4차 산업혁명시대의 품질경영
Quality Management on the 4th Industrial Revolution
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The world faces a great turning point fundamentally rebuilding the future, and human lives, by embracing the 4th industrial revolution era. This paper aims to seek new and various business models in the 4th industrial revolution era, and to examine the evolution of quality management in the changing of the industrial ecosystem. Methods: This paper examines the various strategies of approaching the 4th industrial revolution in Germany, the USA, Japan, China, and Korea. This paper also draws detailed items by classifying the six major items of Malcolm Baldridge into large, medium, and small scale classifications, researches items from the technical perspective by applied fields, and the four major factor perspectives of quality management, as well as analyzes the relevant items in a multidimensional method. After a questionnaire survey targeting 200 quality experts was conducted, the important quality management factors were selected by applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Results: The importance of the general criteria was analyzed in the order of customers, MAKM (measurement, analysis, and knowledge management), workforce, strategy, operations, and leadership. As for the importance analysis results of the secondary subcriteria, the following items are highly analyzed: senior leadership, searching business model’s innovation opportunity, customer satisfaction improvement, big data utilization, systematic management of workforce, and, planning and design quality. Conclusion: In the era of the Internet of everything, when complexity increases, this study presented a quality management direction suitable for new business methods challenging existing orders by drawing on quality management priorities.
Abstract
Purpose: The world faces a great turning point fundamentally rebuilding the future, and human lives, by embracing the 4th industrial revolution era. This paper aims to seek new and various business models in the 4th industrial revolution era, and to examine the evolution of quality management in the changing of the industrial ecosystem. Methods: This paper examines the various strategies of approaching the 4th industrial revolution in Germany, the USA, Japan, China, and Korea. This paper also draws detailed items by classifying the six major items of Malcolm Baldridge into large, medium, and small scale classifications, researches items from the technical perspective by applied fields, and the four major factor perspectives of quality management, as well as analyzes the relevant items in a multidimensional method. After a questionnaire survey targeting 200 quality experts was conducted, the important quality management factors were selected by applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Results: The importance of the general criteria was analyzed in the order of customers, MAKM (measurement, analysis, and knowledge management), workforce, strategy, operations, and leadership. As for the importance analysis results of the secondary subcriteria, the following items are highly analyzed: senior leadership, searching business model’s innovation opportunity, customer satisfaction improvement, big data utilization, systematic management of workforce, and, planning and design quality. Conclusion: In the era of the Internet of everything, when complexity increases, this study presented a quality management direction suitable for new business methods challenging existing orders by drawing on quality management priorities.
참고문헌 (20)
- 조진호, "최고경영자의 리더십이 건설품질경영활동과 건설품질경영성과에 관한 실증연구", 품질경영학회지, 45(3), pp.403~426 (2017), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- Diagnosis and scenarios of the hyper-connected society based on the viewpoint of all things intelligence internet, "Choi, M. S.", ETRI, ~ (2013)
- "Creative Economy and Innovation Center" (2015)[URL]
- 하원규, "디지털 행성시대의 메가트렌드와 창조국가전략", 국정관리연구, 10(2), pp.37~66 (2015), 성균관대학교 국정관리대학원
- Ha, W. K., "The 4th industrial revolution" (2015), Kontencheuhada
- Ha, W. K., "Super it korea 2030" (2011), Electronicnews
- Harari, Y. N., "Sapiens" (2015), Kimyoungsa
- Jung, M., "Weekly economic review", Hyundai research institute, 705(16), pp.1~16 (2016)
- Kim, I. S., "The 4th Industrial revolution, New wave of the future" (2016), Hoitebooks
- 2016 Davos report, "Kim, J. U.", Maeil business news korea, ~ (2016)
- 김윤주, "가중치 추출 기법의 비교: AHP, JA, Swing기법을 중심으로", 국가정책연구, 21(1), pp.5~33 (2007), 국가정책연구소
- Klaus, S., "The fourth industrial revolution" (2016), Saelounhyeonjae
- Lee, M. H., "The fourth industrial revolution", Korea creative economy news, ~ (2016)
- Moon, K. H., "A comparison of the industrial revolution in britain and korea", master, pp.2014
- "Promotion of manufacturing industry revolution 3.0 strategy" (2014)[URL]
- 현영준, "국가의 문화차원이 품질경영 성숙도 수준과 프로젝트 품질에 미치는 영향: ITER 프로젝트를 중심으로", 품질경영학회지, 45(2), pp.247~260 (2017), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- Saaty, T. L, "How to make a decision: An analytic hierarchy process", Interfaces, 24(6), pp.19~43 (1994)
- Song, S. S, "The historical development of the industrial revolution and the status of the fourth industrial revolution", Korean association of science and technology studies, pp.1~18 (2017)
- "S&T GPS" (2015)[URL]
- "Hyper-connected society and our level. Issue and analysis, No. 129" (2014)[URL]
