.R, 2(2), pp.376~398 (2018)
  108. "Predictions 2019" (2019)[URL]
  109. "Interoperability: A solution to regulating AI and social media platforms Computers and Law" (2019)[URL]
  110. Marsden, C., "Regulating the Global Information Society" (2000), Routledge
  111. Marsden, Chris, "Specific Sensitive Data Deregulation (SSDD): the Portarlington-Valetta-Nicosia-Bucharest Effect in Global Data Protection Law", Gikii Law Conference (2018)
  112. Regulating Disinformation with Artificial Intelligence (AI): The effects of disinformation initiatives on freedom of expression and media pluralism, Report for Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA), "Marsden, Chris", Scientific Foresight Unit of the Directorate for Impact Assessment and European Added Value, Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services (EPRS) of the Secretariat of the European Parliament, ~ (2019)
  113. Marsden, Chris, "Regulating Big Tech: Policy Responses to Digital Dominance" (2021), Oxford University Press
  114. Marsden, Christopher T., "Internet Co-Regulation: European Law, Regulatory Governance And Legitimacy In Cyberspace" (2011), Cambridge University Press
  115. Marsden, Christopher T., "Network Neutrality: From Policy To Law To Regulation" (2017), Manchester University Press
  116. Marsden, Christopher, "Platform values and democratic elections: How can the law regulate digital disinformation?", Computer Law & Security Review, 36, pp.105373~ (2020)
  117. Newman Abraham L., "Self-Regulatory Trajectories in the Shadow of Public Power: Resolving Digital Dilemmas in Europe and the United States", Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 17(3), pp.387~413 (2004)
  118. "Digital Economy Outlook" (2017)[URL]
  119. Ofcom, "Identifying appropriate regulatory solutions: principles for analysing self and co-regulation", ~ (2008)
  120. "A report on our approach to monitoring and ensuring compliance with the Open Internet Regulation from May 2020 to October 2021" (2021)[URL]
  121. "Internet Access - Households and Individuals, 2012, Figure 1: Households with Internet Access, 1998 to 2012" (2012)[URL]
  122. Oftel, "Beyond the Telephone, the TV and the PC: Consultation Document", ~ (1995)
  123. "Apple: Tech giants have wiped out $2 trillion in capitalization since their records" (2022)[URL]
  124. "Bill 285 House of Commons: A Bill to make provision for and in connection with the regulation by OFCOM of certain internet services; for and in connection with communications offences; and for connected purposes" (2021)[URL]
  125. Pitofsky, Robert, "Chairman, Fed. Trade Comm’n, Self Regulation and Antitrust", D.C. Bar Association Symposium (1998)
  126. Price M., "Self-Regulation and the Internet" (2005), Kluwer
  127. Purtova, Nadezhda, "The Law of Everything: Broad Concept of Personal Data and Overstretched Scope of EU Data Protection Law", L. INN. & TECH, 10 (2018)
  128. Chris Reed, "How should we regulate artificial intelligence?", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2128), pp.20170360~ (2018), The Royal Society[DOI]
  129. "Regulation 2016", 679 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and repealing Directive 95, EC (General Data Protection Regulation) 2016 O.J. (L 119) 59[DOI]
  130. L 186, "55", ~
  131. "David Evans v Richard Schmalensee in Epic v Apple" (2021)[URL]
  132. Rochet Jean-Charles, "Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets", I J. EUR. ECON. ASSOC, pp.990~1029 (2003)
  133. Rochet, Jean-Charles, "Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets", CPI Journal, Competition Policy International, 10 (2014)
  134. Sampson, Anthony, "The Sovereign State of ITT" (1973), Stein and Day
  135. "The Guardian" (2018)[URL]
  136. Schmalensee R., "An instant classic: Rochet & Tirole, platform competition in two-sided markets", COMPETITION POL’Y INT'L (2014)
  137. Shapiro Carl, "Information Rules: A Strategic Guide To The Network Economy" (1999), Harvard Business School Press
  138. Shapiro, C., "Antitrust in a time of populism", International Journal of Industrial Organization, 61, pp.714~748 (2018)
  139. "Missing the Forest for the Trees: A Reply to Hovenkamp and Shapiro" (2021)[URL]
  140. "The sounding Board’s unanimous final opinion on the co-called Code of Practice" (2018)[URL]
  141. Stigler, George, "The Theory of Economic Regulation", The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), pp.3~21 (1971)
  142. Stucke Maurice E., "Should we be concerned about dataopolies?", GEO. L. TECH. REV, 2, pp.275~ (2018)
  143. Sunderland Joe, "European Commission VIGIE number: 2020", 630 Digital Markets Act - Impact Assessment support study: Executive Summary and Synthesis Report, 117381 European Commission VIGIE number: 2020, pp.630[DOI]
  144. Tarrant, A., "Big Tech Lobbying in the EU", The Political Quarterly (2022)[DOI]
  145. "Nobel Prize Lecture: Market Failures and Public Policy" (2014)[URL]
  146. "A new pro-competition regime for digital markets: Consultation" (2021)[URL]
  147. Veale, Michael, "The General Data Protection Regulation: An Opportunity for the CHI Community?", (CHIGDPR 2018), Workshop at ACM CHI’18 (2018)
  148. Vestager, M., "Algorithms and Competition", Speech at the Bundeskartellamt 18th Conference on Competition (2017)
  149. Vestager, M., "Competition and a fair deal for consumers online", Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets Fifth Anniversary Conference (2018)
  150. Wagner, Ben, "Regulating transparency? Facebook, Twitter and the German Network Enforcement Act", Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT* ’20), pp.261~271 (2020), Association for Computing Machinery
  151. "Tackling online harm – a regulators perspective: Speech by Sharon White to the Royal Television Society" (2018)[URL]
  152. Wright, Joshua D., "One-sided Logic in Two-sided Markets", Review of Network Economics, 3(1), pp.44~64 (2004)
  153. Wright, Joshua D., "The Easterbrook Theorem: An Application to Digital Markets", Yale Law Journal Forum, 130, pp.622~646 (2021)[DOI]
  154. Wylie, Christopher, "Mindf*ck: inside Cambridge Analytica’s plot to break the world" (2019), Profile Books
  155. Zittrain, J., "The Generative Internet", Harvard Law Review, 119, pp.1974~ (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)