본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국판 DSM-5 성격질문지 정보제공자보고형(K-PID-5-IRF)의 신뢰도와 타당도

Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Informant-Report Form of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (K-PID-5-IRF)

황순택|안선영
한국임상심리학회 (Korean Clinical Psychology Association)|2019.02|Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology|제38권 제1호|pp. 82-101|DOI https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2019.38.1.007

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

DSM-5성격장애DSM-5 Section IIIDSM-5 성격질문지K-PID-5K-PID-5-IRF정보제공자보고형personality disorderDSM-5 section IIIpersonality inventory for DSM-5informant report
주제분류심리과학

초록

이 연구에서는 5개의 영역(domain)과 25개의 하위 양상(facet)으로 구성된 DSM-5 성격 특질 모델을 측정하기 위해 개발된 DSM-5 성격질문지(Personality Inventory for DSM-5, PID-5) 정보제공자보고형을 한국어로 번안하여 이 척도의 신뢰도와 타당도를 검증하였다. 우선영문판 PID-5 정보제공자보고형 문항들을 번역과 역번역 과정을 통해 우리말로 번안하고, 이 검사의 자기보고형인 K-PID-5(Shin & Hwang, 2016)와 문항 간 의미가 일치하도록 전체 문항을 구성하였다. 만 18세 이상의 대학생 및 일반인을 대상으로 K-PID-5 정보제공자보고형(230명)과 K-PID-5 자기보고형 및 성격장애 진단검사(176명)를 실시하였다. 분석 결과, K-PID-5 정보제공자보고형의 영역 및 양상들의 내적 일치도는 높은 수준이었다. 또한, 요인구조는 영문판 PID-5 정보제공자보고형의 요인구조 및 DSM-5 성격 특질 모델과 요인의수, 3가지 양상에서 차이가 있었으나 전반적으로 적절히 부합하였다. K-PID-5 정보제공자보고형-자기보고형의 일치도는 영문판 PID-5 정보제공자보고형-자기보고형의 일치도보다 약간 낮은 수준이었지만 성격에 관한 정보제공자보고형-자기보고형의 상관 연구들에서 확인할 수 있는 적합한 수준으로 나타났다. 마지막으로, K-PID-5 정보제공자보고형의 영역 및 양상들은 각 성격장애의 핵심 성격 특질에 비교적 적절하게 부합하였다. 이러한 결과는 K-PID-5 정보제공자보고형이 우리나라 성인의 성격 특질을 신뢰롭고 타당하게 평가할 수 있는 도구임을 시사한다.

Abstract

This study set out to translate into Korean the Informant-Report Form of Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5-IRF), which was developed to measure the DSM-5 Personality Trait Model comprised of five domains and 25 facets, and test the reliability and validity of the Korean version. For these purposes, the items of PID-5-IRF in English were translated into Korean through the process of translation and reverse translation and organized the entire items so that they would have consistent meanings with the items of the Korean version of the Self-Report Form of PID-5 (K-PID-5-SRF). K-PID-5-IRF (n=230) and K-PID-5-SRF & the Korean Personality Disorders Test (n=176) were conducted to college students and ordinary citizens aged 18 or older. The analysis results show that K-PID-5-IRF recorded a high level of internal consistency in domains and facets. Its factor structure properly matched overall that of PID-5-IRF in English and that of the DSM-5 Personality Trait Model despite number of factors and differences in three facets between them. Concordance between K-PID-5-SRF and KPID- 5-IRF was a little bit lower than that of their English counterparts, but it had statistically significant correlations and was in a proper level founded in researches on correlations between the informant-report form and the self-report form on personality. Finally, domains and facets of K-PID-5-IRF had a relatively appropriate match with the core personality traits of each personality disorder. These findings imply that K-PID-5-IRF is a tool to assess the personality traits of grown-ups in a reliably and valid manner.

