본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국판 DSM-5 성격질문지(K-PID-5) 타당화: 반복 연구

Replication of a Validation Study on the Korean Version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (K-PID-5)

황순택|홍태화|김율리
한국임상심리학회 (Korean Clinical Psychology Association)|2018.11|Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology|제37권 제4호|pp. 558-572|DOI https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2018.37.4.008

3

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

성격personality요인구조factor structure성격장애DSM-5 Section IIIK-PID-5personality disorderDSM-5 section III
주제분류심리과학

초록

DSM-5 성격질문지(The Personality Inventory for DSM-5, PID-5)는 성격장애를 평가하기 위하여 DSM-5 Section III 성격장애의 핵심기준인 병리적 성격 특질을 반영하여 개발된 척도이다. DSM-5 성격질문지를 한국어로 번안하여 신뢰도와 타당도를 검증한 선행연구(Shin & Hwang, 2016)에서 영문판과는 불일치하는 요인구조가 나타났다. 본 연구는 선행연구에 사용된 문항들을 부분적으로 수정하여 요인구조를 재탐색하기 위해 수행되었다. 만 18세 이상의 성인 510명을 대상으로 수정된 한국판 PID-5(K-PID-5), 성격장애 진단검사, Personality Psychopathology Five(PSY-5) 척도, 그리고 NEO-Five Factor Inventory를 실시하였다. 수집된 자료로 신뢰도를 확인한 결과 내적합치도와검사-재검사 신뢰도는 적절한 수준으로 나타났다. 탐색적 및 확인적 요인분석 결과 영문판과 거의 동일한 요인구조로 나타났다. 또한 성격장애 진단검사, PSY-5 척도, NEO-FFI의 관련 변인들과 통계적으로 유의한 상관관계를 보였다. 본 반복연구 결과는 선행연구와는 달리 KPID- 5가 영문판과 거의 동일한 요인구조로 구성되어 있음을 보여주는 것이며, 또한 이 도구가 선행연구에서 확인한 바 DSM-5 Section III 성격병리에 대한 신뢰롭고 타당한 평가도구임을 재확인해주는 것이다.

Abstract

The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) was developed to reflect pathological personality traits, a key criterion for Section III personality disorders. Previous study examined the validity of the Korean version of PID-5 (K-PID-5). They reported that some of factors in its structure were inconsistent with those of the English version of PID-5. The present study aimed to replicate the validity of a modified version of the K-PID-5, items of which were revised from the previous version of the KPID- 5. A sample of 510 adults completed the K-PID-5, the Korean Personality Disorders Test, the Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5), and the NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). The results confirmed that the modified K-PID-5 had adequate test-retest reliability and construct validity. The K-PID-5 had a similar factor structure to that of the English version of PID-5. Additionally, it had significant correlations with the Korean Personality Disorders Test, PSY-5, and NEO-FFI. In conclusion, the modified K-PID-5 exhibited adequate reliability and validity for estimating DSM-5 Section III personality disorders.

참고문헌 (55)

