교육과정 개정에 따른 과학의 본성 수준 및 반영정도 탐색: 7차 및 2009 개정교육과정사례 분석
Exploring the level of nature of science and its degree of revising curriculums: The case of the 7th and 2009 revised curriculums
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In line with the emphasis on the importance of nature of science recently, this paper examines the degree and level at which the 2009-revised convergence science textbook, developed from the common science under the 7th curriculum in South Korea, reflected nature of science according to the development of curriculum. ‘Nature of science’ was classified according to scientific view - which represents scientists' view - and naive view - which represents general thinking and scientific error concepts. Also, ‘Nature of science’ was classified according to the explicit method and implicit method in terms of teaching method. The level of nature of science was defined using the four occasions of scientific view, naive view, explicit teaching and implicit teaching. In order to identify the components and level of nature of science reflected in the textbook, using the 10 items which refer to Lederman(2001)'s 7 definitions, NOSAT (Nature of Science Analyzing Tool) was developed and used. The results are that, since the educational curriculum is changed from common science under 7th curriculum to 2009-revised convergence science, the degree of reflection was rather a withdrawal. On parts of theories of 7th common science curriculum except research parts, it was difficult to find explicit nature of science. Also on 2009-revised curriculum, nature of science, which is seen on 2007 curriculum, disappeared. It is suggested that the future curriculum emphasizes the importance of nature of science, and bolster the reflection of nature of science according to the changing curriculum. Nature of science should not be expressed limitedly, but instead, should be more positively reflected, and the reflection method should be not implicit but explicit, allowing direct teaching. Towards that end, writers of the textbook should have an accurate understanding of nature of science. And, for the right teaching, teachers' capabilities are important and it is necessary to train teachers to understand and act for nature of science.
Abstract
In line with the emphasis on the importance of nature of science recently, this paper examines the degree and level at which the 2009-revised convergence science textbook, developed from the common science under the 7th curriculum in South Korea, reflected nature of science according to the development of curriculum. ‘Nature of science’ was classified according to scientific view - which represents scientists' view - and naive view - which represents general thinking and scientific error concepts. Also, ‘Nature of science’ was classified according to the explicit method and implicit method in terms of teaching method. The level of nature of science was defined using the four occasions of scientific view, naive view, explicit teaching and implicit teaching. In order to identify the components and level of nature of science reflected in the textbook, using the 10 items which refer to Lederman(2001)'s 7 definitions, NOSAT (Nature of Science Analyzing Tool) was developed and used. The results are that, since the educational curriculum is changed from common science under 7th curriculum to 2009-revised convergence science, the degree of reflection was rather a withdrawal. On parts of theories of 7th common science curriculum except research parts, it was difficult to find explicit nature of science. Also on 2009-revised curriculum, nature of science, which is seen on 2007 curriculum, disappeared. It is suggested that the future curriculum emphasizes the importance of nature of science, and bolster the reflection of nature of science according to the changing curriculum. Nature of science should not be expressed limitedly, but instead, should be more positively reflected, and the reflection method should be not implicit but explicit, allowing direct teaching. Towards that end, writers of the textbook should have an accurate understanding of nature of science. And, for the right teaching, teachers' capabilities are important and it is necessary to train teachers to understand and act for nature of science.
