Aufbau und Verfall des Ius Commune in der ostasiatischen Rechtsgeschichte
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article, originally drafted for the 37th Conference of the Deutscher Rechts- historikertag on September 5-9, 2008 in Passau/Germany, aims to survey the whole process of the formation and the deformation of the East Asian Common Law (ius commune). It has been gradually clear, that the concept of the “common law” becomes more important for the East Asian community in the formation. In the first part, the author tries to make a short introduction of the Chinese, Korean and Japanese legal histories to the Western audiences. He maintains that the national legal histories of these three countries must be reviewed from the transnational perspective. In the second part, my “Choi-Thesis” on the East Asian Common Law is explained. It is composed of seven elements: 1) Codification, 2) Legal Confucianism, 3) Judicial Reasoning, 4) Community Compacts, 5) Traditional Jurisprudence, 6) Mediation and Reconciliation, 7) Sea Trade Law. In the third part, the formation of the jurisprudence during Tokugawa- Japanese is elaborated. The author reveals the historical fact that it became a sort of common jurisprudence with the participations of the Chinese and Korean legal scholars like Chu Shunshi (1600-82), Yi Chinyoung (1571-1633) and his son etc. In the fourth part, the author shows seven legal cases, which arose between Tokugawa Japan and the Joseon Kingdom. He arues that these two states could succeed in finding the solution through their common legal reasoning. In the fifth part, the fall of East Asian order is explained as the process of the reception (or imposition) of the Western law in East Asia. The Western judicial counselors were invited to these countries to modernize (westernize) the traditional common law. Good or bad, the legal integration is necessary for the formation of the East Asian community. For this purpose, the concept of the East Asian common law is necessarily important. All jurists in this region should keep in mind this task for the better furure.
Abstract
This article, originally drafted for the 37th Conference of the Deutscher Rechts- historikertag on September 5-9, 2008 in Passau/Germany, aims to survey the whole process of the formation and the deformation of the East Asian Common Law (ius commune). It has been gradually clear, that the concept of the “common law” becomes more important for the East Asian community in the formation. In the first part, the author tries to make a short introduction of the Chinese, Korean and Japanese legal histories to the Western audiences. He maintains that the national legal histories of these three countries must be reviewed from the transnational perspective. In the second part, my “Choi-Thesis” on the East Asian Common Law is explained. It is composed of seven elements: 1) Codification, 2) Legal Confucianism, 3) Judicial Reasoning, 4) Community Compacts, 5) Traditional Jurisprudence, 6) Mediation and Reconciliation, 7) Sea Trade Law. In the third part, the formation of the jurisprudence during Tokugawa- Japanese is elaborated. The author reveals the historical fact that it became a sort of common jurisprudence with the participations of the Chinese and Korean legal scholars like Chu Shunshi (1600-82), Yi Chinyoung (1571-1633) and his son etc. In the fourth part, the author shows seven legal cases, which arose between Tokugawa Japan and the Joseon Kingdom. He arues that these two states could succeed in finding the solution through their common legal reasoning. In the fifth part, the fall of East Asian order is explained as the process of the reception (or imposition) of the Western law in East Asia. The Western judicial counselors were invited to these countries to modernize (westernize) the traditional common law. Good or bad, the legal integration is necessary for the formation of the East Asian community. For this purpose, the concept of the East Asian common law is necessarily important. All jurists in this region should keep in mind this task for the better furure.
참고문헌 (36)
- Chongko Choi, "Law and Justice in Korea. in: South and North" (2005), Seoul National University Press
- Chongko Choi, "East Asian Jurisprudence" (2009), Seoul National University Press
- Helmut Coing u.a., "Die Japanisierung des Westlichen Rechts" (1990), Tübingen
- Oskar Weggel, "Chinesische Rechtsgeschichte" (1980), Leiden
- Ben-Amy Shillony, "The Jews and the Japanese" (1991)
- "Harro von Senger, Die Kunst der List, München, 6. Aufl., 2007", ~ (2007)
- Randell Peerenbohm, "China’s Long March toward Rule of Law" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- "Alexander Hollerbach, Ausgewählte Schriften, Berlin, 2006", ~ (2006)
- Tung-Tsu Chu, "Law and Society in Traditional China" (1965), The Hague
- Yoshiyuki Noda, "Introduction to Japanese Law" (1976), Tokyo University Press
- Wallace Johnson, "The Tang Code" (1978), Princeton University Press
- Brian E. McKnight, "The Quality of Mercy. in: Amnesties and Traditional Chinese Justice" (1981), The University of Hawaii Press
- Maruyama Masao, "Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan" (1974), Tokyo University Press
- "Edward L. Farmer, Zhu Yuanzhang and Early Ming Legislation, Leiden, 1995", ~ (1995)
- Jiang Yonglin, "The Great Ming Code" (2004), University of Washington Press
- William Theodore de Bary, "The Rise of Neo-Confucianism in Korea" (1985), Columbia University Press
- "William Shaw, Legal Norms in a Confucian State, Berkeley, 1981", ~ (1981)
- "John Carey Hall, Japanese Feudal Law, Yokohama, 1906", ~ (1906)
- "Carl Steenstrup, A History of Law in Japan Unitl 1868, Leiden, 1991", ~ (1991)
- Karl Bünger, "Quellen zur Rechtsgeschichte der Tang-Zeit" (1946), Paiping
- Insun Yu, "Law and Society in 17th and 18th Century Vietnam" (1990), Korea University Press
- "Wolfgang Fikentscher, Methoden des Rechts in vergleichender Darstellung, Tübingen, 1976", ~ (1976)
- "Otto Franke, Geschichte des chinesischen Reiches, Berlin, 5 Bande, 1932-52", ~ (1932)
- "Charles A. Moore ed., Philosophy and Culture East and West, Honolulu, 1960", ~ (1960)
- Dirk Bodde, "Law in Imperial China" (1967), Harvard University Press
- "James Palais, Confucian Staecraft and Korean Institutions, Seattle, 1996", ~ (1996)
- Dan F. Henderson, "Conciliation and Japanese Law" (1965), Tokyo University Press
- "John H. Wigmore, Law and Justice in Tokugawa Japan, Tokyo, 1975", ~ (1975)
- "Brian E. McKnight ed., Law and Justice in Traditional East Asia, Honolulu, 1987", ~ (1987)
- Jerome Cohen, "Essays on Chinese Legal Tradition" (1980), Harvard University Press
- John Haley, "Authority without Power. in: Law and the Japanese Paradox" (1991), Oxford University Press
- "Walter Leifer, P.G. von Möllendorff: Ein Deutscher Staatsmann in Korea, Saarbrücken, 1988", ~ (1988)
- "Gustav Radbruch, Vorschule der Rechtsphiolsophie, Gőttigen, 2.Aufl., 1959", ~ (1959)
- "Paul Koschaker, Europa und Römisches Recht, Biederstein, 1947", ~ (1947)
- "Ernst Hirsch, Rezeption als sozialer Prozess, Berlin, 1981", ~ (1981)
- Alfred C. Oppler, "Legal Reform in Occupied Japan" (1976), Priceton University Press