공자의 가르침, 모호함에서 오묘함으로-『논어』의 “無言”과 “色斯舉矣” 문장을 중심으로
Confucius's teachings, From ambiguity to subtlety
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This treatise explores to clarify that the words and actions that had been considered ambiguous so far in the Analects were rather the teaching methods and processes that allowed disciples to learn the abstruse logic of life of Confucius. Among them, we looked at the sentence "wordless" that Confucius declared in the Analects and the sentence "Se si ju yi" that is famous for being difficult because of the unexpected words and actions between Guru and the disciples. These two sentences are cleverly linked, and Confucius declared that he would not speak in teaching, and as if dramatically reflecting this, Confucius answers Zaro's actions silently in the sentence "Se si ju yi". Until now, Confucius's silence had been treated only as a matter of language and practice, and the sentence "Se si ju yi" in the Analect was considered difficult and ambiguous. In this treatise, it can be seen that Confucius, in fact, tried to lead the disciples in a way similar to koan. Confucius led to the acquisition of the mysterious truth of life, especially based on the feelings and empathy between Guru and the disciples. Prior to Buddhism's koan, Confucius had already pursued the realization of similar methods and processes.
Abstract
This treatise explores to clarify that the words and actions that had been considered ambiguous so far in the Analects were rather the teaching methods and processes that allowed disciples to learn the abstruse logic of life of Confucius. Among them, we looked at the sentence "wordless" that Confucius declared in the Analects and the sentence "Se si ju yi" that is famous for being difficult because of the unexpected words and actions between Guru and the disciples. These two sentences are cleverly linked, and Confucius declared that he would not speak in teaching, and as if dramatically reflecting this, Confucius answers Zaro's actions silently in the sentence "Se si ju yi". Until now, Confucius's silence had been treated only as a matter of language and practice, and the sentence "Se si ju yi" in the Analect was considered difficult and ambiguous. In this treatise, it can be seen that Confucius, in fact, tried to lead the disciples in a way similar to koan. Confucius led to the acquisition of the mysterious truth of life, especially based on the feelings and empathy between Guru and the disciples. Prior to Buddhism's koan, Confucius had already pursued the realization of similar methods and processes.
참고문헌 (24)
- 朱熹, "四書集注章句", 『乾隆御覽四庫全書薈要』本., ~
- 朱熹, "論語精義", 『欽定四庫全書』本., ~
- 李贄, "論語評", 『續修四庫全書』本., ~
- 黎靖德, "朱子語類", 『欽定四庫全書』本., ~
- 何晏集解, "論語集解義疏", 『欽定四庫全書』本., ~
- 何晏集解, "論語注疏", 『欽定四庫全書』本., ~
- 呂不韋, "呂氏春秋", 『四部叢刊初編』本, ~
- 박영희, "주희가 제기한 闕文說의 의미와 작용―『논어』의 “色斯舉矣” 문장을 중심으로", 중국어문학지, (77), pp.89~108 (2021), 중국어문학회[DOI]
- 김보경, "직관적 사고의 교육적 의의와 교수설계에의 시사점", 교육공학연구, 34(3), pp.617~648 (2018), 한국교육공학회[DOI]
- 지정민, "교사의 무언(無言)과 무은(無隱): 논어의 교수론적 해석", 교육사학연구, 18(1), pp.83~105 (2008), 교육사학회[DOI]
- 김범수, "공자의 道에 있어서 확신할 수 없는 것의 중요성에 관하여", 철학∙사상∙문화, (26), pp.35~56 (2018), 동서사상연구소[DOI]
- 유지원, "禪宗 公案과 蘇軾의 불교적 깨달음", 동아시아불교문화, (32), pp.411~432 (2017), 동아시아불교문화학회
- 박순영, "후설의 생활세계 개념에 대한 선불교적 이해 ― 禪問答(公案)의 현상학적 이해를 위한 試論", 현상학과 현대철학, 9 (1996)
- 이철진, "話頭와 精神의 연관성 연구", 한국엔터테인먼트산업학회논문지, 12(1), pp.51~60 (2018), 한국엔터테인먼트산업학회[DOI]
- 권영화, "왕양명의 양지와 베르그손의 직관에 대한 유사성에 관한 연구", 동서철학연구, (91), pp.235~259 (2019), 한국동서철학회[DOI]
- 추병완, "도덕교육에서 직관과 추론의 관계 분석: 하이트와 나바이즈를 중심으로", 초등도덕교육, (68), pp.83~117 (2020), 한국초등도덕교육학회[DOI]
- 권기완, "탄허선사의 유교 경전에 대한 불교적 해석 ‒ 『논어』를 중심으로 ‒", 한국불교학, (81), pp.215~245 (2017), 한국불교학회
- 김성순, "깨달음과 치유를 위한 문답법 －삿상(Satsang)과 선문답－", 종교교육학연구, 39, pp.131~154 (2012), 한국종교교육학회[DOI]
- 박재현, "교육과 윤리의 맥락에서 본 話頭의기능과 역할", 대동문화연구, (108), pp.513~532 (2019), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
- 김성훈, "유가(儒家)의 의사소통방식 연구 - 공자(孔子)의 사상을 중심으로 -", 문화와융합, 41(4), pp.33~62 (2019), 한국문화융합학회
- 채석용, "사회적 직관주의자 모델에 의한 공맹 예론의 해석", 인간연구, (38), pp.203~238 (2019), 인간학연구소[DOI]
- 강경구, "중국불교의 호교론과 공자", 동아시아불교문화, (18), pp.209~239 (2014), 동아시아불교문화학회
- 이영호, "공자와 부처 : 『논어』 주석사적 전통에서 바라본 유교와 불교의 교섭양상", 양명학, (44), pp.321~356 (2016), 한국양명학회[DOI]
- "한국경학자료시스템"[URL]