환경규제와 재무성과
Environmental Regulation and Financial Performance
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
대부분의 국가에서 경제성장을 도모하는 과정에서 환경오염문제와 같은 부작용이 수반되게 되었고, 이러한 문제를 해결하기 위해 경제활동의 주체인 기업으로 하여금 사회적 책임을 수행하도록 요구하고 있다. 환경성과가 우수한 기업들은 ISO 14001 지정을 받거나, 환경마크 획득, 환경친화기업으로 선정되는 등 대외적 신뢰도의 향상 및 이미지 제고를 통해 기업의 경영성과를 증대시킬 수 있는 반면, 환경문제나 환경오염으로 인해 언론공개, 정부규제 및 환경소송에 처해 있는 기업들은 재무성과에 부정적인 영향을 미칠 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 부정적인 효과에 초점을 맞추고 환경규제위반과 재무성과와의 관련성을 검증하였다. 분석 결과, 환경규제에 대한 위반으로 인해 위반기업들의 매출액증가율(GS)과 영업현금흐름(CFO)에서 통계적으로 유의한 수준에서 음(-)의 영향을 미치는 결과로 나타났다. 이는 환경규제위반으로 인해 기업들의 대외적인 신뢰도와 이미지에 부정적인 영향을 미침으로써 매출이 감소하고, 결과적으로 영업활동으로 인한 현금흐름이 좋지 않게 나타난다는 것을 시사해준다.
Abstract
Our country have achieved high economic growth over a short period of time, but this growth accompanied with many side effects, such as environmental problems. As the companies were required social responsibility for the environmental protection, the environmental regulation was strengthened for the companies. The firms performed the environmental management activities for responding to these environmental regulation and the strengthening of the competitiveness. The companies of excellent environmental performance can improve their external image and the reliability by the appointment of ISO 14001, the acquirement of Eco-Mark and the validation of environment-friendly company, and it will have a positive impact on the financial performance. However, the environmental problems or pollutions will have a negative impact on the financial performance by the media coverage, government regulations and environmental litigation. In this study, I divided the positive effects and the negative effects of environmental performance and analyzed the relationship between the violation of environmental regulations and the corporate financial performance with a focus on the negative effects. The samples of this study are used the manufacturing companies listed on the Korean Stock Exchange among the companies which violated the environmental regulations that is enforced by the Ministry of Environment as a means of monitoring on environmental policy from 2004 to 2006. The controlling samples are selected a similar enterprise by size, and these companies are analyzed to have any effects on the financial performance. The profitability indicators for the financial performance are used Return on Sales(ROS) and Return on Equity(ROE), Growth of Sales(GS) about the growth indicator and total Cash Flow(CF) and Cash Flow from Operations(CFO) about the indicators of cash flow. According to the analysis, The companies that violates the environmental regulations have statistically significant negative effects on Growth of Sales(GS) and Cash Flow from Operations (CFO). Because the violation of environmental regulation decreased a sales by a negative effects on the image, reputation and reliability of the companies. As a result, Cash Flow from Operations (CFO) also show that is not good.
