피의사실공표의 형법적 정당화에서 민사판결 법리 원용의 불합리성
The Irrationality of the Use of the Civil Judgment in the Criminal Justification of Public Announcement of the Suspected Crime
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper critically analyzes the purpose of the Supreme Court’s civil judgment, which is being used in reviewing the reasons for illegality in Article 126 of the public announcement of criminal law in many papers, from a criminal law perspective. Through this review, I would like to point out that the purpose of this civil judgment is that it cannot be used in judging the grounds for the criminal offense of prosecution. Although the Korean Penal Code states that it is not possible to publicize the facts of the crime until the lawsuit was filed against the person concerned, the provision has not been applied and forgotten in the past 60years. However, in recent years, there has been a move towards the active application of this regulation. At this point, the indiscriminate use of civil judgments only makes the application difficult for the active application of Article 126 of the Criminal Code.
Abstract
This paper critically analyzes the purpose of the Supreme Court’s civil judgment, which is being used in reviewing the reasons for illegality in Article 126 of the public announcement of criminal law in many papers, from a criminal law perspective. Through this review, I would like to point out that the purpose of this civil judgment is that it cannot be used in judging the grounds for the criminal offense of prosecution. Although the Korean Penal Code states that it is not possible to publicize the facts of the crime until the lawsuit was filed against the person concerned, the provision has not been applied and forgotten in the past 60years. However, in recent years, there has been a move towards the active application of this regulation. At this point, the indiscriminate use of civil judgments only makes the application difficult for the active application of Article 126 of the Criminal Code.
참고문헌 (13)
- 2018 언론관련판결 분석보고서, 제2부 언론 관련 판결 사례, "언론중재위원회", ~ (2019)
- 김봉수, "피의사실공표의 허용한계에 관한 형법적 고찰, In 미디어와 인권, 그리고 형사법", 제8회 한국형사학대회(5개학회연합학술대회) (2019)
- 김성돈, "한국 형법의 사회상규조항의 기능과 형법학의 과제", 성균관법학, 24(4), pp.247~285 (2012), 법학연구원[DOI]
- 김성돈, "한국 형법의 사회상규조항의 계보와 그 입법적 의의", 형사법연구, 24(4), pp.3~45 (2012), 한국형사법학회[DOI]
- 서아람, "수사기관의 피의사실공표 ― 피의사실공표죄와 처벌의 당위성을 중심으로", 우리법연구회 논문집, 7 (2018)
- 이원석, "알 권리와 피의사실공표죄의 관계", 해외연수검사연구논문집, 21(2) (2006), 법무연수원
- 연합뉴스, "허광무 기자 피의사실공표 경찰관 수사 여부, 대검 수사심의위서 결론", ~ (2019)
- 박태인, "피의사실공표죄 노건평도 피해자 … “법원 판단 받아봐야 한다”", 중앙일보, ~ (2019)
- 박범준, "피의사실공표죄 불똥 튈라 … 사건공개 몸 사리는 인천검경", 인천일보, ~ (2019)
- 이윤희, "김성태 측 “딸 관련 보도 중 검찰 관계자 인용만 500건”", 뉴시스, ~ (2019)
- 김원철, "민주당, 검찰에 불만 쏟아내 … “피의사실 공표는 적폐행위”", 한겨레, ~ (2019)
- 윤다정, "“입도 뻥긋 마라” … 조국 수사 ‘깜깜이’ 되나", 뉴스1, ~ (2019)
- 김도원, "靑 “윤석열 총장, 검찰 피의사실 공표 수사해야”", YTN, ~ (2019)