수사공보준칙과 피의사실공표죄
Prosecutor’s Investigation Bulletin and Crime of Publication of Criminal Facts under Investigation
0
조회
0
다운로드
19
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Department of Justice has enacted in 2010 “the prosecutor’s investigation bulletin for the human rights.” However, even after enforcement of bulletin prosecutors frequently disclose the alleged facts and circumstances of the investigation without observing the procedures and formats of investigation bulletin, because investigation of violations against the bulletin and discipline for violations did not work. Furthermore, investigation and prosecution for the violations did not proceed. After the regulations have been enforced five years ago, it suggests that we must find out the improvement for effectiveness of bulletin and vitality of the article 126 Korean Criminal Act. We should consider the following issues on compromising two contradicting values, the right to personality and the right to know: Can the bulletin be justified against the crime of publication of criminal facts under Article 126 of the Korean Criminal Act; If the bulletin can be justified, what are the requirements for justification of the bulletin. In order to justify the publication of criminal facts a legal basis for the bulletin should be established. Based on the legal basis for the bulletin, following should be determined: whether publication of criminal facts are allowed and if so, which criminal facts are included.
Abstract
Department of Justice has enacted in 2010 “the prosecutor’s investigation bulletin for the human rights.” However, even after enforcement of bulletin prosecutors frequently disclose the alleged facts and circumstances of the investigation without observing the procedures and formats of investigation bulletin, because investigation of violations against the bulletin and discipline for violations did not work. Furthermore, investigation and prosecution for the violations did not proceed. After the regulations have been enforced five years ago, it suggests that we must find out the improvement for effectiveness of bulletin and vitality of the article 126 Korean Criminal Act. We should consider the following issues on compromising two contradicting values, the right to personality and the right to know: Can the bulletin be justified against the crime of publication of criminal facts under Article 126 of the Korean Criminal Act; If the bulletin can be justified, what are the requirements for justification of the bulletin. In order to justify the publication of criminal facts a legal basis for the bulletin should be established. Based on the legal basis for the bulletin, following should be determined: whether publication of criminal facts are allowed and if so, which criminal facts are included.
참고문헌 (20)
- 유기천, "형법학(각론강의)" (1982)
- 이재상, "형법각론(제8판)" (2012)
- 이회창, "주석 형법각칙" (1992), 한국사법행정학회
- 배종대, "신형사소송법(제3판)" (2011)
- 형사정책연구원, "형법제정자료집" (1990), 형사정책연구원
- 김봉수, "피의사실공표죄(형법 제126조)의 규범적 한계에 관한 고찰 - 형법 제126조의 사문화 현상에 대한 원인분석과 해결방안을 중심으로-", 경찰법연구, 9(1), pp.55~78 (2011), 한국경찰법학회
- 김상겸, "피의사실공표의 허용범위와 한계", 형사법의 신동향, (27), pp.1~23 (2010), 대검찰청[DOI]
- 김재윤, "피의사실 공표죄 관련 법적 쟁점 고찰", 언론중재, (가을) (2010)
- 문봉규, "피의사실공표죄의 형사법적 한계와 허용범위", 외법논집, 35(1), pp.167~179 (2011), 법학연구소
- 문재완, "피의사실공표죄의 헌법적 검토", 세계헌법연구, 20(3), pp.1~27 (2014), 세계헌법학회한국학회
- 박혜진, "형법적 시각에서 본 피의사실공표죄의 제문제", 비교형사법연구, 13(2), pp.159~183 (2011), 한국비교형사법학회
- 심석태, "피의사실공표죄의 의의와 실효성 및 개선 방향", 법무부 주최 인권의 날 기념 국제심포지엄 (2013)
- 안성수, "피의사실 공표죄의 적용과 한계", 인권과정의, (396) (2009)
- 이근우, "중간수사발표에 대한 피의사실공표죄 적용의 몇 가지 쟁점", 비교형사법연구, 10(1), pp.253~272 (2008), 한국비교형사법학회
- 이원석, "알권리와 피의사실공표죄의 관계", 해외파견검사연구논문집, 21(2) (2006), 법무연수원
- 주승희, "피의사실공표죄의 법적 쟁점 검토 -공개수배 및 검찰수사공보의 정당성 요건을 중심으로-", 고려법학, (63), pp.151~183 (2011), 법학연구원
- 하태훈, "공정한 재판의 원칙과 보도의 자유", 형사법연구, 6 (1993)
- 하태훈, "매스컴을 이용한 피의자(내지 용의자) 공개수배의 형사소송법적 문제점과 개선방안", 안암법학, 11 (2000)
- 하태훈, "검찰권 통제 및 검찰제도 개혁 방안", 법과사회, (37), pp.91~112 (2009), 법과사회이론학회
- 한위수, "피의사실공표죄의 적용과 한계", 신문과방송 (2009)