참고문헌 (35)
- 곽수근, "한국기업의 사회적 성과평가", 서울대학교 경영논집, pp.62~93 (1993)
- 박헌준, "기부와 환경보호 : 기업의 사회공헌활동과 재무적 성과간의 관계에 관한 실증적 연구", 인사조직연구, 10(1), pp.95~133 (2002), 한국인사조직학회
- 성봉석, "환경문제에 대한 기업의 대응활동이 환경대응능력 및 성과에 미치는 영향", 경영학연구, 31(4), pp.1113~1133 (2002), 한국경영학회
- 심한택, "환경오염 유발사건이 기업가치에 미치는 영향", 산업경제연구, 17(1), pp.311~328 (2004), 한국산업경제학회
- 이종은, "경제정의지수를 이용한 기업의 윤리적 행동과 재무성과간의 실증연구", 석사, 재무관리, pp.2003
- 장지인, "기업의 환경성과와 재무성과의 관련성에 관한 연구", 대한경영학회 발표논문집 (2000)
- 정길채, "환경회계정보의 공시 수준, 환경성과 그리고 재무성과의 상호관계", 박사, 회계학, pp.2000
- Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., "The Relations among Environmental Disclosure, Environmental Performance, and Economic Performance: A Simultaneous Equations Approach", Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, pp.447~471 (2004)
- Aupperle, K. E., "An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Social Responsibility and Profitability", Academy of Management journal, 28(2), pp.446~463 (1985)
- Bartel, A., "Direct and Indirect Effects of Regulation: A New Look at OSHA’s Impact", Journal of Law and Economics, 28, pp.1~25 (1985)
- Bragdon, J. H., "Is Pollution Profitable?", Risk Management, 19, pp.9~18 (1972)
- Cairncross, F., "Costing The Earth" (1992), Harvard Business School Press
- Chen, K. H., "The Relationship between Pollution Control Record and Financial Indicators Revisited", The Accounting Review, 55, pp.168~177 (1980)
- Christmann, P., "Effects of "Best Practices" of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets", Academy of Management Journal, 43, pp.663~680 (2000)
- Cohen, M. A., "Environmental and Financial Performance: Are They Related?" (1997), Investor Responsibility Research Center, Inc
- Donaldson, T., "The Stakeholder Theory of The Corporation : Concepts, Evidence, and Implications", Academy of Management Review, 20, pp.65~91 (1995)
- Dowell, G., "Do Corporate Global Environmental Standards Create or Destroy Market Value?", Management Science, 46, pp.1059-1~1059-74 (2000)
- Erfle, S., "Alternative Perspectives on Finance", pp.181~218 (1992), Bucknell University
- Freedman, M., "Pollution Disclosure, Pollution Performance and Economic Performance", The International Journal of Management Science, 10, pp.167~176 (1982)
- Freedman, M., "Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 1", pp.193~212 (1986), Elsevier
- Griffin, J. J., "The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research", Business and Society, 36, pp.5~31 (1997)
- Hart, S. L., "Does It Pay to Be Green? An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Emission Reduction and Firm Performance", Business Strategy and the Environment, 5, pp.30~37 (1996)
- Effects of Harmful Environmental Events on Reputations of Firms, "Jones, K.", Emory University, ~ (1999)
- Environmental Violations, Legal Penalties, and Reputation Costs, The Chicago Working Paper in Law and Economics, "Karpoff, J. M.", ~ (1999)
- Klassen, R. D., "The Impact of Environmental Management on Firm Performance", Management Science, 42, pp.1199~1214 (1996)
- Konar, S., "Does the Market Value Environmental Performance?", Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, pp.281~289 (2001)
- Mahapatra, S., "Investor Reaction to a Corporate Social Accounting", Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 11, pp.29~40 (1984)
- Porter, M. E., "Green and Competitive: Ending and Stalemate", Harvard Business Review, 73, pp.120~134 (1995)
- Porter, M. E., "Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, pp.97~118 (1995)
- Rockness, J., "Hazardous Waste Disposal, Corporate Disclosure, and Financial Performance in the Chemical Industry", Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 1, pp.167~191 (1986)
- Russo, M. V., "A Resource-based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability", Academy of Management Journal, 40, pp.534~559 (1997)
- Spicer, B. H., "Investors, Corporate Social Performance and Information Disclosure : An Empirical Study", Accounting Review, 53, pp.94~110 (1978)
- Ullmann, A., "Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationship Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance", Academy of Management Review, 10, pp.540~577 (1985)
- Waddock, S. A., "A Look at the Financial-Social Performance Nexus When Quality of Management Is Held Constant", International Journal of Value—Based Management, 12, pp.87~99 (1999)
- Wally, N., "It’s Not Easy Being Green", Harvard Business Review, 72, pp.46~52 (1994)