참고문헌 (40)
- 강석진, "과학의 본성" (2014), 북스힐
- 강석진, "과학사를 이용한 소집단 토론 수업이 학생들의 과학의 본성에 대한 이해에 미치는 영향", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(5), pp.996~1007 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
- 곽승진, "청소년의 과학적 소양 향상을 위한 문제해결 모형 개발 연구", 한국도서관·정보학회지, 36(3), pp.21~38 (2005), 한국도서관·정보학회
- 김경순, "중학교 과학 ‘물질의 구성’ 단원에서 과학사 소재를 활용한 명시적ㆍ반성적 과학의 본성 수업의 효과", 한국과학교육학회지, 28(1), pp.89~99 (2008), 한국과학교육학회
- 김영선, "과학의 본성에 대한 예비과학교사들의 인식 분석", 석사, 지구과학교육전공, pp.2013
- 김희정, "예술 고등학생들의 명시적 과학의 본성 수업을 통한 개념 변화의 특성", 한국과학교육학회지, 33(2), pp.266~283 (2013), 한국과학교육학회
- 김경대, "과학영재들의 과학의 본성에 대한 인식", 한국과학교육학회지, 26(6), pp.743~752 (2006), 한국과학교육학회
- 교육부, "2009개정 과학과 교육과정", ~ (2011)
- 노태희, "과학의 본성에 대한 초등학생들의 견해", 한국과학교육학회지, 22(5), pp.882~891 (2002), 한국과학교육학회
- 박영신, "상황학습을 통한 과학 도슨트의 전문성 연구", 대한지구과학교육학회지, 8(1), pp.98~113 (2015), 대한지구과학교육학회
- 박창동, "과학의 본성에 대한 인식과 학습관에 따른 초등교사의 발문 유형", 석사, 초등과학교육, pp.2001
- 박현주, "과학적 소양의 관점에서 본 대학생들의 과학의 본성에 대한 이해", 한국과학교육학회지, 25(3), pp.390~399 (2005), 한국과학교육학회
- 백성혜, "과학의 본성에 대한 명시적인 수업이 예비 과학교사들의 인식 변화에 미치는 효과", 과학철학, 13(1), pp.83~106 (2010), 한국과학철학회
- 이영희, "질적 연구에 의한 고등학교 생명과학Ⅰ 교과서 생명과학의 이해 단원에 내포된 과학의 본성 분석", 교과교육학연구, 17(1), pp.173~197 (2013), 교과교육연구소
- 이영희, "우리나라 생명과학 관련 분야 재미 과학자들은 어떻게 과학의 본성을 이해하고 있는가", 한국과학교육학회지, 34(7), pp.677~691 (2014), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- 최준환, "과학사를 활용한 과학수업 적용을 통한 중학생들의 과학의 본성에 대한 이해의 발달", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(2), pp.221~239 (2009), 한국과학교육학회
- American Association for the Advancement of Science(AAAS), "Project 2061 : Science for all Americans" (1989), Oxford University Press
- American Association for the Advancement of Science(AAAS), "Benchmarks for scientific literacy" (1993), Oxford University Press
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., "An exploratory study of the knowledge base for science teaching", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, pp.673~699 (1997)
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., "The nature of science and instructional practice : making the unnatural natural", Science Education, 82, pp.417~436 (1998)
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., "Improving science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science : A critical review of the literature", International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), pp.665~701 (2000)
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., "Representations of nature of science in high School chemistry textbooks over the past four decades", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), pp.835~855 (2008)
- Collette, A. T., "Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools" (1986), Merrill publishing Company
- Chiappetta, E. L., "A qualitative analysis of high school chemistry textbooks for scientific literacy themes and expository learning aids", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, pp.936~951 (1991)
- Chiappetta, E. L., "Analysis of five high school biology textbooks used in the United States for inclusion of the nature of science", National Association for Research in Science Teaching meeting (2005)
- Hirsch, E. D., Jr., "Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know" (1987), Houghton Mifflin
- Hogan, K., "Exploring a process view of students' knowledge about the NOS", Science Education, 84(1), pp.51~70 (2000)
- Irwin, A. R., "Historical case studies : Teaching the nature of science in context", Science Education, 84(1), pp.5~26 (2000)
- Lederman, N. G., "Students and teachers conceptions of the nature of science : A review of the research", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), pp.331~359 (1992)
- Lederman, N. G., "Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners conceptions of nature of science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), pp.497~521 (2002)
- Lee, Y., "How do the high school biology textbooks introduce the nature of science?", National Association for Research in Science Teaching meeting (2008)
- National Research Council, "National science education standards" (1996), National Academy Press
- Meichtry Y, J., "Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: data from a case of curriculum development", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), pp.389~407 (1992)
- Miller J. D., "Scientific Literacy : A Conceptual and Empirical Review", Daedalus, 112(2), pp.29~48 (1983)
- Moss, D. M., "Can we be scientists, too? Secondary students'perceptions of scientific research from a project-based classroom", Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7(2), pp.139~161 (1998)
- Oliveira, A. W., "The implicit communication of nature of science and epistemology during inquiry discussion", Science Education, 96, pp.652~684 (2012)
- 박영신, "Exploring Preservice teachers’ Understandings about Scientific Literacy embedded in Science Camp at Science Center", 대한지구과학교육학회지, 6(1), pp.1~12 (2013), 대한지구과학교육학회
- 박영신, "Exploring the Characteristics of STEAM Program Developed by Docents and its educational impact in the Natural History Museum", 대한지구과학교육학회지, 7(1), pp.75~90 (2014), 대한지구과학교육학회
- Sequeira, M., "Alternative conceptions and history lf science in physics teacher education", Science Education, 75(1), pp.45~56 (1991)
- Ziman, J., "An instruction to science studies" (1984), Cambridge University Press