본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Mercantilism, still a Useful Concept for Imperial History?

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

Reviewing the recent historiography of British mercantilism, this paper discusses whether the concept is still useful for writing Britain’s first empire in the 17th and 18th centuries. The paper stresses the contested nature of the metropole’s mercantilist regulations within the British Atlantic, in which colonists often adapted themselves to the mercantilist regime in flexible and diverse ways. To make the empire work for their own benefits, colonists adopted mercantilist regulations selectively, and were even able to change them through vigorous lobbying to suit their local political economies. By appraising the recent contributions of Steve Pincus and others on the ideological dimension of transatlantic dialogue over mercantilism, the paper also highlights the ways in which discussion over the political economies of British empire was often intertwined with partisan politics from the late 17th century onwards. Although not entirely convinced with the argument that competing visions of empire were formulated largely within the context of Whig/Tory political strife, the paper suggests that this line of study deserve closer empirical research, which will reinvigorate discussion over mercantilism.

Abstract

Reviewing the recent historiography of British mercantilism, this paper discusses whether the concept is still useful for writing Britain’s first empire in the 17th and 18th centuries. The paper stresses the contested nature of the metropole’s mercantilist regulations within the British Atlantic, in which colonists often adapted themselves to the mercantilist regime in flexible and diverse ways. To make the empire work for their own benefits, colonists adopted mercantilist regulations selectively, and were even able to change them through vigorous lobbying to suit their local political economies. By appraising the recent contributions of Steve Pincus and others on the ideological dimension of transatlantic dialogue over mercantilism, the paper also highlights the ways in which discussion over the political economies of British empire was often intertwined with partisan politics from the late 17th century onwards. Although not entirely convinced with the argument that competing visions of empire were formulated largely within the context of Whig/Tory political strife, the paper suggests that this line of study deserve closer empirical research, which will reinvigorate discussion over mercantilism.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Armitage, David, "The Ideological Origins of the British Empire" (2000), Cambridge University Press
  2. Cary, John, "An Essay on the State of England in Relation to its Trade", Bristol
  3. Coke, Roger, "A Discourse of Trade"
  4. Davenant, Charles, "Discourses on the Public Revenues and Trade of England, 2 vols"
  5. du Rivage, Justin, "Revolution against Empire : Taxes, Politics, and the Origins of American Independence" (2017), Yale University Press
  6. Finkelstein, Andrea, "Harmony and the Balance : An Intellectual History of Seventeenth-Century English Economic Thought" (2000), University of Michigan Press
  7. Gould, Eliga H, "The Persistence of Empire : British Political Culture in the Age of the American Revolution" (2000), Univeristy of North Carolina Press
  8. Hoppit, Julian, "Britain’s Political Economies : Parliament and Economic Life, 1660-1800" (2017), Cambridge University Press
  9. Kammen, Michael, "A Rope of Sand : The Colonial Agents, British Politics, and the American Revolution" (1968), Cornell University Press
  10. Marshall, P. J., "The Making and Unmaking of Empires: Britain, India, and America, c.1750-1783" (2005), Oxford University Press
  11. Matson, Cathy, "Merchants and Empire : Trading in Colonial New York" (1997), Johns Hopkins University Press
  12. Mokyr, Joel, "The Enlightened Economy : An Economic History of Britain 1700-1850" (2009), Yale University Press
  13. Mun, Thomas, "England’s Treasure by Forraign Trade"
  14. Olson, Alison G., "Making the Empire Work: London and American Interest Groups, 1690-1790" (1992), Harvard University Press
  15. Pettigrew, William A, "Freedom’s Debt : The Royal African Company and the Politics of the Atlantic Slave Trade, 1672-1752" (2013), University of North Carolina Press
  16. Pincus, Steve, "The Heart of the Declaration : The Founders’ Case for an Activist Government" (2016), Yale University Press
  17. Reynell, Carew., "A Necessary Companion; or, the English Interest Discovered and Promoted…"
  18. Smith, Adam, "An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations" (1976), Oxford University Press
  19. Smith, Adam, "The Correspondence of Adam Smith" (1987), Oxford University Press
  20. Sosin, J. M, "Agents and Merchants : British Colonial Policy and the Origins of the American Revolution, 1763–1775" (1965), University of Nebraska Press
  21. Swingen, Abigail L, "Competing Visions of Empire : Labor, Slavery, and the Origins of the British Atlantic Empire" (2015), Yale University Press
  22. Truxes, Thomas M, "Defying Empire : Trading with the Enemy in Colonial New York" (2008), Yale University Press
  23. Wrightson, Keith, "Earthly Necessities : Economic Lives in Early Modern Britain" (2000), Yale University Press
  24. Bardburn, Douglas, "The Visible Fist: The Chesapeake Tobacco Trade in War and the Purpose of Empire, 1690-1715", William and Mary Quarterly, 68(3), pp.361~386 (2011)
  25. Barth, Jonathan, "Reconstructing Mercantilism: Consensus and Conflict in British Imperial Economy in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries", William and Mary Quarterly, 73(2), pp.257~290 (2016)
  26. Coleman, D. C., "Revisions in Mercantilism", pp.92~117 (1969), Methuen
  27. Coleman, D. C., "Mercantilism Revisited", Historical Journal, 23(4), pp.773~791 (1980)
  28. Hoppit, Julian, "The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain Volume I: 1700-1870", pp.344~367 (2014), Cambridge University Press
  29. Kim, Daeryoon, "Regulating the British Economy, 1600-1850", pp.123~137 (2011), Ashgate
  30. Koot, Christian J., "A ‘Dangerous Principle’: Free Trade Discourses in Barbados and the English Leeward Islands, 1659-1689", Early American Studies, 5(1), pp.132~163 (2007)
  31. American Colonial Incomes, 1650-1774, "Lindert, Peter H.", NBER, 1~46, pp.NBER Working Paper 19861 (2014)
  32. McCusker, John, "The Cambridge Economic History of the United States, Volume I, The Colonial Era", pp.337~362 (1996), Cambridge University Press
  33. Menard, Russell, "Plantation Empire: How Sugar and Tobacco Planters Built Their Industries and Raised an Empire", Agricultural History, 81(3), pp.309~332 (2007)
  34. Newell, Margaret Ellen, "Putting the “Political” Back in Political Economy (This Is Not Your Parents’ Mercantilism)", William and Mary Quarterly, 69(1), pp.57~62 (2012)
  35. O'Brien, Patrick, "Political Components of the Industrial Revolution: Parliament and the English Cotton Textile Industry, 1660-1774", Economic History Review, New Series, 44(3), pp.395~423 (1991)
  36. Pettigrew, William A., "Free to Enslave: Politics and the Escalation of Britain's Transatlantic Slave Trade, 1688-1714", William and Mary Quarterly, 64(1), pp.3~38 (2007)
  37. Pincus, Steve, "Addison’s Empire: Whig Conceptions of Empire in the Early 18th Century", Parliamentary History, 31(1), pp.99~117 (2012)
  38. Pincus, Steve, "Rethinking Mercantilism: Political Economy, the British Empire, and the Atlantic World in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries", William and Mary Quarterly, 69(1), pp.3~34 (2012)
  39. Sowerby, Scott, "Pantomime History", Parliamentary History, 30, pp.236~258 (2011)
  40. Stern, Philip J., "Mercantilism Reimagined: Political Economy in Early Modern Britain and Its Empire", pp.3~22 (2014), Oxford University Press
  41. Swingen, Abigail, "Mercantilism Reimagined", pp.46~73
  42. "Declaration and Resolves of the First Continental Congress"[URL]
  43. "Papers of Benjamin Franklin"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)