참고문헌 (69)

  1. American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder" (1994), American Psychiatric Association
  2. American Psychiatric Association., "Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder" (2013), American Psychiatric Association
  3. Asendorpf, J. B., "Is self-enhancement healthy? Conceptual, psychometric, and empirical analysis", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, pp.955~966 (1998)
  4. Bergman, A. J., "Correlates with perfectionism and the utility of a dual process model", Personality and Individual Differences, 43, pp.389~399 (2007)
  5. Bernieri, F. J., "Measuring person perception accuracy : Another look at selfother agreement", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, pp.367~378 (1994)
  6. Biesanz, J. C., "Towards understanding assessments of the Big Five : Multitrait-multimethod analyses of convergent and discriminant validity across measurement occasion and type of observer", Journal of Personality, 72, pp.845~876 (2004)
  7. Biesanz, J. C., "What do you learn about someone over time? The relationship between length of acquaintance and consensus and self-other agreement in judgments of personality", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, pp.119~135 (2007)
  8. Broday, S. F., "Perfectionism and millon basic personality patterns", Psychological Reports, 63, pp.791~794 (1988)
  9. Carlson, E. N., "Honestly arrogant or simply misunderstood? Narcissists’ awareness of their narcissism", Self and Identity, 12, pp.259~277 (2013)
  10. Carlson, E. N., "Self-other knowledge asymmetries in personality pathology", Journal of Personality, 81, pp.155~170 (2013)
  11. Chmielewski, M., "The heterogeneous structure of schizotypal personality disorder : Item-level factors of the schizotypal personality questionnaire and their associations with obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms, dissociative tendencies, and normal personality", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, pp.364~376 (2008)
  12. 조은성, "탐색적 요인분석 사용의 적절성 검토: ‘마케팅연구’1986년 ~ 2006년", 마케팅연구, 22(3), pp.179~208 (2007), 한국마케팅학회
  13. 조성희, "정신감정 결과 정상으로 판단된 범죄자들과 장애 진단 집단 간의 비교 연구: MMPI-2 프로파일을 중심으로", 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 22(2), pp.45~58 (2008), 한국사회및성격심리학회[DOI]
  14. Clifton, A., "Self-and peer perspectives on pathological personality traits and interpersonal problems", Psychological Assessment, 17, pp.123~131 (2005)
  15. Colvin, C. R., "Predicting personality and behavior : A boundary on the acquaintanceship effect", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, pp.884~894 (1991)
  16. Comrey, A. L., "A first course in factor analysis" (1992), Lawrence Erlbaum
  17. Connelly, B. S., "An other perspective in personality : Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity", Psychological Bulletin, 136, pp.1092~1122 (2010)
  18. Connolly, J. J., "The convergent validity between self and observer ratings of personality : A meta-analytic review", International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, pp.110~117 (2007)
  19. Coolidge, F. L., "Reliability of observer ratings in the assessment of personality disorders : A preliminary study", Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, pp.22~28 (1995)
  20. Duckworth, A. L., "A meta-analysis of the convergent validity of self-control measures", Journal of Research in Personality, 45, pp.259~268 (2011)
  21. Dunkley, D. M., "The relation between perfectionism and distress : Hassles, coping, and perceived social support as mediators and moderators", Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, pp.437~453 (2000)
  22. Egan, S. J., "Perfectionism as a transdiagnostic process : A clinical review", Clinical Psychology Review, 31, pp.203~212 (2011)
  23. Enns, M. W., "Perfectionism and depression symptom severity in major depressive disorder", Behavior Research and Therapy, 37, pp.783~794 (1999)
  24. Flett, G. L., "Self-oriented perfectionism, neuroticism and anxiety", Personality and Individual Differences, 10, pp.731~735 (1989)
  25. Frost, R. O., "The dimensions of perfectionism", Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, pp.449~468 (1990)
  26. Funder, D. C., "Friends and strangers : Acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, pp.149~158 (1988)
  27. Funder, D. C., "Agreement among judges of personality : Interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, pp.656~672 (1995)
  28. Grove, W. M., "Problems in the classification of personality disorders", Journal of Personality Disorder, 5, pp.31~41 (1991)
  29. Hayes, A. F., "Construal processes and trait ambiguity : Implications for self-peer agreement in personality judgment", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, pp.664~677 (1997)
  30. Hewitt, P. L., "Perfectionism in the self and social context : Conceptualization, assessment and association with psychopathology", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, pp.456~470 (1991)
  31. Hirschfeld, R. M., "Personality disorders: Definition and diagnosis", Journal of Personality Disorders, (Suppl. 1), pp.9~17 (1993)
  32. Hogan, R., "Reinventing personality", Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, pp.1~10 (1998)
  33. 황순택, "DSM-Ⅳ 성격장애와 성격 5요인 간의 관계", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27(3), pp.777~787 (2008), 한국임상심리학회[DOI]
