본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

4차 산업혁명 시대의 CMMI 품질성과관리 연구

The Quality Performance Management of CMMI in the Era of Industry 4.0

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Purpose: CMMI is a process model used to assess or improve an organization's software development capabilities. This paper deals with the quality indicators when using CMMI and their priorities for possible improvement. Methods: The 22 process areas and 167 practices of CMMI are matched with 60 indicators of Quality Scorecard(QSC) first to analyze the balance of CMMI in terms of prevention, appraisal, and final result categories and second to isolate a set of key areas for quality focused performance measures. Results: A total of 86.2% (144 out of 167) CMMI practices were mapped to QSC. According to the CMMI level of maturity, level 2 and 3 accounted for more than 75% of the total. The practices at the maturity level of 4 and 5 were mapped to more than 52% of the final result's measurements. It has been observed that CMMI practices need further elaboration at higher levels to consider prevention, appraisal, and final results simultaneously. Conclusion: In order to improve the quality performance of the organization by applying CMMI, the final result measures should be refined in metrics, cycles, and methods, and then corrective actions could be conducted to improve the performance of CMMI practices. This strategy would help the practitioners benefit from CMMI in fostering the overall quality level of key activities for the organization's business goals.

Abstract

Purpose: CMMI is a process model used to assess or improve an organization's software development capabilities. This paper deals with the quality indicators when using CMMI and their priorities for possible improvement. Methods: The 22 process areas and 167 practices of CMMI are matched with 60 indicators of Quality Scorecard(QSC) first to analyze the balance of CMMI in terms of prevention, appraisal, and final result categories and second to isolate a set of key areas for quality focused performance measures. Results: A total of 86.2% (144 out of 167) CMMI practices were mapped to QSC. According to the CMMI level of maturity, level 2 and 3 accounted for more than 75% of the total. The practices at the maturity level of 4 and 5 were mapped to more than 52% of the final result's measurements. It has been observed that CMMI practices need further elaboration at higher levels to consider prevention, appraisal, and final results simultaneously. Conclusion: In order to improve the quality performance of the organization by applying CMMI, the final result measures should be refined in metrics, cycles, and methods, and then corrective actions could be conducted to improve the performance of CMMI practices. This strategy would help the practitioners benefit from CMMI in fostering the overall quality level of key activities for the organization's business goals.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 정혜란, "4차 산업혁명시대의 품질경영", 품질경영학회지, 45(4), pp.629~648 (2017), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
  2. 정규석, "핵심성과지표 개발 방법 비교연구", 품질경영학회지, 46(4), pp.863~876 (2018), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
  3. "CMMI Benefits and Who Uses CMMI Presentation 2015" (2018)[URL]
  4. "Maturity-Profile-31-December-2017" (2018)[URL]
  5. Cooper, Robin, "Activity-based systems: Measuring the costs of resource usage", Accounting horizons, 6(3), pp.1~13 (1992)
  6. Dahlgaard, Jens J., "Quality costs and total quality management", Total Quality Management, 3(3), pp.211~222 (1992)
  7. Demonstrating the Impact and Benefits of CMMI, "Dennis R. Goldenson", ~, pp.CMU (2003), SEI-2003-SR-009
  8. Feigenbaum, Armand V, "Total quality-control", Harvard business review, 34(6), pp.93~101 (1956)
  9. Hatry, Harry P., "Performance measurement principles and techniques: An overview for local government", Public Productivity Review, pp.312~339 (1980)
  10. Hyun Park, Sung, "Building a new culture for quality management in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution", Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(9-10), pp.934~945 (2017)
  11. Value for Money Review of Performance Measurement, Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General on Highlands and Islands Enterprise, "John Bourn, NAO", 18~23 (1997)
  12. Kanji, Gopal K., "Kanji’s business scorecard", Total Quality Management, 13(1), pp.13~27 (2002)
  13. Kaplan, R. S., "Putting the balanced scorecard to work", Harvard Business Review, 71(5), pp.134~140 (1993)
  14. Kulpa, Margaret K., "Interpreting the CMMI (R): A Process Improvement Approach" (2003), Auerbach Publications
  15. Lee Min-Hwa, "AI and the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the nature of AI Revolution", KOREA INSTITUTE OF BRAIN SCIENCE BRAIN, 57, pp.14~16 (2016)
  16. 이민재, "CMMI 성숙도 2단계 GP와 SP간 상호 연관성 분석 및 적용 효율성 검증", 정보과학회논문지 : 소프트웨어 및 응용, 37(6), pp.480~485 (2010), 한국정보과학회
  17. Lee, Min-Jae, "CMMI for Development Manual" (2013), Hantee MEDIA Press
  18. Meidan, Ayman, "Measuring Software Process: A Systematic Mapping Study", ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 51(3), pp.58~ (2018)
  19. Montagud, Sonia, "A systematic review of quality attributes and measures for software product lines", Software Quality Journal, 20(3-4), pp.425~486 (2012)
  20. Öztayşi, Başar, "Handbook of Research on Novel Soft Computing Intelligent Algorithms: Theory and Practical Applications", pp.385~413 (2014), IGI Global
  21. Park, Young-Taek, "The Theory of Quality Management" (2014), KOREA STANDARDS ASSOCIATION MEDIA Press
  22. 이상복, "4차산업혁명시대의 한국품질경영 제안", 품질경영학회지, 45(4), pp.739~760 (2017), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
  23. 이상복, "한국의 품질인 및 품질부서 역할 제안", 품질경영학회지, 46(4), pp.785~796 (2018), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
  24. Roh, Hae-Young, "A study on improvements of SPICE through comparison analysis with performance measurement model QSC", Master
  25. Shin, Wan Seon, "A Quality Scorecard for the era of Industry 4.0", Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, pp.1~18 (2018)
  26. Shin, Wan Seon, "Open Quality for the Era of Industry 4.0: Concept, Methodology and Application", the 17th China-Korea Quality Symposium, (10-12), pp.B-3-1~ (2018)
  27. 신완선, "융복합제품을 위한 모듈방식의 안전인증체계 설계 -자율주행 자동차를 중심으로-", 품질경영학회지, 46(4), pp.1001~1014 (2018), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
  28. Striteska, Michaela, "Review and comparison of performance measurement systems", Journal of Organizational Management Studies, 2012, pp.1~ (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)