본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The effects of direct and indirect government policies on technology entrepreneurship considering national cultural context

박경민|송창현|최인철|김연배|이정민
한국혁신학회|2019.02|한국혁신학회지 (Innovation studies)|제14권 제1호|pp. 33-59|DOI https://doi.org/10.46251/INNOS.2019.02.14.1.33

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

national cultureuncertainty avoidancepublic policiestechnology entrepreneurship

초록

This study covers the role of government policies and national culture in shaping of technology entrepreneurship. First, the study empirically test if government policies are effective to foster technology entrepreneurship using unbalanced panel data set of selected countries covering 7 years. Second, the government policies are divided into direct and indirect policies to compare the differences. Third, the moderating role of uncertainty avoidance (one of national culture) on the relationship between the government policies and technology entrepreneurship is identified. The results showed that two different indirect and direct government policies give different impacts on technology entrepreneurial activity level, and the uncertainty avoidance moderates the effects of the public policies. The results imply that appropriate combination of the two different policies should be selected considering not only the overall differential impacts but also their country-specific cultural context.

Abstract

This study covers the role of government policies and national culture in shaping of technology entrepreneurship. First, the study empirically test if government policies are effective to foster technology entrepreneurship using unbalanced panel data set of selected countries covering 7 years. Second, the government policies are divided into direct and indirect policies to compare the differences. Third, the moderating role of uncertainty avoidance (one of national culture) on the relationship between the government policies and technology entrepreneurship is identified. The results showed that two different indirect and direct government policies give different impacts on technology entrepreneurial activity level, and the uncertainty avoidance moderates the effects of the public policies. The results imply that appropriate combination of the two different policies should be selected considering not only the overall differential impacts but also their country-specific cultural context.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. Amit, R., "Entrepreneurial ability, venture investments, and risk sharing", Management Science, 36(10), pp.1233~1246 (1990)
  2. "Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2013 Global Report" (2013)[URL]
  3. Bailetti, T., "Technology entrepreneurship: Overview, definition, and distinctive aspects", Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(2), pp.5~12 (2012)
  4. "Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2008 Executive Report" (2008)[URL]
  5. "GEM manual: A report on the design, data and quality control of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor" (2017)[URL]
  6. Carree, M., "Public policies for fostering entrepreneurship: A European perspective", pp.15~34 (2009), Springer
  7. Clark, T., "International marketing and national character: A review and proposal for an integrative theory", Journal of Marketing, 54(4), pp.66~79 (1990)
  8. Cumming, D., "Public policy, entrepreneurship, and venture capital in the United States", Journal of Corporate Finance, 23, pp.345~367 (2013)
  9. Dai, W., "Government policies and firms’ entrepreneurial orientation : Strategic choice and institutional perspectives", Journal of Business Research, 93, pp.23~36 (2018)
  10. Datta-Chaudhuri, M., "Market failure and government failure", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(3), pp.25~39 (1990)
  11. Davari, A., "Impact of entrepreneurship policies on opportunity to startup", Management Science Letters, 7(9), pp.431~438 (2017)
  12. Dheer, R. J. S., "Cross-national differences in entrepreneurial activity : role of culture and institutional factors", Small Business Economics, 48(4), pp.813~842 (2017)
  13. Fuentelsaz, L., "Formal institutions and opportunity entrepreneurship. The contingent role of informal institutions", BRQ Business Research Quarterly (2018)
  14. Garud, R., "Bricolage versus breakthrough : distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship", Research Policy, 32(2), pp.277~300 (2003)
  15. Giesecke, S., "The contrasting roles of government in the development of biotechnology industry in the US and Germany", Research Policy, 29(2), pp.205~223 (2000)
  16. Greene, W., "Econometric Analysis" (2012), Pearson Education Ltd
  17. Grilli, L., "Government, venture capital and the growth of European high-tech entrepreneurial firms", Research Policy, 43(9), pp.1523~1543 (2014)
  18. Guerini, M., "Governmental venture capital in Europe : Screening and certification", Journal of Business Venturing, 31(2), pp.175~195 (2016)
  19. Hall, E.T., "Understanding cultural differences: Germans, French and Americans" (1990), Intercultural Press Inc
  20. Hayton, J. C., "National culture and entrepreneurship : A review of behavioral research", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), pp.33~52 (2002)
  21. Hill, C. W. L., "International business: Competing in the global marketplace" (2014), McGraw-Hill Education
  22. Hofstede, G., "Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context", Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1) (2011)
  23. Hofstede, G., "Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind" (2010), McGraw-Hill Education
  24. House, R. J., "Culture, leadership, and organizations:The GLOBE study of 62 societies" (2004), SAGE Publications
  25. 황정아, "국가문화와 기술혁신 활동의 상호 관계에 대한 탐구: 문헌고찰과 새로운 논의 및 연구방향", 기술혁신연구, 26(2), pp.1~36 (2018), 기술경영경제학회[DOI]
  26. 임교순, "창업지원제도가 잠재적 창업가의 창업의지에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 15(11), pp.422~432 (2015), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  27. 정태흠, "국가문화가 기업가적 활동과 창업동기에 미치는 역할", 기업가정신과 벤처연구, 15(4), pp.29~55 (2012), 한국중소기업학회
  28. Entrepreneurship policies: Principles, problems and opportunities, "Karlsson, C.", CISEG, ~, pp.CISEG Working Papers Series 7 (2009)
  29. Kim, Y., "The effect of public policy on entrepreneurial activity:Evidence from OECD countries", ICSB World Conference Proceedings, 2017 (2010)
  30. 곽규태, "정부 정책이 창업기업의 성과에 미치는 영향 : 지원의 수단, 대상 그리고 방식을 중심으로", 한국혁신학회지, 13(2), pp.83~103 (2018), 한국혁신학회[DOI]
  31. 권명규, "융복합 산업 분야에서의 창업지원정책 및 기업가 정신이 창업의지에 미치는 영향 - 사업실패 부담감과 자기효능감의 조절효과를 고려하여 -", 디지털융복합연구, 14(5), pp.21~37 (2016), 한국디지털정책학회[DOI]
  32. Li, Y., "Formal institutions, culture, and venture capital activity:A cross-country analysis", Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), pp.95~111 (2012)
  33. Liñán, F., "National culture, entrepreneurship and economic development: different patterns across the European Union", Small Business Economics, 42(4), pp.685~701 (2014)
  34. Liu, T. H., "Technology entrepreneurial styles:A comparison of UMC and TSMC", International Journal of Technology Management, 29(1-2), pp.92~115 (2005)
  35. Morris, M. H., "Fostering corporate entrepreneurship:Cross-cultural comparisons of the importance of individualism versus collectivism", Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1), pp.65~89 (1994)
  36. Mueller, S.L., "Culture and entrepreneurial potential : A nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness", Journal of Business Venturing, 16(1), pp.51~75 (2001)
  37. Namenwirth, J.Z., "Dynamics of culture" (2016), Routledge
  38. Nichols, S.P., "Engineering entrepreneurship : does entrepreneurship have a role in engineering education?", IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 45(1), pp.134~138 (2003)
  39. 박남규, "정부의 창업지원정책이 창업가의 기업가정신 및 창업의지에 미치는 영향", 벤처창업연구, 10(6), pp.89~98 (2015), 한국벤처창업학회[DOI]
  40. Pinillos, M.J., "Relationship between individualist-collectivist culture and entrepreneurial activity : evidence from Global Entrepreneurship Monitor data", Small Business Economics, 37(1), pp.23~37 (2011)
  41. Salmenkaita, J.P., "Rationales for government intervention in the commercialization of new technologies", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 14(2), pp.183~200 (2002)
  42. Schulz, M., "Hybrid entrepreneurship and public policy : The case of firm entry deregulation", Journal of Business Venturing, 31(3), pp.272~286 (2016)
  43. Shane, S., "Cultural influences on national rates of innovation", Journal of Business Venturing, 8(1), pp.59~73 (1993)
  44. Shane, S., "Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures", Management Science, 48(3), pp.364~381 (2002)
  45. Stiglitz, J. E., "Government and Markets: Toward a New Theory of Regulation", pp.13~51 (2010), Cambridge University Press
  46. Wennekers, S., "Uncertainty avoidance and the rate of business ownership across 21 OECD countries, 1976-2004", Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17(2), pp.133~160 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

