본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

산업안전보건법의 양벌규정 개정에 관한 연구 -기업경영진의 형사책임을 중심으로 -

The Criminal Liability of the Directors on the Industrial Safety and Health

0

조회

0

다운로드

19

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

'Korea Industrial Safety and Health Act' can be understood generally as a legislation to require employers to conduct diverse duties concerning industrial safety and health properly. Enforcement of law is guaranteed by the offence and penalty articles, among which the joint penal provision to regulate the corporate and directors criminal liability is received much concern. There are little controversies about imposing penalties on the corporate, but there is a lot of disputes on the directors criminal liability. The attitude of the courts' precedents doesn't provide corporate directors with generally accepted standard of criminal liability. This paper is searching for the relevant requirements to impose criminal liability on corporate directors who misconduct in the industrial safety and health management. Two ways may be considered in constructing directors liability. One is to organize directors liability as a kind of conspiracy liability with the offenders as shown in the British legislation example of 'Health and Safety at Work Act 1974', the other is to compose directors liability as management failure of industrial health and safety on the corporate. The former often interrupts punishment of directors, because it is based on the limited and restricted theory of conspiracy. This study prefers the latter which clarifies the contents of directors liability and initiate legal enforcement effectively. This study suggests an amendment to Korea Industrial Safety and Health Act article 71, standing on the viewpoint above. Amendment establishes article71(2) newly which contains directors liability to the corporate. Director is guilty of offences unless the offence took place without the director's knowledge or whether the director was not reasonable able to have acquired that knowledge, or the director used all due diligence to prevent the corporate committing the offences.

Abstract

'Korea Industrial Safety and Health Act' can be understood generally as a legislation to require employers to conduct diverse duties concerning industrial safety and health properly. Enforcement of law is guaranteed by the offence and penalty articles, among which the joint penal provision to regulate the corporate and directors criminal liability is received much concern. There are little controversies about imposing penalties on the corporate, but there is a lot of disputes on the directors criminal liability. The attitude of the courts' precedents doesn't provide corporate directors with generally accepted standard of criminal liability. This paper is searching for the relevant requirements to impose criminal liability on corporate directors who misconduct in the industrial safety and health management. Two ways may be considered in constructing directors liability. One is to organize directors liability as a kind of conspiracy liability with the offenders as shown in the British legislation example of 'Health and Safety at Work Act 1974', the other is to compose directors liability as management failure of industrial health and safety on the corporate. The former often interrupts punishment of directors, because it is based on the limited and restricted theory of conspiracy. This study prefers the latter which clarifies the contents of directors liability and initiate legal enforcement effectively. This study suggests an amendment to Korea Industrial Safety and Health Act article 71, standing on the viewpoint above. Amendment establishes article71(2) newly which contains directors liability to the corporate. Director is guilty of offences unless the offence took place without the director's knowledge or whether the director was not reasonable able to have acquired that knowledge, or the director used all due diligence to prevent the corporate committing the offences.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 김일수, "형법총론" (2006), 박영사
  2. 배종대, "형법총론" (2002), 홍문사
  3. 신동운, "형법총론" (2008), 법문사
  4. 손동권, "이중기능적 양벌규정 -산업안전보건법의 적용사례를 중심으로-", 민주사회를 위한 변론, (5) (1995)
  5. 이은정, "양벌규정의 유형별 문제점과 개선방안", 법제현안, (152) (2003), 국회사무처 법제실
  6. 이재상, "형법총론" (2007), 박영사
  7. 정성근, "형법총론" (1996), 법지사
  8. 정성근, "형법총론" (2001), 삼지원
  9. 진계호, "형법총론" (2000), 대왕사
  10. 조흠학, "산업안전보건법처벌의 사업주 책임에 관한 연구", 사회법연구, (5) (2006), 한국사회법학회
  11. 노동부, "2006년도 산업재해분석", ~ (2007)
  12. David Burgman, "International comparison for health and safety responsibilities of company directors" (2007), HSE
  13. "HSE Enforcement Guide, Proceeding against 'director, manager, secretary or other similar officer' (HSWA s. 37) Appendix 2" (2008), HSE
  14. Health and Safety Commission, "Enforcement policy statement" (2002), HSE
  15. Legislating the Criminal Code: INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER, Law Commission Report(No 237), , The Law Commission, ~ (1996)
  16. The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill (Research Paper 06, "466 October 2006)", Miriam Peck, 2006
  17. "Prosecuting Individuals, Operational Circular (130", 8), HSE, 2003
  18. "Reforming the law on involuntary manslaughter: the government's proposals, Home Office", ~ (2000)
  19. "경향신문 홈페이지"[URL]
  20. "영국산업안전보건위원회 홈페이지"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)