Kano 모델의 설문 워딩에 관한 연구
Wordings of the Kano Model’s Questionnaire
1
조회
0
다운로드
29
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The Kano model has been widely accepted as a method for classifying quality attributes for almost three decades since its introduction. However, the wordings of the five alternatives in the Kano's questionnaire has been criticised for unclear and confusable meanings. New wordings of the five alternatives are proposed in this paper. Methods: To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed wordings, we classify 30 quality attributes of smartphones using the conventional wordings and the proposed wordings respectively. The two classification results are compared with the direct classification results by undergraduate students who learned the Kano model. Results: The classification results using the proposed wordings are much more consistent with the direct classification results than those using the conventional wordings. Conclusion: The proposed wordings are less confusable and easy to understand, and thus it results in more consistent with the direct classification.
Abstract
Purpose: The Kano model has been widely accepted as a method for classifying quality attributes for almost three decades since its introduction. However, the wordings of the five alternatives in the Kano's questionnaire has been criticised for unclear and confusable meanings. New wordings of the five alternatives are proposed in this paper. Methods: To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed wordings, we classify 30 quality attributes of smartphones using the conventional wordings and the proposed wordings respectively. The two classification results are compared with the direct classification results by undergraduate students who learned the Kano model. Results: The classification results using the proposed wordings are much more consistent with the direct classification results than those using the conventional wordings. Conclusion: The proposed wordings are less confusable and easy to understand, and thus it results in more consistent with the direct classification.
참고문헌 (23)
- Bartikowski, B., "Customer satisfaction measurement : comparing four methods of attribute categorizations", The Service Industries Journal, 24, pp.67~82 (2004)
- Berger, C., "Kano’s methods for understanding customer-defined quality", Center for Quality of Management Journal, 2, pp.2~36 (1993)
- Chen, J. K., "A new method to identify the category of the quality attribute", Total Quality Management, 20, pp.1139~52 (2009)
- Emery, C. R., "Schoolwork as products, professors as customers : a practical teaching approach in business education", Journal of Education for Business, 78, pp.97~102 (2002)
- 강기두, "Kano모형을 이용한 물류서비스품질의 분류", 품질경영학회지, 37(2), pp.32~45 (2009), 한국품질경영학회
- Kano, N., "Attractive quality and must-be quality", Hinshitsu, 14, pp.147~56 (1984)
- Kim, Yeun-Sung, "Total Quality Management" (1999), Park-Young-Sa
- Lee, M. C., "Appling the Kano methodology to meet customer requirements : NASA’s microgravity science program", Quality Management Journal, 4, pp.95~106 (1997)
- 임정훈, "Kano 모형에 기반한 소비자 요구사항 분류: 퍼지 접근방법", 품질경영학회지, 31(3), pp.98~113 (2003), 한국품질경영학회
- 임성욱, "Kano 모델을 기반으로 한 잠재적 고객만족 개선지수", 품질경영학회지, 38(2), pp.248~260 (2010), 한국품질경영학회
- Löfgren, M., "Two decades of using Kano’s theory of attractive quality: a literature review", Quality Management Journal, 15, pp.59~75 (2008), ASQ
- Matzler, K., "The asymmetric relationship between attribute-level performance and overall customer satisfaction : a reconsideration of the importance-performance analysis", Industrial Marketing Management, 33, pp.271~77 (2004)
- Matzler, K., "Employee satisfaction : does Kano’s model apply", Total Quality Management, 15, pp.1179~98 (2004)
- Mikulic, J., "A critical review of techniques for classifying quality attributes in the Kano model", Managing Service Quality, 21, pp.46~66 (2011)
- Mittal, V., "The asymmetric impact of negative and positive attribute-level performance on overall satisfaction and repurchase intentions", Journal of Marketing, 62, pp.33~47 (1998)
- Nilsson-Witell, L., "Dynamics of service attributes : A test of Kano’s theory of quality", International Journal of Service Industry Management, 16, pp.152~68 (2005)
- Oliver, R. L., "Customer Delight : Foundations, Findings and Managerial Insight", Journal of Retailing, 73, pp.311~36 (1997)
- 신아름, "Kano 모델을 기반으로 총체적 고객만족계수의 개발에 관한 연구", 산업공학(IE interfaces), 20(4), pp.479~487 (2007), 대한산업공학회
- A B-W model for managing quality attributes, "Song, Hae-Geun", Managing Service Quality, ~ (2012)
- Improving your measurement of customer satisfaction: a guide to creating, conducting, analysing and reporting customer satisfaction measurement program, "Vavra, T. G.", ASQC Quality Press Milwaukee, ~ (1997)
- Witell, L., "Classification of quality attributes", Managing Service Quality, 17, pp.54~73 (2007)
- Witell, Lars, "Guest editorial : Setting a research agenda for the theory of attractive quality", The TQM Journal, 2, pp.3~ (2011)
- 윤재욱, "Kano 품질속성 평가방법론들의 실증적 비교분석", 품질경영학회지, 37(4), pp.31~42 (2009), 한국품질경영학회