ASC를 이용한 품질특성의 중요도 결정
Determining the Importance Values of Quality Attributes Using ASC
0
조회
0
다운로드
27
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Determination of the importance values of quality attributes is very important to integrate the Kano model with QFD. A new method to determine the importance values of quality attributes is proposed. Methods: ASC(Average Satisfaction Coefficient) is proposed in order to determine the importance values of quality attributes. To evaluate the effectiveness of ASC, a case study of modern TV sets is conducted,and the performance of ASC is compared with direct importance evaluation and AHP pairwise comparisons. Results: The result of ASC application is similar with those of direct importance evaluation and AHP pairwise comparison. Conclusion: ASC is an effective instrument to determine the importance values of quality attributes. It doesn't need a cumbersome process like AHP pairwise comparison, and can be calculated using the data for the conventional Kano model.
Abstract
Purpose: Determination of the importance values of quality attributes is very important to integrate the Kano model with QFD. A new method to determine the importance values of quality attributes is proposed. Methods: ASC(Average Satisfaction Coefficient) is proposed in order to determine the importance values of quality attributes. To evaluate the effectiveness of ASC, a case study of modern TV sets is conducted,and the performance of ASC is compared with direct importance evaluation and AHP pairwise comparisons. Results: The result of ASC application is similar with those of direct importance evaluation and AHP pairwise comparison. Conclusion: ASC is an effective instrument to determine the importance values of quality attributes. It doesn't need a cumbersome process like AHP pairwise comparison, and can be calculated using the data for the conventional Kano model.
참고문헌 (29)
- Akao, Y., "Quality Function Deployment" (1992), Landsberg
- Berger, C., "Kano’s methods for understanding customer-defined quality", Center for Quality of Management Journal, 2, pp.2~36 (1993)
- Fong, D., "Using the self-stated importance questionnaire to interpret Kano questionnaire results", Center for Quality of Management Journal, 5(3), pp.21~23 (1996)
- Franceschini, F., "An application of quality function deployment to industrial training courses", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 15, pp.753~768 (1998)
- Garibay, C., "Evaluation of a digital library by means of quality function deployment(QFD)and the Kano model", The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36, pp.125~132 (2010)
- Hejaili, F. F., "Culture-Related Service Expectations : A Comparative Study Using the Kano Model", Q Manage Health Care, 18, pp.48~58 (2009)
- Herzberg, F., "The motivation to work" (1959), John Wiley & Sons
- Högström, C., "The theory of attractive quality and experience offerings", The TQM Journal, 23, pp.111~127 (2011)
- Högström, C., "How to create attractive and unique customer experiences : An application of Kano’s theory of attractive quality to recreational tourism", Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 28, pp.385~402 (2010)
- Hsu, C. H., "Integrating Kano model into quality function deployment to facilitate decision analysis for service quality", International Conference on Mathematics and Computers in Business and Economics Vancouver, Canada (2007)
- Jang, Heung-Yeop, "Determination of the relative importance of quality attributes in the Kano mode", (Submitted for publication), ~ (2012)
- Kano, N., "Attractive quality and must-be quality", Hinshitsu, 14, pp.147~156 (1984)
- Kano, N., "Life cycle and creation of attractive quality", Proceedings of the,4th QMOD Conference, Linkoping Sweden, pp.18~36 (2001)
- Kim, Yeun-Sung, "Total Quality Management" (1999), Park-Young-Sa
- Löfgren M., "Kano’s theory of attractive quality and packaging", Quality Management Journal, 12, pp.7~20 (2005)
- Lee, Yu-Cheng, "Quality function deployment implementation based on fuzzy Kano model : An application in PLM system", Computer & Industrial Engineering, 55, pp.48~63 (2008)
- 임성욱, "Kano 모델을 기반으로 한 잠재적 고객만족 개선지수", 품질경영학회지, 38(2), pp.248~260 (2010), 한국품질경영학회
- Matzler, K., "How to delight your customer", Journal of Product and Brand Management, 5, pp.6~18 (1996)
- Matzler, K., "How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano’s model of customer satisfaction into quality function development", Technovation, 18, pp.25~38 (1998)
- Saaty, T. L., "A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structure", Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, pp.234~281 (1977)
- Satty, T. L., "The analytic hierachy process" (1980), McGraw Hill
- Sauerwein, E., "Experiences with the reliability and validity of the Kano-method: comparison to alternate forms of classification of product requirements", The Eleventh Symposium on Quality Function Deployment, pp.416~429 (1999)
- Shahin, A., "Kano model : A dynamic approach for classifying and prioritising requirements of airline travellers with three case studies on international airlines", Total Quality Management, 20, pp.1003~1028 (2009)
- 신아름, "Kano 모델을 기반으로 총체적 고객만족계수의 개발에 관한 연구", 산업공학(IE interfaces), 20(4), pp.479~487 (2007), 대한산업공학회
- Sireli, Y., "Integration of Kano’s Model Into QFD for Multiple Product Design", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54, pp.380~390 (2007)
- Tan, K. C., "Integrating Kano’s model in the planning matrix of quality function deployment", Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 11, pp.1141~1151 (2000)
- Tan, K. C., "Integrating SERVQUAL and Kano’s model into QFD for service excellence development", Managing Service Quality, 11, pp.418~430 (2001)
- Tontini, G., "Integrating the Kano Model and QFD for Designing New Products", TQM & Business Excellence, 18, pp.599~612 (2007)
- 윤재욱, "Kano 품질속성 평가방법론들의 실증적 비교분석", 품질경영학회지, 37(4), pp.31~42 (2009), 한국품질경영학회