위치추적 전자장치 부착명령의 위헌성 유무
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study has considered on basis of constitutionality that the attachment order of electronic device for tracking location doesn't violate the principle of prohibition against double jeopardy,over-prohibition, and rights to equality. The attachment order of electronic device for tracking location doesn't violate the principle of prohibition against double jeopardy because it is a security measure to restrict freedom without imprisonment. However double assessment of second conviction dangerousness at additional punishment to repeated offense and sentence of the attachment order of electronic device for tracking location could be raised objection of double jeopardy. A sex offence has a character that second conviction dangerousness and crime victimization are serious. Thus to release sex offenders is very dangerous, and protection of victims and social defence are necessary. Therefore the attachment order of electronic device for tracking location doesn't violate the principle of over-prohibition because there is a balance between human rights violation and public interest. The attachment order of electronic device for tracking location is applied special offences, but it doesn't violate the principle of rights to equality because of a sanction to character of sex offenders.
Abstract
This study has considered on basis of constitutionality that the attachment order of electronic device for tracking location doesn't violate the principle of prohibition against double jeopardy,over-prohibition, and rights to equality. The attachment order of electronic device for tracking location doesn't violate the principle of prohibition against double jeopardy because it is a security measure to restrict freedom without imprisonment. However double assessment of second conviction dangerousness at additional punishment to repeated offense and sentence of the attachment order of electronic device for tracking location could be raised objection of double jeopardy. A sex offence has a character that second conviction dangerousness and crime victimization are serious. Thus to release sex offenders is very dangerous, and protection of victims and social defence are necessary. Therefore the attachment order of electronic device for tracking location doesn't violate the principle of over-prohibition because there is a balance between human rights violation and public interest. The attachment order of electronic device for tracking location is applied special offences, but it doesn't violate the principle of rights to equality because of a sanction to character of sex offenders.
참고문헌 (37)
- 강은영, "아동 실종 및 유괴범죄의 실태와 대책" (2009), 한국형사정책연구원
- 고시면, "사회보호법의 폐지와 치료감호법의 시행에 따른 헌법재판소 결정의 회고", 사법행정 (2006)
- 권희경, "성폭력 장기후유증 척도의 타당화 연구: 중·고·대학생 및 대학원생들을 중심으로", 한국심리학회지:여성, 8(3), pp.15~33 (2003), 한국여성심리학회
- 권희경, "청소년 성피해자들의 성폭력 인식과자기손해적 성행동", 한국심리학회지:여성, 8(1), pp.35~47 (2003), 한국여성심리학회
- 김성돈, "형법총론" (2009), 성균관대학교출판부
- 김재중, "한국의 전자감시제도 및 그 발전방안", 법학연구, 18(1) (2007), 충북대학교 법학연구소
- 김혜정, "성폭력범죄자에 대한 전자팔찌 적용가능성에 관한 검토: ‘특정성폭력범죄자에대한위치추적전자장치부착에관한 법률안’을 중심으로", 형사정책연구, 16(3), pp.239~266 (2005), 한국형사정책연구원
- 김혜정, "독일의 최근 동향을 통해 바라본 우리 보안처분제도의 재조명", 법조, 57(10), pp.89~116 (2008), 법조협회
- 김혜정, "보안처분제도의 개선방안", 형사법연구, (22) (2004)
- 김호기, "전통적 책임주의에 대한 현대적 도전 - 특정 성범죄자에 대한 위치추적 전자장치 부착제도 도입이 가지는 의미 -", 형사법연구, 21(1), pp.199~222 (2009), 한국형사법학회
- 문정민, "성범죄자 전자감시제도에 대한 고찰", 법학연구, (29), pp.221~241 (2008), 한국법학회
- 박상기, "형법총론" (2009), 박영사
- 박지현, "보안관찰법에 관한 기본권 해석", 법학논총, 24(3), pp.431~446 (2007), 법학연구소
- 박혜진, "소위 전자장치부착법(특정 성범죄자에 대한 위치추적 전자장치 부착에 관한 법률)에 대한 비판적 고찰", 형사정책, 20(2), pp.225~251 (2008), 한국형사정책학회
- 배종대, "형법총론" (2008), 홍문사
- 신동운, "형법총론" (2008), 법문사
- 심정희, "사회보호법 폐지 관련쟁점 및 논의과정", 국회보, 통권 : 466 (2005)
- 오영근, "“특정 성폭력범죄자에 대한 위치추적 전자장치 부착에 관한 법률에 의한 전자감시제도의 법적 성격 및 그 위헌성 유무”, 한국고시(2009. 11. 5)", ~ (2009)
- 오영근, "형법총론" (2009), 박영사
- 윤영철, "우리나라 전자감시제도에 대한 비판적 소고: 특정 성폭력범죄자에 대한 위치추적 전자장치 부착에 관한 법률을 중심으로", 형사정책연구, 19(3), pp.201~228 (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이수정, "성범죄 재범율에 관한 바른 이해와 재범 방지 대안 모색", 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 19(3), pp.83~99 (2005), 한국사회및성격심리학회
- 이재상, "신형사소송법" (2009), 박영사
- 임웅, "형법총론" (2009), 법문사
- 장석헌, "아동대상 성폭력범죄의 형사사법적 대응방안", 한국경찰학회보, 11(2), pp.231~260 (2009), 한국경찰학회
- 정신교, "특정성범죄자 전자감시제도에 대한 쟁점", 형사정책, 20(2), pp.279~299 (2008), 한국형사정책학회
- 정현미, "성폭력범죄대책과 전자감시: 특정 범죄자에 대한 위치추적전자장치부착에 관한 법률”의 검토를 중심으로", 형사정책, 21(1), pp.321~349 (2009), 한국형사정책학회
- 허경미, "지역사회교정 관점의 전자감시제의 한계 및 개선방향", 矯正硏究, 42, pp.75~107 (2009), 한국교정학회
- 허영, "한국헌법론" (2009), 박영사
- Bagley, Christopher, "Sexual Assault in School, Mental Health and Suicidal Behaviors in Adolescent Women in Canada", Adolescence, 32 (1997)
- Burrell, William D., "From B. F. Skinner to Spiderman to Martha Stewart: The Past, Present and Future of Electronic Monitoring of Offenders", Probation and Parole: Current Issues (2008)
- Hanson, R. Karl, "The Characteristics of Persistent Sexual Offenders", Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6) (2005)
- Hanson, R. Karl, "Predicting Relapse: A Meta-Anaysis of Sexual Offender Recidivism Studies", Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(2) (1998)
- Hanson, R. Karl, "Long-Term Recidivism of Child Molesters", Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(4) (1993)
- Kubic, Elizabeth K., "Adolescent Females Who Have Sexually Offended", Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 11(3) (2002)
- Nunes, Kevin L., "Denial Predicts Recidivism for Some Sexual Offenders", Sex Abuse, 19 (2007)
- Porter, Stephen, "Characteristics of Sexual Homicides Committed by Psychopathic and Nonpsychopathic Offenders", Law and Human Behavior, 27(5) (2003)
- Prentky, Robert A., "Recidivism Rates Among Child Molesters and Rapists", Law and Human Behavior, 21(6) (1997)