양형절차에서 피해자 진술권의 역할 -형사소송법 제294조의 2를 중심으로-
A Study on the Role of Victim Impact Statement in Sentencing Process -Focusing on Article 294-2 of the Criminal Procedure Law-
0
조회
0
다운로드
18
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Victim Impact Statement(VIS) is a basic right guaranteed by the Constitution (Article 27 Section 5) which aims to provide such victim an opportunity to reflect his or her interest or opinion into the criminal process. As an implementing statute of such right, the Criminal Procedure Law (Section 294-2) sets forth the victims'right to make a statement and such right may be exercised in the course of witness examination process. However, some problems arise: the VIS constitutionally protected is exercised in the way of witness examination; there is a room of infringing on such victim's right because the right to make a statement may be restricted if the victim sufficiently make his or her statement during the witness examination; and, it may be necessary to limit the scope of statement because the victim's statement may negatively influence on the sentencing. In this paper, in order to comply with the purpose of the system of VIS, I make a point and suggest some ways to alleviate those problems mentioned above that:the victim's right to make a statement is a basic right and, thus, its scope should not restricted; and the victim's statement may be made in the closing argument in order to prevent it from influencing on sentencing. Moreover, I think that, in order to handle with the cases where a victim is not satisfied with a sentence, it is necessary to take into account of adopting a system where a victim can participate in the sentencing process more aggressively.
Abstract
Victim Impact Statement(VIS) is a basic right guaranteed by the Constitution (Article 27 Section 5) which aims to provide such victim an opportunity to reflect his or her interest or opinion into the criminal process. As an implementing statute of such right, the Criminal Procedure Law (Section 294-2) sets forth the victims'right to make a statement and such right may be exercised in the course of witness examination process. However, some problems arise: the VIS constitutionally protected is exercised in the way of witness examination; there is a room of infringing on such victim's right because the right to make a statement may be restricted if the victim sufficiently make his or her statement during the witness examination; and, it may be necessary to limit the scope of statement because the victim's statement may negatively influence on the sentencing. In this paper, in order to comply with the purpose of the system of VIS, I make a point and suggest some ways to alleviate those problems mentioned above that:the victim's right to make a statement is a basic right and, thus, its scope should not restricted; and the victim's statement may be made in the closing argument in order to prevent it from influencing on sentencing. Moreover, I think that, in order to handle with the cases where a victim is not satisfied with a sentence, it is necessary to take into account of adopting a system where a victim can participate in the sentencing process more aggressively.
참고문헌 (29)
- 강경래, "일본의 범죄피해자지원 및 보호", 피해자학연구, 14(1), pp.325~353 (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 김성돈, "범죄피해자보호·지원을 위한 회복적 패러다임의 실천방안", 피해자학연구, 16(1), pp.5~35 (2008), 한국피해자학회
- 김성환, "범죄피해자지원의 헌법적 근거", 헌법학연구, 12(5), pp.463~492 (2006), 한국헌법학회
- 김재희, "양형에서 범죄피해자에 대한 연구", 박사, 형사법, pp.2010
- 피해자의견진술제도에 관한 연구, "김지선", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2008)
- 류병관, "범죄피해자 진술권의 성격 및 내용에 관한 연구", 형사정책, 20(2), pp.201~223 (2008), 한국형사정책학회
- 민영성, "피해자의 양형절차에의 참가와 의견진술", 저스티스, (93), pp.164~179 (2006), 한국법학원
- 박광민, "범죄피해자의 양형절차에의 참가", 형사법연구, 21(4), pp.175~194 (2009), 한국형사법학회
- 박상식, "범죄피해자의 의견진술권에 관한 연구", 피해자학연구, 14(1), pp.75~115 (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 법무부, "성폭력피해 아동·장애인 진술조력인제도 입법공청회", 공청회자료집 (2012), 법무부
- 안성수, "범죄피해자 보호의 제도적 강화방안", 형사법의 신동향, 통권 : 16 (2008)
- 이재상, "형사절차상의 피해자보호방안", 형사정책연구, 11, pp.108~ (1992)
- 이승호, "공판절차에서 피해자의 지위에 관한 비교법적 고찰", 피해자학연구, 20(1), pp.83~104 (2012), 한국피해자학회[DOI]
- 조국, "강간피해 고소여성의 성관계 이력의 증거사용 제한 ― 미국 “강간방지법”을 중심으로", 저스티스, 69통권 : 69, pp.178~191 (2002), 한국법학원
- 천진호, "범죄피해자의 권리 확보방안", 피해자학연구, 15(1), pp.5~36 (2007), 한국피해자학회
- 헌법재판소, "1989. 4. 17, 88헌마3", ~ (1989)
- 헌법재판소, "2002. 10. 31, 2002헌마 453", ~ (2002)
- Alice Koskela, "Victim's Rights Amendments: An Irresistible Political Force Transforms the Criminal Justice System" (1997), Idaho Law Review
- Garner, Bryan, A., "Black's Law Dictionary" (1999), West group
- McLeod, M., "Victim participation at Sentencing", Criminal Law Bulletin, 22 (1986)
- Edna Erez, "Victim Voice Statements and Sentencing : Intergrating Restorative Justice and Therapeutic Jurisprudence Principles in Adversarial Proceedings", Crim. Law Bulletin, 40(5), pp.3~ (2004)
- Edna Erez, "量手続への被害 者の參加,量刑の結果そして 被害者福祉, In 犯罪被害者と刑事司法" (1998), 成文堂
- Susan Bandes, "Empathy, Narrative and Victim Impact Statements", University of Chicago Law Review, 63(361), pp.410~ (1996)
- 橫田信之, "被害者と量刑(1,2,3,4)", 判例タイムズ, (1275) (2009)
- 酒卷匡, "犯罪被害者による意見の陳述について", 法曹, 52(11) (2000)
- 中野目 善則, "被害者の刑事手續への參加", 現代刑事法, (10) (2000)
- 城下裕二, "量刑理論の現代的課題" (2007), 成文堂
- 佐伯昌彦, "犯罪被害者の刑事裁判への參加と節次的公正の社會心理學", 法と心理, 11 (2011)