L'icône, l'hypoicône et la métaphore: L'avancée dans l'hypoicône jusqu'à la frontière du non conceptualisable
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
After briefly defining the central notion of icon in its relations to the three phaneroscopic categories, the author deals more specifically with the hypoicons: the image, the diagram, and the metaphor. As a result of that analysis, it appears that the metaphor-trope should rather be understood as pertaining to the logic of the diagram. Metaphor, given under the hypoicon analysis, is defined as an inference that registers a discovery process announcing an object not yet conceptualizable. Referring to the historic context of the Lowell Conferences of 1903, the author is led to recognize the strangeness of the definition of metaphor, which, because of contradictions acknowledged by Peirce himself, does not fit into the conception of the first semiotics. The author, therefore, interprets this proposition made by Peirce as an exploratory advancement, or as a leap forward opening the way to the elaboration of the second semiotics, of which the central concept -the nonfulfillement of the sign, the “would be”, the “semiosis ad infinitum”- perfectly integrates this notion of metaphor. Brought closer to the epistemological positions historically attributed to Nietzsche- a contemporary of Peirce -, and also to those of the surrealists -whose advent was near-metaphor is thought in a logic belonging as much to the order of the cognition as to that of the aesthetics.
Abstract
After briefly defining the central notion of icon in its relations to the three phaneroscopic categories, the author deals more specifically with the hypoicons: the image, the diagram, and the metaphor. As a result of that analysis, it appears that the metaphor-trope should rather be understood as pertaining to the logic of the diagram. Metaphor, given under the hypoicon analysis, is defined as an inference that registers a discovery process announcing an object not yet conceptualizable. Referring to the historic context of the Lowell Conferences of 1903, the author is led to recognize the strangeness of the definition of metaphor, which, because of contradictions acknowledged by Peirce himself, does not fit into the conception of the first semiotics. The author, therefore, interprets this proposition made by Peirce as an exploratory advancement, or as a leap forward opening the way to the elaboration of the second semiotics, of which the central concept -the nonfulfillement of the sign, the “would be”, the “semiosis ad infinitum”- perfectly integrates this notion of metaphor. Brought closer to the epistemological positions historically attributed to Nietzsche- a contemporary of Peirce -, and also to those of the surrealists -whose advent was near-metaphor is thought in a logic belonging as much to the order of the cognition as to that of the aesthetics.
참고문헌 (18)
- BALAT, Michel, "≪Rhèmes d'amour≫ dans Protée, 26,3 (≪Logique de l'icône≫), pp. 77-87", ~ (1999)
- BRETON, André, "≪Manifeste du surréalisme≫ dans Manifestes du surréalisme", pp.188~ (1924), Gallimard
- DELEDALLE, Gérard, "Charles S. Peirce, phénoménologue et sémioticien, Amsterdam, J. Benjamins, (≪Foundations of semiotics≫-14) p.114", ~ (1987)
- DELEDALLE, Gérard, "Charles S. Peirce’s Philosophy of Signs" (2000), Indiana Univertity Press
- FISETTE, Jean, "Pour une pragmatique de la signification. Suivi d’un choix de textes de Charles S. Peirce en langue française, Montréal, XYZ éditeur, (≪Documents≫) p.300", ~ (1996)
- FISETTE, Jean, "≪Parler du virtuel. La musique comme cas exemplaire de l’icône≫, dans Protée 26-3, ≪Logique de l’icône≫, pp.45-54", ~ (1999)
- FISETTE, Jean, "C.-S. Peirce, The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings. Volume 2. Compte rendu", dans Recherches sémiotiques, 2000, pp.20(1), 351~367
- HAUSMAN, Carl H., "≪Appendix. Metaphorical Reference and Peirce's Dynamical Object≫, dans Metaphor and art. Interactionism and Reference in the Verbal and Nonverbal Arts, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp.209-231", ~ (1989)
- KOFMAN, Sarah, "Nietzsche et la metaphore, Paris, Payot, (≪Bibliothèque scientifique≫) p.210", ~ (1972)
- LAKOFF, George, "Les métaphores dans la vie quotidienne", pp.1985~ (1980), Minuit
- MERLEAU-PONTY, Maurice, "Signes", pp.562~ (2001), Gallimard
- MU, groupe, "Rhétorique générale, Paris, Larousse (≪Langue et langages≫), p.206", ~ (1970)
- NÖTH, Winfried, "Handbook of semiotics", pp.576~ (1990), Indiana University Press
- PEIRCE, Charles S., "The Collected Papers (vol I-VI:1931-35 par C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss; vol.VII-VIII:1958 par W. Burks), Harvard, Harvard Univ. Press,. Abrégé ≪CP≫ suivi du numéro du tome et du numéro du paragraphe, dans les renvois", ~
- "Écrits sur le signe (Textes rassemblés, traduits et commentés par G. Deledalle), Paris, 1978, Seuil, (≪L'Ordre philosophique≫) p.268. Abrégé ≪ÉS≫ suivi de la pagination, dans les renvois", ~ (1978)
- "The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings. Vol. I (1867-1893), Edited by Nathan Houser and Christian Klosel, Bloomington, 1992, Indiana Univ. Press, p.399. Abrégé ≪EP1≫ suivi de la pagination, dans les renvois", ~ (1992)
- "The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings. Vol. II (1893-1913), Edited by the Peirce Edition Project. Nathan Houser, General Editor., Bloomington, 1998, Indiana Univ. Press, p.584. Abrégé ≪EP2≫ suivi de la pagination, dans les renvois", ~ (1998)
- SAVAN, David, "An Introduction to C. S. Peirce’s Full System Semeiotic, Toronto, Victoria College in University of Toronto, (≪Monograph Series TSC≫-1) p.74", ~ (1988)