  34. 장지영, "부부의 성격과 결혼만족도 간의 관계", 한국심리학회지:여성, 17(2), pp.133~148 (2012), 한국여성심리학회[DOI]
  35. 진하영, "성격장애성향의 대인관계 문제: 자기-타인지각 비교", 인간이해, 31(2), pp.211~230 (2010), 학생생활상담연구소
  36. Kaiser, H. F., "An index of factorial simplicity", Psychometrika, 39, pp.31~36 (1974)
  37. Klein, D. N., "Patients’ versus informants’ reports of personality disorders in predicting 7 1", 2-year outcome in outpatients with depressive disorders, 2003, pp.15, 216~222
  38. Klonsky, E. D., "Informantreports of personality disorders : Relation to self-reports and future research directions", Clinical Psychology : Science and Practice, 9, pp.300~311 (2002)
  39. Krueger, R. F., "Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait mode and inventory for DSM-5", Psychological Medicine, 42, pp.1879~1890 (2012)
  40. Lee, S. M., "Basis of factor analysis" (2000), Kyoyookbook
  41. Luo, S., "Accuracy and biases in newlyweds’perceptions of each other : Not mutually exclusive but mutually beneficial", Psychological Science, 20, pp.1332~1339 (2009)
  42. Malloy, T. E., "Interpersonal perception and meta-perception in nonoverlapping social groups", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, pp.390~398 (1997)
  43. Markon, K. E., "The development and psychometric properties of an informantreport form of the personality inventory for DSM-5(PID-5)", Assessment, 20, pp.370~383 (2013)
  44. McGrath, R. E., "Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment", Psychological Bulletin, 136, pp.450~470 (2010)
  45. Naragon-Gainey, K., "Clarifying the dispositional basis of social anxiety : A hierarchical perspective", Personality and Individual Differences, 50, pp.926~934 (2011)
  46. Oh, I. S., "Validity of observer rating of the five-factor model of personality traits : A meta-analysis", Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, pp.762~773 (2011)
  47. Olino, T. M., "Psychometric comparison of self-and informant-reports of personality", Assessment, 22, pp.655~664 (2015)
  48. Oltmanns, T. F., "Meta-perception for pathological personality traits: Do we know when other think that we are difficult?", Consciousness and Cognition, 14, pp.739~751 (2005)
  49. Oltmanns, T. F., "Person perception and personality pathology", Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, pp.32~36 (2009)
  50. Paulhus, D. L., "The effect of acquaintanceship on the validity of personality impressions : A longitudinal study", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, pp.816~824 (1992)
  51. Paunonen, S. V., "Consensus in personality judgments : Moderating effects of target-rater acquaintanceship and behavior observability", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, pp.823~833 (1989)
  52. Rushton, J. P., "Behavioral development and construct validity : The principle of aggregation", Psychological Bulletin, 94, pp.18~38 (1983)
  53. Samuel, D. B., "A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders : A facet level analysis", Clinical Psychology Review, 28, pp.1326~1342 (2008)
  54. Saulsman, L. M., "The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature : A meta-analytic review", Clinical Psychology Review, 23, pp.1055~1085 (2004)
  55. 서재삼, "한국형 성격장애 진단검사의 개발과 타당화", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25(1), pp.273~288 (2006), 한국임상심리학회
  56. Seong, T. J., "Research Methodology" (2014), Hakjisa
  57. 신소영, "한국판 DSM-5 성격검사(PID-5)의 신뢰도와 타당도", 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 30(3), pp.1~24 (2016), 한국사회및성격심리학회[DOI]
  58. Stevens, J. P., "Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences" (1992), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  59. Swann, W. B. Jr., "The trouble with change : Self-verification and allegiance to the self", Psychological Science, 8, pp.177~180 (1997)
  60. Tucker, L. R., "Exploratory factor analysis", Ohio State University, ~ (1997)
  61. Vazire, S., "Informant reports : A cheap, fast, and easy method for personality assessment", Journal of Research in Personality, 40, pp.472~481 (2006)
  62. Vazire, S., "Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry(SOKA)model", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, pp.281~300 (2010)
  63. Vazire, S., "Self-knowledge of personality:Do people know themselves?", Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, pp.605~620 (2010)
  64. Vazire, S., "Other sometimes know us better than we know ourselves", Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, pp.104~108 (2011)
  65. Watson, D., "Self-versus peer ratings of specific emotional traits : Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, pp.927~940 (1991)
  66. Watson, D., "Self-other agreement in personality and affectivity : The role of acquaintanceship, trait visibility, and assumed similarity", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, pp.546~558 (2000)
  67. Westen, D., "Divergences between clinical and research methods for assessing personality disorders : Implications for research and the evolution of Axis II", American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, pp.895~903 (1997)
  68. Westen, D., "Handbook of self and identity", pp.643~666 (2003), Guilford Press
  69. 황상민, "자기 성격에 대한 타인 평가 인식 유형: 성격에 관한 한국인의 인식 탐색", 주관성 연구, (20), pp.121~143 (2010), 한국주관성연구학회

