품질 속성의 가중치 선정을 위한 APC에 관한 연구
Developing APC for Weighting Quality Attributes
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Determining relative importance among many quality attributes under financial constraints is an important task. The weighted value of an attribute particularly in QFD, will influence on engineering characteristics and this will eventually influence the whole manufacturing process such as parts deployment, process planning, and production planning. Several scholars have suggested weighting formulas using CSC (Customer Satisfaction Coefficient) in the Kano model. However, previous research shows that the validity of the CSC approaches has not been proved systematically. The aim of the present study is to address drawbacks of CSC and to develop APC (Average Potential Coefficient), a new approach for weighting of quality attributes. For this, the current study investigated 33 quality attributes of e-learning and conducted a survey of 375 university students for the results of APC, the Kano model, and the direct importance of the quality attributes. The results show that the proposed APC is better than other approaches based on the correlation analysis with the results of direct importance. An analysis of e-leaning’s quality perceptions using the Kano model and suggestions for improving e-learning’s service quality are also included in this study.
Abstract
Determining relative importance among many quality attributes under financial constraints is an important task. The weighted value of an attribute particularly in QFD, will influence on engineering characteristics and this will eventually influence the whole manufacturing process such as parts deployment, process planning, and production planning. Several scholars have suggested weighting formulas using CSC (Customer Satisfaction Coefficient) in the Kano model. However, previous research shows that the validity of the CSC approaches has not been proved systematically. The aim of the present study is to address drawbacks of CSC and to develop APC (Average Potential Coefficient), a new approach for weighting of quality attributes. For this, the current study investigated 33 quality attributes of e-learning and conducted a survey of 375 university students for the results of APC, the Kano model, and the direct importance of the quality attributes. The results show that the proposed APC is better than other approaches based on the correlation analysis with the results of direct importance. An analysis of e-leaning’s quality perceptions using the Kano model and suggestions for improving e-learning’s service quality are also included in this study.
참고문헌 (29)
- Akao, Y., "Quality Function Deployment", Landsberg, ~ (1992)
- Berger, C., "Kano’s methods for understanding customer-defined quality", Center for Quality of Management Journal, 2, pp.2~36 (1993)
- Cadotte, E.R., "Dissatisfiers and Satisfiers : Suggestions from Consumer Complaints and Compliments", Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction, and Complaining Behavior, 1, pp.74~79 (1988)
- Chen, L.H., "Underst- anding e-learning service quality of a commercial bank by using Kano’s model", Total Quality Management, 22(1), pp.99~116 (2011)
- Cook, M.J., "A student's perspective of service quality in education", Total Quality Management, 8(2&3), pp.120~125 (1997)
- Emery, C.R., "Schoolwork as products, professors as customers : a practical teaching approach in business education", Journal of Education for Business, 78, pp.97~102 (2002)
- Fong, D., "Using the self-stated importance questionnaire to interpret Kano questionnaire results", Center for Quality of Management Journal, 5(3), pp.21~23 (1996)
- Garibay, C., "Evaluation of a digital library by means of quality function deployment( QFD) and the Kano model", The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(2), pp.125~132 (2010)
- Hsu, C.H., "Integrating Kano model into quality function deployment to facilitate decision analysis for service quality", International Conference on Mathematics and Computers in Business and Economics (2007)
- Jang, H.Y., "Determination of the relative importance of qulaity attributes in the Kano model", 박사, pp.2013
- 장흥엽, "ASC를 이용한 품질특성의 중요도 결정", 품질경영학회지, 40(4), pp.589~598 (2012), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- Kano, N., "Attractive quality and must-be quality", Hinshitsu, 14, pp.147~156 (1984)
- Kuo, Y.F., "Integrating Kano’s model into web-community service quality", Total Quality Management, 15(7), pp.925~939 (2004)
- Kim, Y.S., "Total Quality Management" (1999), Park-Young-Sa
- Lee, M.C., "Appling the Kano methodology to meet customer requi-rements : NASA’s microgravity science program", Quality Management Journal, 4, pp.95~106 (1997)
- Li, Y.N., "Measuring web-based service quality", Total Quality Management, 13(5), pp.685~700 (2002)
- Matzler, K., "How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano’s model of customer satisfaction into quality function development", Technovation, 18(1), pp.25~38 (1998)
- Parasuraman, A., "A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research", Journal of Marketing, 49(4), pp.41~50 (1985)
- Shen, X.X., "An integrated approach to innovative product development using Kano’s model and QFD", European Journal of Innovation Management, 3(2), pp.91~99 (2000)
- Sireli, Y., "Integration of Kano’s Model Into QFD for Multiple Product Design", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(2), pp.380~390 (2007)
- 송해근, "품질 속성 관리를 위한 B-W 모델의 개발 및 활용에 관한 연구", 박사, 산업공학과 산업공학전공, pp.2013
- 송해근, "품질의 이원론을 이용한 개선의 우선순위 결정", 산업경영시스템학회지, 36(1), pp.70~77 (2013), 한국산업경영시스템학회[DOI]
- 송해근, "Kano 모델의 설문 워딩에 관한 연구", 품질경영학회지, 40(4), pp.453~466 (2012), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- Tan, K.C., "Integrating SERVQUAL and Kano’s model into QFD for service excellence development", Managing Service Quality, 11(6), pp.418~430 (2001)
- Tontini, G., "Integrating the Kano Model and QFD for Designing New Products", TQM and Business Excellence, 18(6), pp.599~612 (2007)
- Vargo, S.L., "Satisfiers, Dissatisfiers, Criticals, and Neutrals : A Review of Their Relative Effects on Customer (Dis) Satisfaction", Academy of Marketing Science Review, 11(2), pp.1~13 (2007)
- Witell, L., "Classification of quality attributes", Managing Service Quality, 17, pp.54~73 (2007)
- Yang, Z., "Services quality dimensions of internet retailing: an exploratory analysis", Journal of Services Marketing, 17(7), pp.685~700 (2003)
- Zhang, P., "User Expectations and Rankings of Quality Factors in Different Web Site Domains", International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(2), pp.9~33 (2002)