오픈퀄리티 품질성과지표(QSC)의 중요도 분석 연구
A Study on the Relative Importance of Quality Scorecard(QSC) for Open Quality
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to study the relative weights of Quality Scorecard (QSC) which was developed for a new quality concept, called Open Quality, in the era of Industry 4.0. Open Quality aims to ensure quality responsibility by accurately measuring the quality level and sharing the quality data with stakeholders. Methods: To analyze the importance of QSC, a survey study was conducted based on 10 types of industry. The relative weights of QSC measures are investigated by both the industry types and the organizational life cycle. Further, the relative importance of QSC was analyzed according to the organization’s lifecycle. By dividing the aspects with respect to the result data, application method for QSC is further provided. Results: The result indicates that there are significant differences among Korean companies in terms of the level of Industry revolution stages. Among ten industry types, manufacturing and finance sectors show the highest importance of QSC. QSC measures are also considered more importance in growth stage of the maturity cycle than generator and decline stages. Conclusion: When QSC is adopted for Open Quality, its relative weights must be considered to cope with the unique characteristics of industrial types. Besides, QSC's contribution may vary according to the level of maturity of the target company.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to study the relative weights of Quality Scorecard (QSC) which was developed for a new quality concept, called Open Quality, in the era of Industry 4.0. Open Quality aims to ensure quality responsibility by accurately measuring the quality level and sharing the quality data with stakeholders. Methods: To analyze the importance of QSC, a survey study was conducted based on 10 types of industry. The relative weights of QSC measures are investigated by both the industry types and the organizational life cycle. Further, the relative importance of QSC was analyzed according to the organization’s lifecycle. By dividing the aspects with respect to the result data, application method for QSC is further provided. Results: The result indicates that there are significant differences among Korean companies in terms of the level of Industry revolution stages. Among ten industry types, manufacturing and finance sectors show the highest importance of QSC. QSC measures are also considered more importance in growth stage of the maturity cycle than generator and decline stages. Conclusion: When QSC is adopted for Open Quality, its relative weights must be considered to cope with the unique characteristics of industrial types. Besides, QSC's contribution may vary according to the level of maturity of the target company.
참고문헌 (28)
- Akter, S., "Big Data Analytics in E-commerce : A Systematic Rreview and Agenda for Future Research", Electronic Markets, 26(2), pp.173~194 (2016)
- Banerjee, S, "Corporate Social Responsibility and Product Quality : Complements or Substitutes?", International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32(3), pp.734~745 (2017)
- Campanella, J., "Principles of Quality Costs, Principles, Implementation, and Use" (1999), ASQ Quality Press
- Chesbrough, H. W, "The Era of Open Innovation", Managing Innovation and Change, 127(3), pp.34~41 (2006)
- 조철희, "경영시스템 도입 중소기업의 품질이행율 향상을 위한 품질기록 관리운영의 표준화 사례연구", 품질경영학회지, 47(4), pp.911~926 (2019), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- 정혜란, "4차 산업혁명시대의 스마트 팩토리 구축을 위한 품질전략", 품질경영학회지, 48(1), pp.87~105 (2020), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- Crnjac, M., "From Concept to the Introduction of Industry 4.0", International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 8(21), pp.21~30 (2017)
- Dahlgaard, J. J., "Quality Costs and Total Quality Management", Total Quality Management, 3(3), pp.211~222 (1992)
- Durana, P., "Quality Culture of Manufacturing Enterprises : A possible way to adaptation to Industry 4. 0", Social Sciences, 8(4), pp.124~ (2019)
- Feng, S. C., "Toward Knowledge Management for Smart Manufacturing", Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 17(3), pp.031016~ (2017)
- Foidl, H., "Research challenges of Industry 4.0 for quality management", International Conference on Enterprises Resource Planning Systems, pp.121~137 (2015), Springer
- 하석광, "품질경영활동이 경영성과에 미치는 영향 - 조직마음챙김지원에 의해 조절된 혁신문화의 매개효과 -", 품질경영학회지, 47(4), pp.667~685 (2019), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- Illes, B., "Solid State Phenomena, 261", pp.481~489 (2017), Trans Tech Publications Ltd
- Johnson, M. A, "The Development of Measures of the Cost of Quality for an Engineering Unit", International Journal of Qualiity & Reliability Management, 12(2), pp.86~100 (1995)
- Kaplan, R. S., "The Balanced Scorecard and Measures that Drive Performance", Harvard Business Review, pp.71~90 (1992)
- Li, Z., "Toward Open Manufacturing", Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(1), pp.303~320 (2018)
- Park, S. H., "Assessing a Social Responsibility Model for Sustainable Company Growth in the Fourth Industrial Revolution", International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 11(3), pp.334~345 (2019)
- Park, S. H., "Building a New Culture for Quality and Innovation in the Era of the 4th Industrial Revolution", Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(9-10), pp.934~945 (2017)
- 이상복, "4차산업혁명시대의 한국품질경영 제안", 품질경영학회지, 45(4), pp.739~760 (2017), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- Roller, M. R, "A Quality Approach to Qualitative Content Analysis : Similarities and Differences Compared to Other Qualitative Methods", Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 2019, pp.20(3), 1~21
- Sader, S. S., "Suggested Indicators to Measure the Impact of Industry 4.0 on Total Quality Management", Industry 4.0, 2(6), pp.298~301 (2017)
- Sader, S., "Industry 4.0 as a Key Enabler toward Successful Implementation of Total Quality Management Practices", Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 27(2), pp.131~140 (2019)
- Sang M. Lee, "The Quality Managmeent Ecosystem for Predictive Maintenance in the Industry 4. 0 Era", International Journal of Quality Innovation, 1, pp.1~11 (2019)
- Shin, W. S., "Korean Quality-Past Present and Future", Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27(7-8), pp.703~717 (2016)
- Shin, W. S., "A Quality Scorecard for the Era of Industry 4.0", Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 29(9-10), pp.959~976 (2018)
- Sun, H., "Functional Quantitative and Qualitative Models for Quality Modeling in a Fused Deposition Modelling Process", IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 15(1), pp.393~403 (2017)
- Wood, D. C., "Principles of Quality Costs" (2013), ASQ Quality Press
- Zaidin, N. H. M., "Quality Management in Industry 4. 0 Era", Journal of Management and Science, 8(2), pp.82~91 (2018)