<구운몽> 원본 탐색의 가능성 고찰
On the Possibility of searching the “original text" of <Guummong>
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This essay has a doubtful point explained by other researchers who endlessly tried to find the "original text" of <Guunmong(九雲夢)>. So far, we have a lot of studies on the text of <Guunmong>. All of them tried to distinguish the "original text" of <Guunmong>. However, <Guunmong> is not one of the sacred books, which people would not even change a letter of them. <Guunmong> is a novel, and anyone who transcribed it could have changed its text on purpose. Even if we suppose that there was no intentional change by transcription, it is still impossible to reconstruct the "original text" because both "A group" and "B group" texts have defective sentences, and it is believed that <Samjangsi(三章詩)> which was used as a proof was not on the "original text" from the start. The conclusion of this research is that without Seopo(西浦)'s own handwriting text of <Guunmong>, any effort to find or reconstruct the "original text" of <Guunmong> based upon existing texts, is in vain.
Abstract
This essay has a doubtful point explained by other researchers who endlessly tried to find the "original text" of <Guunmong>. So far, we have a lot of studies on the text of <Guunmong>. All of them tried to distinguish the "original text" of <Guunmong>. However, <Guunmong> is not one of the sacred books, which people would not even change a letter of them. <Guunmong> is a novel, and anyone who transcribed it could have changed its text on purpose. Even if we suppose that there was no intentional change by transcription, it is still impossible to reconstruct the "original text" because both "A group" and "B group" texts have defective sentences, and it is believed that <Samjangsi> which was used as a proof was not on the "original text" from the start. The conclusion of this research is that without Seopo's own handwriting text of <Guunmong>, any effort to find or reconstruct the "original text" of <Guunmong> based upon existing texts, is in vain.
참고문헌 (15)
- "<구운몽> 서울대본, In 구운몽 한글본" (1986), 고려서림
- "<구운몽> 노존B본, In 김만중문학연구" (1993), 국학자료원
- 정규복, "<구운몽> 을사본, In 구운몽 원전의 연구"
- "<구운몽> 을사본"
- 정규복, "구운몽 원전의 연구" (1977), 일지사
- 정규복, "구운몽 노존본의 이분화", 동방학지, 59 (1988), 연세대 국학연구원
- 정규복, "다니엘 부셰의 ｢구운몽 저작언어 변증｣ 비판", 한국학보, 69 (1992)
- D. 부셰, "구운몽 저작언어 변증", 한국학보, 68 (1992)
- D.부셰, "원문 비평의 방법론에 관한 소고", 동방학지, 95 (1997)
- 지연숙, "<구운몽>의 텍스트, In 장편소설과 여와전" (2003), 보고사
- 정길수, "구운몽 原典의 탐색", 고소설연구, (23), pp.5~34 (2007), 한국고소설학회
- 조동일, "구운몽과 금강경, 무엇이 문제인가, In 김만중연구" (1983), 새문사
- 신현우, "사본학 이야기" (2005), 웨스트민스터 출판부
- B. M. Metzger, "The Text of the New Testament, 3rd ed" (1992), Oxford: New York
- Xiaofei Tian, "Tao Yuanming & Manuscript Culture", pp.221~ (2005), Univ. of Washington