미필적 고의에 관한 약간의 고찰
Some Considerations on Dolus Eventualis
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this article the author tries to find an element in dolus eventualis case that makes it a crime with criminal intent, not of negligence. For that purpose he analyzes mens rea, the subjective element of crime, and tries to compare the theories of dolus available in korean criminal law scholarship. Korean criminal law does not have any category similar to ‘recklessness’ in anglo-american law, so the cases subsumed by that category should be classified as either crime with intent or negligence. The author insists after some theoretical investigation on the themes around the criminal intent that the essential element in the dolus eventualis cases the criminal’s attitude of taking result seriouly during committing a crime. So if a criminal took the result seriouly, which at last occurred after her performing some activity, the result can be regarded as committed with criminal intent.
Abstract
In this article the author tries to find an element in dolus eventualis case that makes it a crime with criminal intent, not of negligence. For that purpose he analyzes mens rea, the subjective element of crime, and tries to compare the theories of dolus available in korean criminal law scholarship. Korean criminal law does not have any category similar to ‘recklessness’ in anglo-american law, so the cases subsumed by that category should be classified as either crime with intent or negligence. The author insists after some theoretical investigation on the themes around the criminal intent that the essential element in the dolus eventualis cases the criminal’s attitude of taking result seriouly during committing a crime. So if a criminal took the result seriouly, which at last occurred after her performing some activity, the result can be regarded as committed with criminal intent.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김성돈, "형법총론 제3판" (2014), 성균관대학교 출판부
- 배종대, "형법총론 제11판" (2014), 홍문사
- 신동운, "형법총론 제8판" (2014), 법문사
- 이재상, "형법연습 제8판" (2012), 신조사
- 이재상, "형법총론 제7판" (2012), 박영사
- 임웅, "형법총론 제4정판" (2012), 법문사
- 정성근, "형법총론" (2012), 성균관대학교 출판부
- 정영일, , pp.121~ (2013), 도서출판 학림
- 문채규, "미필적 고의", 안동대학 논문집, 11 (1989)
- 김용욱, "미필적 고의와 과실의 구분에 관한 연구", 비교형사법연구, 3(2) (2001)
- Baumann-Weber-Mitsch, "Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil, 10판" (1995)
- Engisch, Karl, "Untersuchungen über Vorsatz und Fahrlässigkeit" (1930)
- Frisch, Wolfgang, "Vorsatz und Risiko" (1983)
- Henrich, Dieter, "Between Kant and Hegel" (2003)
- von Hippel, Robert, "Die Grenze von Vorsatz und Fahrlässigkeit" (1903)
- Maurach-Zipf, "Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil, Teilband 1, 8판" (1992)
- Mayer, Max Ernst, "Der Allgemeiner Teil des deustchen Strafrechts. Lehrbuch" (1923)
- Stratenwerth, "Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil I, 4판" (2000)
- Tröndle-Fischer, "Strafgesetzbuch, 49판" (1999)
- Frank, Reinhard, "Vorstellung und Wille in der modernen Doluslehre, ZStW Bd. 10" (1890)
- Kaufmann, Armin, "Der dolus eventualis im Deliktsaufbar, Strafrechtdogmatik zwischen Sein und Wert", ~ (1982)
- Kindhäuser, Urs, "Der Vorsatz als Zurechnungskriterium", ZStW, 96 (1984)
- Schröder, Horst, "Aufbau und Grenzen des Vorsatzbegriffs" (1949), Sauer-Festschrift
- Weigend, Thomas, "Zwischen Vorsatz und Fahrlässigkeit", ZStW, ~ (1981)
- Wolff, Ernst Amadeus, "Die Grenze des dolus eventualis und der willentlichen Verletzung" (1973), Gallas-Festschrift