산업재해 사망 피해의 형사 규제 방향
Proposal of Criminal Sanction Against Workers’ Death for Industrial Disaster
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
On September 27st in last year serious accident occurred causing five workers'death in Gu-mi. It was because of violation of business owner's responsibility for safety measure. Current Occupational Safety and Health Act regulates that any person who is responsible for the death of any worker due to a violation of Article 23(1) through (3) or 24 (1) shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than seven years, or by a fine not exceeding 100 million won(Article 66-2). The purpose of the Act are to maintain and promote the safety and health of workers by preventing industrial accidents by establishing standards on industrial and clarifying where the responsibilities lies, and by creating a comfortable working environment. But actually the act is invalid. Countermeasure must be considered. First, the provision that recognizes the ability for crime must be introduced in the Criminal Code. Second, the introduction of legislation the punishment against corporate crime must be in need of clarification. Corporate manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act must be introduced. Third, the legislature should strengthen criminal penalty.
Abstract
On September 27st in last year serious accident occurred causing five workers'death in Gu-mi. It was because of violation of business owner's responsibility for safety measure. Current Occupational Safety and Health Act regulates that any person who is responsible for the death of any worker due to a violation of Article 23(1) through (3) or 24 (1) shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than seven years, or by a fine not exceeding 100 million won(Article 66-2). The purpose of the Act are to maintain and promote the safety and health of workers by preventing industrial accidents by establishing standards on industrial and clarifying where the responsibilities lies, and by creating a comfortable working environment. But actually the act is invalid. Countermeasure must be considered. First, the provision that recognizes the ability for crime must be introduced in the Criminal Code. Second, the introduction of legislation the punishment against corporate crime must be in need of clarification. Corporate manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act must be introduced. Third, the legislature should strengthen criminal penalty.
참고문헌 (21)
- 강선희, "사망사고에 대한 산업안전보건법의 형사책임", 노동법학, 42 (2012), 한국노동법학회
- 한국의 신종 기업범죄의 유형과 대책, "김광준", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2002)
- 기업범죄 어떻게 예방할 것인가, "김영현", 삼성경제연구소, ~ (2005)
- 김호기, "커먼로 국가의 기업살인죄의 검토 - 기업 고유의 형사책임 인정을 위한 기업문화론적 접근방법 -", 형사법연구, 22(1), pp.305~328 (2010), 한국형사법학회
- 기업범죄의 현황 및 정책분석, "박강우", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1999)
- 신동운, "법인의 형사책임과 양벌규정" (1998), 고시연구
- 기업범죄 수사의 효율성 제고방안-선진 각국의 기업범죄 수사체계를 중심으로-, "유병규", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2003)
- 법인의 형사책임에 관한 비교법적 연구, "이기헌", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1996)
- 이재방, "법인의 범죄능력 인정과 법인처벌 방안", 홍익법학, 11(1), pp.281~304 (2010), 법학연구소
- 기업의 경제활동에 관한 형사법제 연구(Ⅱ)-기업범죄에 대한 새로운 제재도입방안 연구-, "이정민", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2010)
- 이천현, "법인의 범죄주체능력과 형사책임", 형사법연구, (22) (2004), 한국형사법학회
- 임석원, "법인의 범죄능력인정을 위한 새로운 해석의 필요성", 형사정책연구, 18(3), pp.79~106 (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
- 임석원, "양벌규정과 관련한 보호법익의 해석상 몇 가지 쟁점 - 형법과의 조화를 위한 시론 -", 법조, 60(2), pp.185~217 (2011), 법조협회
- 전형배, "산업안전보건법 벌칙규정의 현황과 과제", 강원법학, 34, pp.1~31 (2011), 비교법학연구소
- 전형배, "산업안전보건법상 사업주의 형사책임 ― 제66조의2에 관한 대법원 판례의 해석론 ―", 노동법논총, 25, pp.79~111 (2012), 한국비교노동법학회[DOI]
- 조국, "법인의 형사책임과 양벌규정의 법적 성격", 서울대학교 법학, 48(3), pp.60~76 (2007), 법학연구소
- 한성훈, "기업활동에 대한 고유의 처벌근거", 법학연구, 19(3), pp.255~287 (2011), 법학연구소
- Colvin, Eric, "Corporate Personality and Criminal Liability", Criminal Law Forum, 6(1) (1995)
- Hagan, Frank E., "Crime Types and Criminals" (2009), SAGE Publications
- Hefendahl, Ronald, "Corporate Criminal Liability: Model Penal Code Section 2.07 and the Development in Western Legal Systems", Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 4(1) (2000), University of California Press
- Simpson, Sally S., "Corporate Crime, Law and Social Control" (2002), Cambridge University Press