  1. Al-Attiyah, A. A., "The psychometric properties of an Arabic version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5(PID-5)across three Arabic-speaking Middle Eastern countries", International Journal of Culture and Mental Health, 10, pp.197~205 (2017)
  2. American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders" (2013), American Psychiatric Association
  3. Anderson, J. L., "Associations between DSM-5 section III personality traits and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2-Restructured Form(MMPI-2-RF)scales in a psychiatric patient sample", Psychological Assessment, 27, pp.801~815 (2015)
  4. Anderson, J. L., "On the convergence between PSY-5 domains and PID-5 domains and facets implications for assessament of DSM-5 personality traits", Assessment, 20, pp.286~294 (2013)
  5. Anderson, J., "A comparison of the DSM-5 section II and section III personality disorder structures", Psychiatry Research, 216, pp.363~372 (2014)
  6. Bagozzi, R. P., "A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research", Organizational research Methods, 1, pp.45~87 (1998)
  7. Bussing, R., "Self-esteem in special education children with ADHD : Relationship to disorder characteristics and medication use", Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, pp.1260~1269 (2000)
  8. Chmielewski, M., "Openness to experience, intellect, schizotypal personality disorder, and psychoticism : Resolving the controversy", Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, pp.483~499 (2014)
  9. Clark, L. A., "Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder : Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization", Annual Review of Psychology, 58, pp.227~257 (2007)
  10. Cordery, J. L., "Responses to the original and revised Job Diagnostic Survey: Is education a factor in responses to negatively worded items?", Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, pp.141~143 (1993)
  11. Costa, P. T., "Normal personality assessment in clinical practice : The NEO Personality Inventory", Psychological Assessment, 4, pp.5~13 (1992)
  12. De Fruyt, F., "General and maladaptive traits in a fivefactor framework for DSM-5 in a university student sample", Assessment, 20, pp.295~307 (2013)
  13. Dellaert, F., "The expectation maximization algorithm" (2002), Georgia Institute of Technology
  14. DeYoung, C. G., "Ten aspects of the big five in the Personality Inventory for DSM–5", Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7, pp.113~123 (2016)
  15. Dunkley, D. M., "What is DAS self-critical perfectionism really measuring? Relations with the five-factor model of personality and depressive symptoms", Personality and Individual Differences, 44, pp.1295~1305 (2008)
  16. Dunkley, D. M., "Specific perfectionism components versus self-criticism in predicting maladjustment", Personality and Individual Differences, 40, pp.665~676 (2006)
  17. Few, L. R., "Examination of the section III DSM-5 diagnostic system for personality disorders in an outpatient clinical sample", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, pp.1057~1069 (2013)
  18. Fossati, A., "Reliability and validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5(PID-5) : Predicting DSM-IV personality disorders and psychopathy in community-dwelling Italian adults", Assessment, 20, pp.689~708 (2013)
  19. Gore, W. L., "The DSM–5 dimensional trait model and the five factor model", doctor, pp.2013
  20. Gore, W. L., "The DSM-5 dimensional trait model and five-factor models of general personality", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, pp.816~821 (2013)
  21. Gorsuch, R. L., "Factor analysis" (1983), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  22. Harkness, A. R., "The personality psychopathology five(PSY-5) : Constructs and MMPI-2 scales", Psychological Assessment, 7, pp.104~114 (1995)
  23. Hong, S. H., "The criteria for selecting appropriate fit indices in structural equation modeling and their rationales", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19, pp.161~177 (2000)
  24. 홍세희, "부정문항이 포함된 검사의 요인구조: 자아존중감 검사의 예", 교육평가연구, 24(3), pp.713~732 (2011), 한국교육평가학회
  25. Hong, T. H., "Construction and validation of the Korean version Personality Inventory for DSM-5Short Form (K-PID-5-SF)", Manuscript in preparation, ~ (2018)
  26. Hopwood, C. J., "DSM-5 personality traits and DSM–IV personality disorders", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, pp.424~432 (2012)
  27. Just, M. A., "Drawing inferences from the presuppositions and implications of affirmative and negative sentences", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, pp.21~31 (1973)
  28. Kim, G. S., "The structural equation modeling" (2007), Hannarae
  29. Kline, P., "An easy guide to factor analysis" (1994), Routledge
  30. 고길곤, "설문조사에서 문항의 역코딩 여부가 응답결과에 미치는 영향: 자아존중감과 자기효능감 측정 사례를 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 49(3), pp.515~539 (2015), 한국행정학회[DOI]
  31. Krueger, R. F., "Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5", Psychological Medicine, 42, pp.1879~1980 (2012)
  32. Lee, K. I., "Factor structure and maladaptive group profiles of the revised NEO Personality Inventory for Korean", Doctor, pp.1995
  33. Little, T. D., "Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one", Psychological Methods, 18, pp.285~300 (2013)
  34. Marsh, H. W., "Positive and negative global self-esteem: A substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors?", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, pp.810~819 (1996)
  35. Moon, S. B., "Basic concepts and applications of structural equation modeling" (2009), Hakjisa
  36. Quilty, L. C., "The psychometric properties of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in an APA DSM-5 field trial sample", Assessment, 20, pp.362~369 (2013)
  37. Quilty, L. C., "Correlates of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale method effects", Structural Equation Modeling, 13, pp.99~117 (2006)
  38. Schmitt, N., "Factors defined by negatively keyed items: The result of careless respondents?", Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, pp.367~373 (1985)
  39. Schriesheim, C. A., "Controlling acquiescence response bias by item reversals : The effect on questionnaire validity", Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, pp.1101~1114 (1981)
  40. Sellbom, M., "Assessing DSM-5 section III personality traits and disorders with the MMPI-RF", Assessment, 20, pp.709~722 (2013)
  41. 서재삼, "한국형 성격장애 진단검사의 개발과 타당화", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25(1), pp.273~288 (2006), 한국임상심리학회
  42. 서수균, "자존감 및 자기애 성향과 공격성의 관계", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21(4), pp.809~826 (2002), 한국임상심리학회
  43. 신현균, "대학 4학년생의 성격특성과 성별에 따른 취업 스트레스 및 정신건강", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22(4), pp.815~827 (2003), 한국임상심리학회
  44. 신소영, "한국판 DSM-5 성격검사(PID-5)의 신뢰도와 타당도", 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 30(3), pp.1~24 (2016), 한국사회및성격심리학회[DOI]
  45. Skodol, A. E., "Personality disorder types proposed for DSM-5", Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, pp.136~169 (2011)
  46. South, S. C., "A population based twin study of DSM–5 maladaptive personality domains", Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8, pp.366~375 (2017)
  47. Suzuki, T., "DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as maladaptive extreme variants of the five-factor model : An item-response theory analysis", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, pp.343~354 (2015)
  48. Swain, S. D., "Assessing three sources of misresponse to reversed Likert items", Journal of Marketing Research, 45, pp.116~131 (2008)
  49. Tabachnick, B. G., "Using multivariate statistics", pp.2007, Allyn & Bacon
  50. Thomas, K. M., "The convergent structure of DSM-5 personality trait facets and five-factor model trait domains", Assessment, 3, pp.308~311 (2012)
  51. Watson, D., "Affects separable and inseparable : On the hierarchical arrangement of negative affects", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, pp.489~505 (1992)
  52. Weijters, B., "Misresponse to reversed and negated items in surveys : A review", Journal of Marketing Research, 49, pp.737~747 (2012)
  53. Widiger, T. A., "Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder : Shifting to a dimensional model", American Psychologist, 62, pp.71~83 (2007)
  54. Yam, W. H., "Comparing criterion-and traitbased personality disorder diagnoses in DSM-5", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 123, pp.802~808 (2014)
  55. Zimmermann, J., "The structure and correlates of self-reported DSM–5 maladaptive personality traits : Findings from two German-speaking samples", Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, pp.513~540 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