우리나라의 기업가적 국가문화의 진단과 향후과제: OECD 국가와의 비교를 중심으로한유진한국창업학회 · 한국창업학회지2017 · 제12권 제1호기업가정신에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 국가 간 비교연구 : 제도이론 관점권영철, 장금룡, 정추매한국창업학회 · 한국창업학회지2019 · 제14권 제2호규제의 역설: 국가혁신성에 대한 기술창업의 영향 및 규제환경의 조절효과이찬희, 정두희, 정해준한국혁신학회 · 한국혁신학회지2019 · 제14권 제3호국가문화와 기술혁신 활동의 상호 관계에 대한 탐구: 문헌고찰과 새로운 논의 및 연구방향김연배, 박경민, 송창현, 이정민, 최인철, 황정아기술경영경제학회 · 기술혁신연구2018 · 제26권 제2호Nonlinear Relationship Between Technological Entrepreneurship and National Competitiveness: The Moderation Effect of Innovation-driven Economy김용신, 양승린, 정두희기술경영경제학회 · 기술혁신연구2019 · 제27권 제3호국가문화 특성과 경제발전 수준이 창업활동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구김성건, 김중화, 이성준, 주한별한국상업경영학회 · 상업경영연구2023 · 제37권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

기업벤처투자사(Corporate Venture Capital)의 성과 및 성과요인에 대한 연구조영상, 윤영석pp. 1-31기술지주회사 자회사의 기술사업화 애로요인 분석 - 부산지역을 중심으로 -허필우, 이민규, 천동필pp. 61-94The effect of cultural differences on the preference of online game items: Focusing on the free-to-play game model이대호, 최기석pp. 95-126플립드러닝(Flipped Learning)수업방식에 대한 학습자 역량의 기대효과를 통한 만족도 분석허진, 홍아름pp. 127-149시장검증 활동이 기술사업화의 성공에 미치는 영향에 관한 탐색연구조동환, 양현봉, 박종복pp. 151-179
원문 보기