관련 논문AI추천

한국판 DSM-5 성격검사(PID-5)의 신뢰도와 타당도신소영, 황순택한국사회및성격심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격2016 · 제30권 제3호한국판 DSM-5 성격질문지(K-PID-5) 타당화: 반복 연구김율리, 홍태화, 황순택한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2018 · 제37권 제4호한국판 DSM-5 성격질문지 단축형(Korean version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form, K-PID-5-SF)의 구성과 타당화김율리, 홍태화, 황순택한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2018 · 제37권 제3호한국판 Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Personality Disorder Scale의 확인적 요인분석: 임상표본을 대상으로김상훈, 김정호, 김학렬, 박상학, 이문인, 임남열한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2011 · 제30권 제1호한국판 ICD-11 성격장애 심각도 평가 (PDS-ICD-11)의 타당화곽경화, 권은정, 김율리, 양재원, 김미리혜한국건강심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 건강2023 · 제28권 제1호한국어판 DSM-IV 인격장애 구조화된 면담도구 개발：신뢰도 연구권수희, 박수빈, 방수영, 송해철, 이동은, 이선형, 홍진표대한신경정신의학회 · 신경정신의학2010 · 제49권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

즐거움 경험의 예기적/소비적 요소가 무쾌감성 우울 증상에 미치는 영향이슬아, 민혜원, 권석만pp. 1-12부정정서와 정서조절곤란이 고위험 여자대학생의 신경성 폭식 증상에 미치는 영향이수진, 장혜인pp. 13-28스마트폰 중독 위험 대학생들의 스마트폰의 과다사용, 일상적 기능의 손상 및 정신건강에 대한 마음챙김에 기반을 둔 개입의 효능 및 자기조절력의 매개 역할조용래, 노상선, 남수아pp. 29-44삶의 중단 여부 결정에 관여하는 판단 요소들최소영, 박기환pp. 45-59일상 생활 속 자아 고갈 및 심리적 부담감이 피로도에 미치는 효과: 자기애적 성격을 중심으로문기범, 고영건, 이승진pp. 60-69
원문 보기