한국판 DSM-5 성격검사(PID-5)의 신뢰도와 타당도신소영, 황순택한국사회및성격심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격2016 · 제30권 제3호한국판 DSM-5 성격질문지 단축형(Korean version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form, K-PID-5-SF)의 구성과 타당화김율리, 홍태화, 황순택한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2018 · 제37권 제3호한국판 DSM-5 성격질문지 정보제공자보고형(K-PID-5-IRF)의 신뢰도와 타당도안선영, 황순택한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2019 · 제38권 제1호한국판 ICD-11 성격장애 심각도 평가 (PDS-ICD-11)의 타당화곽경화, 권은정, 김율리, 양재원, 김미리혜한국건강심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 건강2023 · 제28권 제1호한국판 Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Personality Disorder Scale의 확인적 요인분석: 임상표본을 대상으로김상훈, 김정호, 김학렬, 박상학, 이문인, 임남열한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2011 · 제30권 제1호한국형 성격장애 진단검사의 개발과 타당화서재삼, 황순택한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2006 · 제25권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)

우울증 환자 집단에서 비자살적자해가 자살시도에 미치는 영향장혜인, 이승환, 김초롱pp. 465-478성장글쓰기가 데이트 폭력 피해자의 기본 세계관과 친밀한 관계에 대한 두려움에 미치는 영향현명호, 홍혜인pp. 479-490분노표현양식이 폭식행동에 미치는 영향: 부정정서 조급성의 매개 효과박경, 임지수pp. 491-502가족응집성과 폭식행동의 관계에서 자기위로능력과 우울의 매개 효과이종헌, 박기환pp. 503-514Emotional Distress Tolerance and Pain Tolerance: The Moderating Effect of Painful Events서장원pp. 515-521
원문 보기